Literature DB >> 23399782

Exploration of in vivo efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine against uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in under fives in Tabora region, Tanzania.

Deokary Joseph1, Abdunoor M Kabanywanyi, Ruth Hulser, Zulfiqarali Premji, Omary Ms Minzi, Kefas Mugittu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tanzania adopted artemether-lumefantrine (AL) as first-line drug for uncomplicated malaria in 2006. Recently, there was an anecdotal report on high malaria recurrence rate following AL treatment in in the (urban and peri-urban), western part of Tanzania. The current report is an exploratory study to carefully and systematically assess AL efficacy in the area.
METHODS: Between June and August 2011, a total of 1,126 patients were screened for malaria, 33 had malaria, of which 20 patients met inclusion criteria and were enrolled and treated with standard dose of AL as recommended in the WHO protocol. Treated patients were followed up for 28 days to assess treatment responses. Before treatment (Day 0) and post-treatment (Day 7) plasma lumefantrine levels were determined to assess prior AL use and ascertain parasites exposure to adequate plasma leveles of lumefantrine, respectively.
RESULTS: The cure rate was 100%. All Day 0 plasma lumefantrine were below HPLC detectable level. The median Day 7 lumefantrine concentration was 404, (range, 189-894 ng/ml). Six out of 20 patients (30%) were gametocytaemic and all cleared gametocytes by Day 14. One patient showed an increase in gametocytes from four on Day 0 to 68, per 500 WBC on Day 2.
CONCLUSION: Artemether lumefantrine is highly efficacious against uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The elevation of gametocytaemia despite AL treatment needs to be evaluated in a larger study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23399782      PMCID: PMC3637145          DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malar J        ISSN: 1475-2875            Impact factor:   2.979


Background

The adoption of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in sub-Saharan Africa as first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria [1] was largely based on experience gained in low transmission areas of Southeast Asia using artesunate-mefloquine (AS-MQ) [2]. The few studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa prior to adoption of AS+AQ and AL recorded nearly 100% cure rate [3,4]. However, the long-term impact and extended useful therapeutic life of these drug combinations in high transmission areas remains unclear. Already increased parasite clearance half-life and reduced susceptibility to artemisinins and artesunate-mefloquine has been reported in Thai-Cambodia and Thai-Myanmar boarder [5,6]. Indeed there is now both phenotypic [7] and genetic [8] evidence of artemisinin resistance in these areas. It is hypothesized that if not controlled, artemisinin resistance might eventually spread all over the malaria-endemic world. Thus WHO recommends increased monitoring and surveillance to evaluate the threat of artemisinin resistance and identify new foci rapidly and to provide information for immediate and comprehensive containment and prevention activities. Therefore, this exploratory study was carried out as an action plan in response to reports of high recurrent rate following AL treatment in Tabora, western Tanzania (pers comm, Dr Ruth Hulser, St Phillip’s Health Centre, Tabora) in order to rule out possibility of AL resistance in the region.

Methods

Study site, design, sampling frame and sample size

An in vivo study was carried out between mid-June and mid-August 2011 at Kitete Regional Hospital and St. Philip’s and St Anne’s health facilities serving the urban and peri-urban areas of Tabora municipality. Tabora is a high-burden area and malaria transmission peaks during the rain season, i.e., February to May [9]. Children aged six to 59 months reporting to the hospital with fever or history of fever underwent physical and clinical examination by the study clinician. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are as described in the WHO protocol for high transmission areas [10]. The recruited patients were treated under supervision with a standard six doses of dispersible formulation of AL (Coartem®, Novartis) with full cream milk. The first dose was given at the health centre by a study nurse or clinician and the subsequent doses were given at home by a parent or guardian and monitored by study personnel through mobile phone call or home visits if the parent/guardian was not reachable by mobile phone. Three children vomited within 30 min of first dose and replacement dose was given and no patient vomited a replaced dose. The clinical and parasitological responses were assessed on Day 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 during the 28-day follow-up period. Parasitological responses were assessed microscopically by counting against 200 or 500 white blood cells for asexual and sexual (gametocytes), respectively. Gametocytes were not staged. Admittedly, one major limitation is that microscopy understimates the prevalence of gametocytes. Plasma lumefantrine levels were determined before treatment (Day 0) and post-treatment (Day 7). In the three months, of 1,126 children screened 33 had malaria and only 20 met the inclusion criteria and were recruited (Figure 1), following the recommendations of at least 12 patients per treatment for an exploratory study [11]. The primary efficacy endpoints were classified as: early treatment failure (ETF), late clinical failure (LCF), late parasitological failure (LPF) and adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) on 28 days’ follow-up period [12]. There was no loss to follow up despite the fact that some patients came as far as 10 km away from the health facilities.
Figure 1

Study profile. Key: “Complete study” represents children who had been followed up to Day 28; ETF = early treatment failure; LCF = late clinical failure; LPF = late parasitological failure; ACPR = adequate clinical and parasitological responses; BS = blood smear.

