| Literature DB >> 23403929 |
Ding-Feng Peng1, Shao-Yong Tang, Yong-Jun Hu, Jiao Chen, Li Yang.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the pathophysiological changes in a rat chronic heart failure complicated with renal failure model, caused by three-quarters nephrectomy and subcutaneous injection of isoproterenol (ISO). Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats in the model group received three-quarters nephrectomy after twice undergoing surgical resections and subcutaneous injection of ISO (100 mg/kg body weight, injected twice, with a 24 h interval) after one week, while rats in the control group received sham surgery and injection of normal saline. Survival rate, heart failure and renal failure were compared between the two groups after 4 weeks. Serum creatinine (Cr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), B-type natriuretic protein (BNP), aldolase (ALD), angiotensin II (Ang II) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined by kit assay. Urine protein at 24 h was determined by the Bradford method and left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), left ventricular diastolic pressure (LVDP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), as well as the maximum rates of increased and decreased left ventricular pressure (±dP/dt(max)) were determined by left ventricular intubation. Heart weight indices were determined and the myocardial pathological conditions were observed by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. There was no death in the control group, while the survival rate of the model group was 73%. Compared with the control group, each index of serum and urine protein in the model group was significantly increased. Additionally, LVSP was decreased, LVDP and LVEDP were increased and heart weight index was increased, with a significant difference. The serum Cr was positively correlated to BNP levels in the model group. Three-quarters nephrectomy and subcutaneous injection of ISO induces left ventricular heart failure and renal failure at the same time, which is characterized in pathophysiology by left ventricular diastolic and systolic function failure, left ventricular myocardial hypertrophy and reconstruction complicated with renal insufficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Sprague-Dawley rats; heart failure; isoprenaline; renal failure
Year: 2012 PMID: 23403929 PMCID: PMC3570093 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2012.865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of urine protein, urea and creatinine between the control and model groups.
| Group | Serum creatinine ( | Urea nitrogen (mmol/l) | Urine protein (mg/24 h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 40.6±10.8 | 5.89±2.26 | 15.6±5.36 |
| Model | 77.5±8.7 | 10.2±1.5 | 70.5±12.7 |
P<0.01 vs. the control group. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Comparison of left ventricular cardiac function and blood dynamic parameters between the control and model groups.
| Group | LVSP (mmHg) | LVDP (mmHg) | LVEDP (mmHg) | +dP/dtmax (mmHg/sec) | −dP/dtmax (mmHg/sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 136.7±8.2 | 0.8±1.1 | 2.0±1.8 | 8060±892 | −6902±949 |
| Model | 110.9±8.7 | 1.8±0.6 | 4.6±1.0 | 5536±439 | −4036±413 |
P<0.05 and
P<0.01 vs. the control group. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure; LVDP, left ventricular diastolic pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; ±dP/dtmax, maximum rates of increased and decreased left ventricular pressure.
Figure 1.Comparison of BNP, ALD and Ang II between the control and model groups. *P<0.01, compared with the control group. (A) Serum BNP (pg/ml); (B) ALD (μg/ml); (C) Ang II (μg/ml) and (D) CRP (μg/ml). BNP, B-type natriuretic protein; ALD, aldolase; Ang II, angiotensin II; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Figure 2.Correlogram of serum BNP and Cr. Serum BNP was positively correlated with serum Cr, with a correlation coefficient r=0.81, P<0.01. BNP, B-type natriuretic protein; Cr, creatinine.
Comparison of weight, left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass index between the control and model groups.
| Group | LVW (g) | BW (kg) | LVW/BW (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.40±0.04 | 0.29±0.01 | 1.38±0.14 |
| Model | 0.57±0.04 | 0.25±0.01 | 2.29±0.19 |
P<0.01 vs. the control group. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. LVW, left ventricular weight; BW, body weight.
Figure 3.Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of cardiac muscular tissue in the left ventricle. (A) Control group and (B) model group (magnification, ×100).