| Literature DB >> 23401760 |
Abstract
The hepatitis B virus is second only to tobacco as a known human carcinogen. However, chronic hepatitis B usually does not produce symptoms and people feel healthy even in the early stages of live cancer. Therefore, chronically infected people should perceive it as a serious health problem and move on to appropriate health behaviour. The purpose of this paper is to develop and validate an online program for promoting self-management among Korean patients with chronic hepatitis B. The online program was developed using a prototyping approach and system developing life cycle method, evaluated by users for their satisfaction with the website and experts for the quality of the site. To evaluate the application of the online program, knowledge and self-management compliance of the subjects were measured and compared before and after the application of the online program. There were statistically significant increases in knowledge and self-management compliance in the user group. An online program with high accessibility and applicability including information, motivation, and behavior skill factors can promote self-management of the patient with chronic hepatitis B. Findings from this study allow Korean patients with chronic hepatitis B to engage in proactive and effective health management in the community or clinical practice.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23401760 PMCID: PMC3557620 DOI: 10.1155/2013/702079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurs Res Pract ISSN: 2090-1429
Figure 1Stages for the development of an online program for promoting self-management.
Main issues of program for promoting self-management of patients with hepatitis B.
| Priority | Main issues | Topics |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | “Hepatitis B, is this genetic disease?” | (i) Definition of hepatitis B |
| (ii) Infection route of hepatitis B | ||
| (i) Natural course of hepatitis B | ||
| 2 | “I am healthy!” | (ii) Sign and symptom of hepatitis B |
| (iii) Importance of disease monitoring | ||
| 3 | “I don't exactly know what GPT is” | Understanding of the results of the test |
| 4 | “When do I have to take this medicine?” | (i) Indication of treatment |
| (ii) Importance of compliance with medication | ||
| 5 | “Level of liver function test went up again in spite of medication for a long time.” | (i) Drug tolerance and side effect |
| (ii) Management of drug tolerance and side effect | ||
| 6 | “Do I have to quit drinking or smoking?” | Management of daily life |
| 7 | “Am I a hepatitis B carrier? I got a vaccination against hepatitis B a long time ago” | Vaccine candidates |
| 8 | “How do I have to manage not to infect my baby?” | (i) Prevention of vertical infection with hepatitis B |
| “Could I perform breast feeding for my baby?” | (ii) Breast feeding | |
| 9 | “I don't want others notice that I have hepatitis B,” | Psychosocial coping |
| 10 | “I'm worrying about getting liver cancer eventually.” | Stress management |
Figure 2Initial screen and main page.
Figure 3Structure of the online program.
User satisfaction with online program for hepatitis B patients (n = 28).
| Criteria | Category | Mean | Mean score of |
|---|---|---|---|
| System efficiency | Easy to connect | 3.73 | 3.68 |
| Fast to search information | 3.64 | ||
|
| |||
| Easy to contact to operator | 3.58 | ||
| System convenience | Easy to use the system | 3.92 | 3.75 |
| Friendly to use | 3.75 | ||
|
| |||
| Design | Attractive design | 3.82 | 3.82 |
|
| |||
| Well-arranged information | 3.82 | ||
| Up-to-date information | 3.79 | ||
| Clear information | 3.75 | ||
| Content relevancy | Necessary information | 3.85 | 3.85 |
| Reliable information | 3.88 | ||
| Accurate content | 4.02 | ||
| Rich content | 4.05 | ||
| Detailed content | 3.64 | ||
|
| |||
| Content related to me | 4.14 | ||
| Content usefulness | Useful for my health behavior | 3.92 | 4.01 |
| Easy to understand | 3.96 | ||
Online program evaluation by expert panel (n = 20).
| Criteria | Item | Mean score | Mean score of each criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose described | 4.58 | ||
| Purpose | Intended audience described | 4.52 | 4.35 |
| Sufficient information provided | 4.34 | ||
| Consistent content organization | 3.98 | ||
|
| |||
| Appropriate site title | 4.15 | ||
| Relevant content for the purpose | 4.25 | ||
| Relevant content to intended audience | 4.20 | ||
| Appropriateness | Relevant content for a subject | 4.37 | 4.22 |
| Appropriate information presentation | 4.28 | ||
| Relevant linkage | 4.33 | ||
| Understandable content to intended audience | 3.94 | ||
|
| |||
| Accurate information | 3.96 | ||
| Accuracy | Source of the information | 4.28 | 3.92 |
| Responsiveness | 3.88 | ||
| Validation process described | 3.57 | ||
|
| |||
| Credibility | Organization behind the site clearly presented | 3.78 | 4.07 |
| Organization address, phone, email | 4.36 | ||
|
| |||
| Site map | 4.24 | ||
| Ease of use | Structure of the site clearly communicated | 4.11 | 4.14 |
| Search function | 4.08 | ||
|
| |||
| Interactivity | Clear user feedback mechanisms | 3.52 | 3.73 |
| Care of users' feedback | 3.95 | ||
|
| |||
| Easy to access | 4.08 | ||
| Currency | Date of first posting | 3.32 | 3.54 |
| Date of last modification | 3.21 | ||
|
| |||
| Authority | Authors of all information | 3.56 | 3.83 |
| Authors' name and affiliation | 4.10 | ||
Comparison of knowledge and self-management compliance before and after application of the online program (n = 42).
| Variables | Before | After |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Knowledge | 17.33 | 4.13 | 18.75 | 3.99 | −2.45 | .019 |
| Self-management compliance | 59.02 | 7.11 | 60.59 | 7.82 | −2.30 | .027 |