Literature DB >> 23404417

Healthcare technology: physician collaboration in reducing the surgical cost.

Steven A Olson1, William T Obremskey, Kevin J Bozic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increasing cost of providing health care is a national concern. Healthcare spending related to providing hospital care is one of the primary drivers of healthcare spending in the United States. Adoption of advanced medical technologies accounts for the largest percentage of growth in healthcare spending in the United States when compared with other developed countries. Within the specialty of orthopaedic surgery, a variety of implants can result in similar outcomes for patients in several areas of clinical care. However, surgeons often do not know the cost of implants used in a specific procedure or how the use of an implant or technology affects the overall cost of the episode of care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to describe physician-led processes for introduction of new surgical products and technologies; and (2) to inform physicians of potential cost savings of physician-led product contract negotiations and approval of new technology.
METHODS: We performed a detailed review of the steps taken by two centers that have implemented surgeon-led programs to demonstrate responsibility in technology acquisition and product procurement decision-making.
RESULTS: Each program has developed a physician peer review process in technology and new product acquisition that has resulted in a substantial reduction in spending for the respective hospitals in regard to surgical implants. Implant costs have decreased between 3% and 38% using different negotiating strategies. At the same time, new product requests by physicians have been approved in greater than 90% of instances.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals need physicians to be engaged and informed in discussions concerning current and new technology and products. Surgeons can provide leadership for these efforts to reduce the cost of high-quality care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23404417      PMCID: PMC3706644          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2828-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Ten lessons for evidence-based technology assessment.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Developing an assessment process for new technologies.

Authors:  Allan Fine
Journal:  Healthc Financ Manage       Date:  2003-05

Review 3.  Understanding the underlying drivers of inpatient cost growth: a literature review.

Authors:  Mireille M Goetghebeur; Sharon Forrest; Joel W Hay
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Cost analysis of primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  K O'Shea; E Bale; P Murray
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2002-06

5.  Hospital competition, cost, and medical practice.

Authors:  H S Luft; D W Garnick; R G Hughes; S S Hunt; S J McPhee; J C Robinson
Journal:  J Med Pract Manage       Date:  1988

6.  Technology assessment and equipment planning in Kaiser Permanente, Northern California Region.

Authors:  G J Gordon; K M Tan
Journal:  J Clin Eng       Date:  1992 May-Jun

7.  Hospital-based employment of orthopaedic surgeons--passing trend or new paradigm?: AOA critical issues.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Martin Roche; Sam G Agnew
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Immunization against poliomyelitis: risk/benefit/cost in a changing context.

Authors:  J Salk
Journal:  Dev Biol Stand       Date:  1979

9.  The effectiveness of a hospital-based strategy to reduce the cost of total joint implants.

Authors:  J D Zuckerman; F J Kummer; V H Frankel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R W Chang; J M Pellisier; G B Hazen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

1.  Opportunity cost in the economic evaluation of da Vinci robotic assisted surgery.

Authors:  Fernando Fuertes-Guiró; Montserrat Girabent-Farrés; Eduardo Viteri-Velasco
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-03-06

2.  Survey finds few orthopedic surgeons know the costs of the devices they implant.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Robert V O'Toole; Andrew N Pollak; Julius A Bishop; Christopher M McAndrew; Samir Mehta; William W Cross; Grant E Garrigues; Mitchel B Harris; Christopher T Lebrun
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Cost-effectiveness of per oral endoscopic myotomy relative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  Erin K Greenleaf; Joshua S Winder; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Randy S Haluck; Abraham Mathew; Eric M Pauli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Total caseload of a colorectal surgical unit: baseline measurement and identification of areas for efficiency gains.

Authors:  Tarik Sammour; Andrew Macleod; Tim J Chittleborough; Raaj Chandra; Susan M Shedda; Ian A Hastie; Ian T Jones; Ian P Hayes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  EVALUATION OF THE KNOWLEDGE ON COST OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS AMONG ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS.

Authors:  Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani; Rodrigo Guerra Sabongi; Alysson Ferreira Batista; Diego Costa Astur; Guilherme Guadagnini Falotico; Moises Cohen
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

6.  Peer-to-Peer Collaboration Adds Value for Surgical Colleagues.

Authors:  Ameer M Elbuluk; Michael P Ast; Jeffrey D Stimac; Trevor R Banka; Matthew P Abdel; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-05-21

7.  Physician preference items: what factors matter to surgeons? Does the vendor matter?

Authors:  Lawton R Burns; Michael G Housman; Robert E Booth; Aaron M Koenig
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-01-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.