Study profile. Key: “Complete study” represents children who had been followed up to Day 28; ETF = early treatment failure; LCF = late clinical failure; LPF = late parasitological failure; ACPR = adequate clinical and parasitological responses; BS = blood smear.

Determination of plasma lumefantrine levels

From each recruited patient, 2 ml venous blood was collected into heparinized vacutainers on Day 0 and Day 7 for plasma drug level determination. The plasma was separated from blood cells by centrifugation, transferred into 2 ml cryovials and stored in liquid nitrogen. All plasma samples were sent to Muhimbili University College of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) laboratory for lumefantrine level analysis by high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method as described [12]. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by Ethical Review Committee of the Ifakara Health Institute (IHI) and MUHAS. Prior to the trial, a written consent form was signed by the parent or guardian of each participating child.

Results

Study profile and treatment outcome

A total number of 1,126 patients were screened from the three health facilities in Tabora region as follows: St Philip’s Health Centre: n= 663; St Anne’s Health Centre: n=345; and, Kitete Regional Hospital: n=118. The baseline characteristics of the study participants are indicated in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study participants

 nMinimumMaximumMeanStd Deviation
Age (months)
20
6.00
59.00
39.3500
18.65
Weight (Kg)
20
6.7
23.4
14.9
4.5
Temp(0C)
20
35.3
39.7
37.8
1.4
Par./200 wbc
20
56
3577
985
986
Parasites/μl
20
2240
143,080
39,400
39450
Hb (g/dl)206.312.99.11.7
Baseline characteristics of the study participants Twenty-four (24) out of 663 (3.6%), five out of 345 (1.4%) and four out of 118 (3.4%) patients in St Phillip’s, St Anne’s Health Centres and Ketete Hospital, respectively, were positive for malaria parasites by microscopy. Comparison of routine (before the study) and expert (during the study) malaria diagnosis was done. The routine and expert malaria microscopy results recorded in the first (50.3% positive n=163) and second half (5.1% positive n=176) of June 2011, respectively, were significantly different (p < 0.005). Only 20 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Patients were treated and assessed for treatment outcome without loss of follow up as detailed in Figure 1. The cure rate of the drug was 100%. Table 2 shows that the mean haemoglobin was significantly increased, from 9.1 (±1.69) g/dL on Day 0 to 9.6 g/dL (±1.62) on Day 7 (p=0.048).
Table 2

Haemoglobin levels on Day 0 and Day 7

 NMinimumMaximumMeanStd Deviation
Day 0 Hb(in g/dl)
20
6.30
12.9
9.14
1.69
Day 7 Hb (g/dl)206.9012.709.641.62
Haemoglobin levels on Day 0 and Day 7

Plasma lumefantrine levels of patients

The lumefantrine plasma concentrations measured in patients before drug administration in all 20 enrolled patients were below HPLC detection level. The median Day 7 lumefantrine concentration level was 404.4 ng/ml (range 189.4-894.3 ng/ml). Only four (20%) patients had lumefantrine plasma concentration level < 280 ng/ml, and no patient had lumefantrine plasma concentration level <175 ng/ml. Lumefantrine concentration at day 7 was slightly decreased with unit increase in weight (kg) for any age but this decrease was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.445).

Gametocyte prevalence

Table 3 shows gametocytaemia before and after AL treatment. Six of the 20 patients (30%) had gametocytes under microscopic observation on Day 0 and all were above 36 months of age. In five patients the gametocytes persisted up to Day 7 after treatment and one patient had gametocytes up to Day 14 and one had gametoctes only on Day 0. One patient showed an increase in gametocytes after treatment from four gametocytes per 500 WBC on Day 0 to 68 gametocytes per 500 WBC on Day 2 followed by a decrease on subsequent days after treatment. No gametocytes were seen microscopically after Day 14.
Table 3

Presence of gametocytes in six children by time

Patient (ID)Age (months)Number of gametocytes per 500 WBC
Day 0Day 2Day3Day 7D ay 14Day 21Day 28
1
59
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
48
4
68
43
5
0
0
0
4
59
145
123
85
28
0
0
0
10
50
6
4
5
2
0
0
0
16
36
13
10
7
4
0
0
0
205911322200
Presence of gametocytes in six children by time

