Literature DB >> 23399808

Magnetic resonance-guided freehand radiofrequency ablation of malignant liver lesions: a new simplified and time-efficient approach using an interactive open magnetic resonance scan platform and hepatocyte-specific contrast agent.

Frank Fischbach1, Katharina Lohfink, Gunnar Gaffke, Christian Wybranski, Konrad Mohnike, Uta Wonneberger, Maciej Pech, Kerstin Jungnickel, Jens Ricke, Katharina Strach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to develop magnetic resonance (MR)-guided freehand radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a near-real-time interactive MR platform in an open 1.0-T MR scanner and to determine the feasibility and safety of this new approach in the clinical setting.
METHODS: The study was performed using an open 1.0-T MR system and a low-pass filter to prevent interaction between the RFA generator and the scanner. Artifact size of the radiofrequency needle was measured in 2 perpendicular views (transversal [tra] and coronal [cor]) in vitro and in the tra orientation in vivo for diagnostic (T1 high resolution isotropic volume excitation [THRIVE]/T2 turbo spin-echo [TSE]) and near-real-time (T1 fast-field-echo [FFE]) imaging. A liver-specific contrast medium (gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) was administered 20 minutes before the intervention to enhance lesion visibility. Visibility was rated and compared for both interventional and diagnostic imaging sequences using a 10-point grading scale. Intervention time and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The mean diameter of needle artifact size for interventional T1 FFE was 17.4 ± 0.7 mm (tra) and 17.1 ± 1.1 mm (cor) in vitro and 15.2 ± 1.5 mm (tra) in vivo. Artifact size for diagnostic imaging was 12.5 ± 1.8 mm (tra) and 11.2 ± 1.4 mm (cor) in vitro and 10.5 ± 1.7 mm in vivo using THRIVE and 8.1 ± 2.4 mm (tra) and 10.8 ± 1.8 mm (cor) in vitro and 9.7 ± 2.0 mm (tra) in vivo using T2 TSE. A total of 57 patients with liver malignancies (mean tumor size, 17 ± 7 mm) underwent freehand MR-guided RFA. In all patients, the ablative procedure was technically successful. Lesion visibility of the diagnostic T2 TSE sequence (4 ± 2) was significantly decreased compared with both the diagnostic (THRIVE, 7 ± 2) and interventional (T1 FFE, 8 ± 1) T1-weighted sequences. Mean time to position the applicator was 7.5 ± 2 minutes. Procedure times ranged from 30 to 60 minutes. The mean in-room time was 57 ± 22 minutes. No major complications were recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance-guided freehand RFA using a near-real-time interactive MR platform in an open 1.0-T MR scanner is feasible, safe, and applicable in clinical routine. The administration of a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent enhances lesion visualization and therefore improves targeting. Without the need for additional sophisticated devices, this new approach simplifies and shortens the RFA procedure compared with previously published methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23399808     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182803dae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  9 in total

1.  [Percutaneous interventions in an open MR system: technical background and clinical indications].

Authors:  F Fischbach; K Fischbach; J Ricke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Real-time MR-guided brain biopsy using 1.0-T open MRI scanner.

Authors:  Xiangmeng He; Ming Liu; Chao Liu; Jing Fang; Yujun Xu; Ligang Wang; Jianfeng Xiang; Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Chengli Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Thermal ablation of thyroid nodules: are radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and high intensity focused ultrasound equally safe and effective methods?

Authors:  Yücel Korkusuz; Daniel Gröner; Natascha Raczynski; Oleg Relin; Yasmina Kingeter; Frank Grünwald; Christian Happel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Lung MRI of invasive fungal infection at 3 Tesla: evaluation of five different pulse sequences and comparison with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

Authors:  Chenggong Yan; Xiangliang Tan; Qi Wei; Ru Feng; Caixia Li; Yuankui Wu; Peng Hao; Queenie Chan; Wei Xiong; Jun Xu; Yikai Xu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Phase Contrast Imaging Based Microbubble Monitoring of Radiofrequency Ablation: An ex vivo Study.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Jian Lu; Rongbiao Tang; Zhiyuan Wu; Qingbing Wang; Xiaoyi Ding; Zhongmin Wang; Kemin Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Accurate field mapping in the presence of B0 inhomogeneities, applied to MR thermometry.

Authors:  Chang-Sheng Mei; Renxin Chu; W Scott Hoge; Lawrence P Panych; Bruno Madore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  1.0 T open-configuration magnetic resonance-guided microwave ablation of pig livers in real time.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Liang Zhang; Wang Li; Siyue Mao; Yiqi Wang; Deling Wang; Lujun Shen; Annan Dong; Peihong Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  MRI-guided percutaneous thermoablation in combination with hepatic resection as parenchyma-sparing approach in patients with primary and secondary hepatic malignancies: single center long-term experience.

Authors:  Moritz T Winkelmann; Rami Archid; Georg Gohla; Gerald Hefferman; Jens Kübler; Jakob Weiss; Stephan Clasen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Silvio Nadalin; Rüdiger Hoffmann
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  MR-Guided High-Power Microwave Ablation in Hepatic Malignancies: Initial Results in Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Moritz T Winkelmann; Georg Gohla; Jens Kübler; Jakob Weiß; Stephan Clasen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Rüdiger Hoffmann
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.740

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.