| Literature DB >> 23397107 |
Paulina Jaranowska1, Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Magdalena Zielińska.
Abstract
The structure of microbial consortia in wastewater treatment facilities is a resultant ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23397107 PMCID: PMC3683147 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-013-1273-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0959-3993 Impact factor: 3.312
The treatment lines and characteristics of influents and effluents of investigated WWTPs
| WWTP | Pre-settling | Configuration of bioreactors | Chemical P-precipitation | Q (m3/d) | Influent (g/m3) | Effluent (g/m3) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSS | COD | BOD | TKN | P | COD/N | TSS | COD | BOD | N | P | |||||
| LY | No | AxT, AT | No | 360 | nm | 1,114±197 | 736±162 | 96±21 | nm | 12 | nm | nm | nm | nm | nm |
| RA | Yes | AnT, AT | No | 200 | 670±151 | 1,304±281 | 900±182 | 107±14 | nm | 12 | 27±8 | 88±22 | 16±8 | 95±22 | nm |
| OL | Yes | Pre-DT, AnT, SNDT | Periodically | 30,000 | 523±62 | 416±88 | 354±94 | 62±14 | 11±3 | 7 | 5±3 | 37±13 | 5±2 | 21±5 | 1±1 |
| EL | Yes | AxT, AT | Yes | 23,000 | 372±79 | 841±132 | 398±75 | 71±13 | 10±3 | 12 | 7±3 | 42±15 | 4±2 | 6±2 | 1±1 |
| JE | No | AnT, SNDT | No | 4,000 | 425±87 | 1,050±202 | 480±98 | 85±22 | 15±4 | 12 | nm | nm | nm | nm | nm |
| TY | Yes | Pre-DT, AnT, AxT, AT | Periodically | 6,660 | 601±182 | 1,520±375 | 1,005±301 | 110±16 | 19±11 | 14 | 9±5 | 64±17 | 8±5 | 15±4 | 1±1 |
| GT | Yes | AT | Yes | 129 | nm | 696±353 | 452±98 | 78±5 | nm | 9 | nm | nm | nm | nm | nm |
| JO | No | Pre-DT, AT, Post-DT, UF | No | 300 | 572±58 | 1,133±242 | 661±150 | 129±18 | 16±7 | 9 | <0.2 | 28±6 | 2±1 | 3±1 | 6±1 |
| NG | No | AnT, AxT, AT | Yes | 6,300 | 312±97 | 1,019±172 | 408±109 | 74±15 | 11±4 | 14 | 3±2 | 26±7 | 3±2 | 11±2 | 1±1 |
AT aerobic tank, AnT anaerobic tank, AxT anoxic tank, Pre-DT pre-denitrification tank, Post-DT post-denitrification tank, SNDT simultaneous nitrification–denitrification tank, UF ultrafiltration, Q flow rate, TSS total suspended solids, nm not measured
Primers used in the study and DGGE conditions
| Amplicon | Specificity | Primer set | PCR product length (bp) | Reference | Denaturant gradient; percentage of gel | Time and voltage of electrophoresis | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16S rDNA | V3 region within the bacterial 16S rDNA | 341F/515R | ~230 | Muyzer et al. ( | 30–60 %; 6 % | 4 h, 85 V | This study |
|
| Nitrous oxide reducing bacteria | NosZ1/NosZ2 | ~500 | Kloos et al. ( | 40–70 %; 7 % | 7 h, 120 V | This study |
|
| Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria | 301F/302R | ~700 | Norton et al. ( | 30–60 %; 6 % | 4 h, 120 V | Cydzik-Kwiatkowska et al. ( |
| amoA-1F/amoA-2R | ~500 | Rotthauwe et al. ( |
Numerical values assigned to express the number of separate biological processes and the presence of the tanks favoring denitrification in WWTP treatment line
| Process/denitrification tanks | Numerical value | |
|---|---|---|
| Process | Nitrification; carbon removal | 1 |
| Nitrification; denitrification; carbon removal | 2 | |
| Phosphorus removal; nitrification; carbon removal | 2 | |
| Phosphorus removal; simultaneous nitrification/denitrification; carbon removal | 2.5 | |
| Phosphorus removal; nitrification; denitrification; carbon removal | 3 | |
| Denitrification tanks | Lack of separate denitrification tank | 0 |
| Pre-denitrification tank | 0.5 | |
| Post-denitrification tank | 0.5 | |
| Simultaneous nitrification/denitrification tank | 0.75 | |
| Separated denitrification tank | 1 |
Numerical values expressing denitrification tank presence and the number of processes realized in WWTPs taken for the CCA
| WWTP | DT | PR |
|---|---|---|
| LY | 1 | 2 |
| RA | 0 | 2 |
| OL | 1.25 | 2.5 |
| EL | 1 | 2 |
| JE | 0.75 | 2.5 |
| TY | 1.5 | 3 |
| GT | 0 | 1 |
| JO | 1 | 2 |
| NG | 1 | 3 |
Fig. 1The DGGE analysis of PCR amplifications of the partial amoA gene. The abbreviations above each lane represent the WWTP the activated sludge samples were taken from. The bands that were sequenced are marked with capital letters
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of the partial amoA gene sequences to reference the sequences from GeneBank database (accession numbers given in parentheses). The sequence of band A is given in Supplementary material. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model (Tamura and Nei 1993). Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically as follows. When the number of common sites was <100 or less than one fourth of the total number of sites, the maximum parsimony method was used; otherwise the BIONJ method with MCL distance matrix was applied. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in the MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011)
Fig. 3The CCA of a total b N2O-reducing and c ammonia-oxidizing bacteria communities; the discrete (triangle) (IN ± = the presence/absence of industrial wastewater in the influent) and the continuous variables (right arrow) (the COD/N and BOD/COD ratios of the influent, COD and TKN in the influent, DT—presence of the denitrification tanks, PR—the number of the processes realized in the biological treatment line of WWTP)
Fig. 4The average number of 16S rDNA, nosZ, amoA bands in the DGGE patterns characterizing activated sludge communities from analyzed WWTPs; the averages of two different measurements, standard deviations are given