Discussion

Artemisinins are known to be highly potent anti-malarial drugs that are active against immature gametocytes [13,14], hence pivotal in reduction of malaria transmission and elimination/eradication agenda. To the best of authors’ knowledge, there is no evidence of clinical resistance to AL. However tolerance or increased parasite clearence time and reduced susceptibility to artemisinins and artesunate-mefloquine has been observed in Thai-Cambodia and Thai-Mynmar boarder [5,6]. This is the same locus where chloroquine resistance first emerged and subsequently spread all over the world. Emergence of artermisinin resistance would be disastrous for global malaria control. Therefore, regular surveillance and prompt response to any indication of compromised efficacy is required [15]. This study recorded high (100%) efficacy of AL. The reported efficacy level is more or less similar to >98% recorded in Tanzania, prior to introduction of AL [4], and elsewere in Africa [16-20]. However, in these other studies, the high efficacy rates were reached after exclusion of new infection by molecular genotyping. Therefore, it is obvious that the cause of alarm that prompted this exploratory study in Tabora was not malaria recurrence or compromised AL efficacy but malaria overdiagnosis. This practice has been reported previously elsewhere in Africa [21,22] as a cause of inappropriate malaria case managment [23]. Overdiagnosis is attributable to incompetency of laboratory workers, work overload, and pressure from patients with fever accepting malaria diagnosis [21]. In this study, none of the patients reported to have taken AL prior to hospital presentation, which was confirmed by lack of lumefantrine traces in the plasma. In addition, all patients had adequate therapautic levels of lumefantrine on Day 7. However, the Day 7 plasma lumefantrine levels showed wide variation between individuals. Indeed, it is known that the efficacy of AL combination is strongly influenced by wide variation in the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine among individuals [24]. The maximum therapeutic cure rate is achieved when the plasma drug concentration is adequately available for at least three parasite life cycles that is equal to six days [25]. The impact of pharmacokinetic variation on selection for resistance to residual parasites in high transmission areas needs to be carefully evaluated. Artemether-lumefantrine showed short fever and parasites clearence time and quick recovery of haemoglobin levels. Only one patient had fever up to Day 1 and neither fever nor parasitaemia was reported on Day 2, contrary to a report in central Ethiopia where fever and parasitaemia persisted to Day 3 [26]. Haemoglobin levels significantly increased on Day 7 as reported in other studies in this region, but the second haemoglobin measurement was done on Day 14 [27,28]. The complete 28 days’ follow up to all patients was achieved by using mobile phone calls to remind parents or guardians about their appointment dates and days. Mobile phone contacts might minimize loss to follow up in efficacy studies. The Day 0 gametocyte prevalence (30%) recorded in this study is higher compared with those reported previously in Tanzania [29,30]. Furthermore, as observed elsewhere in Africa [27,31-33], no new gametocytaemic cases were observed during the follow-up period. Admittedly, this could be attributable to small sample size, which is a limitation of this study, and microscopy detection limit. Gametocytaemia persisted for seven to 14 days, (as recorded previously), against 55 days for non-ACT drugs [34]. ACT is effective against immature sequestered gametocytes [32,34,35], hence they reduce gametocyte carriage as well as gametocytes density [31,36,37]. Apparently, ACT does not affect the viability of mature gametocytes [31,36]. Consequently, persistence of mature gametocytes might still play a role on maintianing transmission cycle. Hence, combination with a strong gametocytocidal drug such as primaquine will maximize ACT usefulness. The phenomenon of increase in gametocytaemia in this study and of sexual stage count in Nigeria [38] despite drug treatment, might be a sign of tolerance or emergence of parasites with reduced drug sensitivity in the region. Another plausible explanation for the increase in gametocytaemia is coincidence between drug administration and maturation release of mature gametocytes into the peripheral circulation. These observations of increased gametocytaemia after treatment need to be verified in a larger study.

Conclusion

The therapeutic efficacy of AL against uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria was high in the study area. All patients were not exposed to AL prior to hospital presentation and levels of lumefantrine on Day 7 were therapeutically adequate but highly variable. The unusual increase in gametocytes following treatment needs be evaluated in a larger study concurrent with improvement capacity to diagnose malaria and handling of non-malarial fevers.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

KM, AM and ZP designed the study. KM and DJ supervised the field work. SA and AMK and ZP supervised the clinical part. MOMS supervised the drug level analysis and pharmacokinetics. DJ was involved in drug analysis and analysed data. RH is the in charge of St Philip’s Health Centre. DJ and KM wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  32 in total

1.  Preventing antimalarial drug resistance through combinations.

Authors:  N J White
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 18.500

2.  Treatment with coartem (artemether-lumefantrine) in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Sonja Schoepflin; Enmoore Lin; Benson Kiniboro; Jeana T DaRe; Rajeev K Mehlotra; Peter A Zimmerman; Ivo Mueller; Ingrid Felger
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  A major genome region underlying artemisinin resistance in malaria.

