Literature DB >> 23401950

A comparison of above-ground and below-ground populations of Culex pipiens pipiens in Chicago, Illinois, and New York City, New York, using 2 microsatellite assays.

Linda Kothera1, Marvin Godsey, John-Paul Mutebi, Harry M Savage.   

Abstract

Aboveground and belowground populations of the mosquito Culex pipiens pipiens are traditionally classified as form (f.) pipiens and f. molestus, respectively, and gene flow between forms is thought to be limited. Relatively few f. molestus populations have been found in the United States, which has hindered their study in North America. In this investigation, we used microsatellites to characterize a recently discovered population of f. molestus in Chicago, IL, and compared levels of genetic diversity and differentiation in above-ground and below-ground populations from Chicago and New York City, NY. Levels of genetic diversity were markedly lower in both f. molestus populations. Pairwise F(ST) values between populations indicated that f. molestus populations were highly divergent from each other, as well as from their associated aboveground populations. The most likely number of genetic clusters depended on the number of loci used; we began with a set of 8, and reanalyzed the specimens with 17. Using a panel of 17 loci, there were 4 clusters, 1 for each below-ground population, and 1 for each pair of above-ground populations. Our findings are supportive of the hypothesis that f. molestus populations in Chicago and New York City arose from local aboveground populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23401950      PMCID: PMC5501105          DOI: 10.2987/8756-971X-28.4.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc        ISSN: 8756-971X            Impact factor:   0.917


  22 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The inheritance of autogeny in the Culex pipiens complex of mosquitoes.

Authors:  A SPIELMAN
Journal:  Am J Hyg       Date:  1957-05

4.  Laboratory transmission of Japanese encephalitis and West Nile viruses by molestus form of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) collected in Uzbekistan in 2004.

Authors:  M J Turell; C N Mores; D J Dohm; N Komilov; J Paragas; J S Lee; D Shermuhemedova; T P Endy; A Kodirov; S Khodjaev
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Discovery of Culex pipiens pipiens form molestus in Chicago.

Authors:  John-Paul Mutebi; Harry M Savage
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.917

6.  THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nei; Takeo Maruyama; Ranajit Chakraborty
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Studies on autogeny in natural populations of Culex pipiens. II. Seasonal abundance of autogenous and anautogenous populations.

Authors:  A Spielman
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1971-12-15       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Genetic differences between Culex pipiens f. molestus and Culex pipiens pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) in New York.

Authors:  Rebekah J Kent; Laura C Harrington; Douglas E Norris
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.278

9.  Commensalism, adaptation and gene flow: mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens complex in different habitats.

Authors:  C Chevillon; R Eritja; N Pasteur; M Raymond
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Genetic influences on mosquito feeding behavior and the emergence of zoonotic pathogens.

Authors:  A Marm Kilpatrick; Laura D Kramer; Matthew J Jones; Peter P Marra; Peter Daszak; Dina M Fonseca
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.345

View more
  5 in total

1.  La Crosse Virus Field Detection and Vector Competence of Culex Mosquitoes.

Authors:  M Camille Harris; Fan Yang; Dorian M Jackson; Eric J Dotseth; Sally L Paulson; Dana M Hawley
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Evolutionary genomics of Culex pipiens: global and local adaptations associated with climate, life-history traits and anthropogenic factors.

Authors:  Hosseinali Asgharian; Peter L Chang; Sergey Lysenkov; Victoria A Scobeyeva; William K Reisen; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Population genetic and admixture analyses of Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in California, United States.

Authors:  Linda Kothera; Brittany M Nelms; William K Reisen; Harry M Savage
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Global evaluation of taxonomic relationships and admixture within the Culex pipiens complex of mosquitoes.

Authors:  Matthew L Aardema; Bridgett M vonHoldt; Megan L Fritz; Steven R Davis
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Genomic differentiation and intercontinental population structure of mosquito vectors Culex pipiens pipiens and Culex pipiens molestus.

Authors:  Andrey A Yurchenko; Reem A Masri; Natalia V Khrabrova; Anuarbek K Sibataev; Megan L Fritz; Maria V Sharakhova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.