OBJECTIVES: To examine whether high performance on one measure of quality is associated with high performance on others and to develop a data-driven explanatory model of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) performance. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional data analysis of a statewide perinatal care database. Risk-adjusted NICU ranks were computed for each of 8 measures of quality selected based on expert input. Correlations across measures were tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine whether underlying factors were driving the correlations. SETTING: Twenty-two regional NICUs in California. PATIENTS: In total, 5445 very low-birth-weight infants cared for between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2007. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Pneumothorax, growth velocity, health care-associated infection, antenatal corticosteroid use, hypothermia during the first hour of life, chronic lung disease, mortality in the NICU, and discharge on any human breast milk. RESULTS: The NICUs varied substantially in their clinical performance across measures of quality. Of 28 unit-level correlations, 6 were significant (ρ < .05). Correlations between pairs of measures of quality of care were strong (ρ ≥ .5) for 1 pair, moderate (range, ρ ≥ .3 to ρ < .5) for 8 pairs, weak (range, ρ ≥ .1 to ρ < .3) for 5 pairs, and negligible (ρ < .1) for 14 pairs. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 4 underlying factors of quality in this sample. Pneumothorax, mortality in the NICU, and antenatal corticosteroid use loaded on factor 1; growth velocity and health care-associated infection loaded on factor 2; chronic lung disease loaded on factor 3; and discharge on any human breast milk loaded on factor 4. CONCLUSION: In this sample, the ability of individual measures of quality to explain overall quality of neonatal intensive care was modest.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether high performance on one measure of quality is associated with high performance on others and to develop a data-driven explanatory model of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) performance. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional data analysis of a statewide perinatal care database. Risk-adjusted NICU ranks were computed for each of 8 measures of quality selected based on expert input. Correlations across measures were tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine whether underlying factors were driving the correlations. SETTING: Twenty-two regional NICUs in California. PATIENTS: In total, 5445 very low-birth-weight infants cared for between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2007. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Pneumothorax, growth velocity, health care-associated infection, antenatal corticosteroid use, hypothermia during the first hour of life, chronic lung disease, mortality in the NICU, and discharge on any humanbreast milk. RESULTS: The NICUs varied substantially in their clinical performance across measures of quality. Of 28 unit-level correlations, 6 were significant (ρ < .05). Correlations between pairs of measures of quality of care were strong (ρ ≥ .5) for 1 pair, moderate (range, ρ ≥ .3 to ρ < .5) for 8 pairs, weak (range, ρ ≥ .1 to ρ < .3) for 5 pairs, and negligible (ρ < .1) for 14 pairs. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 4 underlying factors of quality in this sample. Pneumothorax, mortality in the NICU, and antenatal corticosteroid use loaded on factor 1; growth velocity and health care-associated infection loaded on factor 2; chronic lung disease loaded on factor 3; and discharge on any humanbreast milk loaded on factor 4. CONCLUSION: In this sample, the ability of individual measures of quality to explain overall quality of neonatal intensive care was modest.
Authors: Laura A Petersen; LeChauncy D Woodard; Tracy Urech; Christina Daw; Supicha Sookanan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jonah J Stulberg; Conor P Delaney; Duncan V Neuhauser; David C Aron; Pingfu Fu; Siran M Koroukian Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Profit; J B Gould; J A F Zupancic; A R Stark; K M Wall; M A Kowalkowski; M Mei; K Pietz; E J Thomas; L A Petersen Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Peter J Pronovost; Christine A Goeschel; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Sam Watson; Lisa H Lubomski; Sean M Berenholtz; David A Thompson; David J Sinopoli; Sara Cosgrove; J Bryan Sexton; Jill A Marsteller; Robert C Hyzy; Robert Welsh; Patricia Posa; Kathy Schumacher; Dale Needham Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-02-04
Authors: Jochen Profit; Jeffrey B Gould; Mihoko Bennett; Benjamin A Goldstein; David Draper; Ciaran S Phibbs; Henry C Lee Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jochen Profit; Marc A Kowalkowski; John A F Zupancic; Kenneth Pietz; Peter Richardson; David Draper; Sylvia J Hysong; Eric J Thomas; Laura A Petersen; Jeffrey B Gould Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jochen Profit; Jeffrey B Gould; Mihoko Bennett; Benjamin A Goldstein; David Draper; Ciaran S Phibbs; Henry C Lee Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas; Walusa A G Ferri; Sérgio T M Marba; Davi C Aragon; Ruth Guinsburg; Maria F B de Almeida; Edna M A Diniz; Rita C S Silveira; José M S Alves Junior; Marco B Pavanelli; Maria R Bentlin; Daniela M L M Ferreira; Marynéa S Vale; Humberto H Fiori; José L M B Duarte; Jucille A Meneses; Silvia Cwajg; Werther B Carvalho; Lígia S L Ferrari; Nathalia M M Silva; Regina P G V C da Silva; Leni M Anchieta; Juliana P F Santos; Mandira D Kawakami Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Jochen Profit; Eileen T Lake; Jessica B Liu; Lee M Sanders; Ciaran S Phibbs Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Itziar Marsinyach Ros; Laura Sanchez García; Ana Sanchez Torres; Rocio Mosqueda Peña; Maria Del Carmen Pérez Grande; Maria José Rodríguez Castaño; Maria Dolores Elorza Fernández; Manuel Sánchez Luna Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 3.183