Authors:  Ian H Cheeseman; Becky A Miller; Shalini Nair; Standwell Nkhoma; Asako Tan; John C Tan; Salma Al Saai; Aung Pyae Phyo; Carit Ler Moo; Khin Maung Lwin; Rose McGready; Elizabeth Ashley; Mallika Imwong; Kasia Stepniewska; Poravuth Yi; Arjen M Dondorp; Mayfong Mayxay; Paul N Newton; Nicholas J White; François Nosten; Michael T Ferdig; Timothy J C Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Treatment of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria with 3-day artesunate-mefloquine combination.

Authors:  F Nosten; C Luxemburger; F O ter Kuile; C Woodrow; J P Eh; T Chongsuphajaisiddhi; N J White
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

Authors:  Arjen M Dondorp; François Nosten; Poravuth Yi; Debashish Das; Aung Phae Phyo; Joel Tarning; Khin Maung Lwin; Frederic Ariey; Warunee Hanpithakpong; Sue J Lee; Pascal Ringwald; Kamolrat Silamut; Mallika Imwong; Kesinee Chotivanich; Pharath Lim; Trent Herdman; Sen Sam An; Shunmay Yeung; Pratap Singhasivanon; Nicholas P J Day; Niklas Lindegardh; Duong Socheat; Nicholas J White
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Efficacy of three artemisinin combination therapies for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Ingrid van den Broek; Christa Kitz; Sarwatt Al Attas; François Libama; Manica Balasegaram; Jean-Paul Guthmann
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  Reduction of malaria transmission to Anopheles mosquitoes with a six-dose regimen of co-artemether.

Authors:  Colin J Sutherland; Rosalynn Ord; Sam Dunyo; Musa Jawara; Christopher J Drakeley; Neal Alexander; Rosalind Coleman; Margaret Pinder; Gijs Walraven; Geoffrey A T Targett
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Malaria misdiagnosis in Uganda--implications for policy change.

Authors:  Joan Nankabirwa; Dejan Zurovac; Julius N Njogu; John B Rwakimari; Helen Counihan; Robert W Snow; James K Tibenderana
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Therapeutic efficacy of Artemether/Lumefantrine (Coartem(R)) against Plasmodium falciparum in Kersa, South West Ethiopia.

Authors:  Ashenafi Assefa; Moges Kassa; Gemechu Tadese; Hussen Mohamed; Abebe Animut; Tesfayae Mengesha
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Efficacy and tolerability of four antimalarial combinations in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Senegal.

Authors:  Babacar Faye; Jean-Louis Ndiaye; Daouda Ndiaye; Yemou Dieng; Oumar Faye; Oumar Gaye
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 2.979

View more
  8 in total

1.  Semi-quantitative measurement of the antimalarial lumefantrine from untreated dried blood spots using LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Matthew M Ippolito; Liusheng Huang; Mwiche Siame; Philip Thuma; Theresa A Shapiro; Francesca T Aweeka
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.935

2.  Sustained High Cure Rate of Artemether-Lumefantrine against Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria after 8 Years of Its Wide-Scale Use in Bagamoyo District, Tanzania.

Authors:  Richard Mwaiswelo; Billy Ngasala; J Pedro Gil; Maja Malmberg; Irina Jovel; Weiping Xu; Zul Premji; Bruno P Mmbando; Anders Björkman; Andreas Mårtensson
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Southwestern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Seleshi Kebede Mekonnen; Girmay Medhin; Nega Berhe; Ronald M Clouse; Abraham Aseffa
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 4.  Monitoring of efficacy and safety of artemisinin-based anti-malarials for treatment of uncomplicated malaria: a review of evidence of implementation of anti-malarial therapeutic efficacy trials in Tanzania.

Authors:  Alex Shayo; Joram Buza; Deus S Ishengoma
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 5.  A review of the effects of artemether-lumefantrine on gametocyte carriage and disease transmission.

Authors:  Michael Makanga
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Monitoring the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Malawian children.

Authors:  Rosalia Dambe; John Sande; Doreen Ali; Ben Chilima; Wilfred Dodoli; Charles Michelo; Grace Malenga; Kamija S Phiri
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 7.  Therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Biset Ayalew
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.520

8.  Impact of Malaria Control on Mortality and Anemia among Tanzanian Children Less than Five Years of Age, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Paul Smithson; Lia Florey; S Rene Salgado; Christine L Hershey; Honorati Masanja; Achuyt Bhattarai; Alex Mwita; Peter D McElroy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.