Literature DB >> 23402530

Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rates and crestal bone levels: a 36-month follow-up prospective study.

Luciano Malchiodi1, Alessandro Cucchi, Paolo Ghensi, Dario Consonni, Pier F Nocini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to determine how the crown-implant ratio (C/I ratio) influences crestal bone loss and implant success rates after a 3-year follow-up, using implants with a sintered porous surface (SPS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of preestablished inclusion and exclusion criteria, 151 of a cohort of 160 patients with single or partial edentulism were selected as eligible for the study. The 151 patients were treated consecutively from 2005 to 2007 using 280 SPS implants, which were restored with a single crown or a partial fixed denture. The data collection included both clinical and anatomical C/I ratios; other implant prosthetic factors were also recorded. Implants were divided into three groups according to the C/I ratio. Clinical and radiographic examinations were scheduled over a 36-month follow-up of functional loading according to a well-established protocol generally applied to determine implant success rates and crestal bone levels. Statistical analysis was used to determine any significant differences or correlations (P = 0.05).
RESULTS: A total of 259 SPS implants in 136 patients were followed up for 36 months. According to the success criteria, the overall implant-based success rate was 98.1%, and the mean peri-implant bone loss (PBL) was 0.48 ± 0.29 mm. Statistical analysis revealed significant correlation between implant success rate and C/I ratio (P < 0.05) and between PBL and C/I ratio (P < 0.05). The critical threshold value of the anatomical and clinical C/I ratio for avoiding excessive bone loss or implant failure was 3.10 and 3.40.
CONCLUSION: This prospective cohort study revealed that SPS implants offer a predictable solution for implant prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with edentulism characterized by different alveolar bone atrophy. From the biomechanical point of view, the C/I ratio would appear to be the main parameter capable of influencing implant success and crestal bone loss. Consequently, it is important not to exceed the threshold values in order to avoid excessive stress at the bone-implant interface capable of resulting in excessive crestal bone loss or implant failure.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone implant interactions; clinical research; clinical trials; surgical techniques

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23402530     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

1.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of hypophosphatasia with precision attachment retained unconventional partial denture: a case report.

Authors:  Gayatri Sheena Suvarna; Ramesh Khandurao Nadiger; Satyabodh Shesharaj Guttal; Omkar Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

2.  Photoelastic analysis of fixed partial prosthesis crown height and implant length on distribution of stress in two dental implant systems.

Authors:  Evandro Portela Figueirêdo; Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez; Marcele Jardim Pimentel; Ana Regina Oliveira Moreira; Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo; José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-10-08

Review 3.  The Prosthetic Influence and Biomechanics on Peri-Implant Strain: a Systematic Literature Review of Finite Element Studies.

Authors:  Julius Maminskas; Algirdas Puisys; Ritva Kuoppala; Aune Raustia; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

4.  Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Jacopo Pighi; Mauro Marincola; Giovanni Corrocher; Miguel Simancas-Pallares; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-07-02

5.  Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Elisabetta Vignudelli; Aldo Napolitano; Claudio Marchetti; Giuseppe Corinaldesi
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.932

6.  Single-Crown, Short and Ultra-Short Implants, in Association with Simultaneous Internal Sinus Lift in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Three-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Mauro Marincola; Annarita Signoriello; Giovanni Corrocher; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Helle Baungaard Nielsen; Søren Schou; Niels Henrik Bruun; Thomas Starch-Jensen
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-16

8.  The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Konstanty Sławecki; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Marzena Dominiak; Tomasz Gedrange
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Henny J A Meijer; Carina Boven; Konstantina Delli; Gerry M Raghoebar
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  CT-based dentulous mandibular alveolar ridge measurements as predictors of crown-to-implant ratio for short and extra short dental implants.

Authors:  Francesco Cavallin; Stefano Sivolella; Silvia Meggiorin; Nadia Ferrarese; Amalia Lupi; Antonino Fiorino; Chiara Giraudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.