Literature DB >> 23397036

Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes.

Marnix Naber1, Stefan Frässle, Ueli Rutishauser, Wolfgang Einhäuser.   

Abstract

Declarative memories of personal experiences are a key factor in defining oneself as an individual, which becomes particularly evident when this capability is impaired. Assessing the physiological mechanisms of human declarative memory is typically restricted to patients with specific lesions and requires invasive brain access or functional imaging. We investigated whether the pupil, an accessible physiological measure, can be utilized to probe memories for complex natural visual scenes. During memory encoding, scenes that were later remembered elicited a stronger pupil constriction compared to scenes that were later forgotten. Thus, pupil size predicts success or failure of memory formation. In contrast, novel scenes elicited stronger pupil constriction than familiar scenes during retrieval. When viewing previously memorized scenes, those that were forgotten (misjudged as novel) still elicited stronger pupil constrictions than those correctly judged as familiar. Furthermore, pupil constriction was influenced more strongly if images were judged with high confidence. Thus, we propose that pupil constriction can serve as a marker of novelty. Since stimulus novelty modulates the efficacy of memory formation, our pupil measurements during learning indicate that the later forgotten images were perceived as less novel than the later remembered pictures. Taken together, our data provide evidence that pupil constriction is a physiological correlate of a neural novelty signal during formation and retrieval of declarative memories for complex, natural scenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397036     DOI: 10.1167/13.2.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  27 in total

1.  Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness.

Authors:  Hsin-I Liao; Shunsuke Kidani; Makoto Yoneya; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Pupil-Linked Arousal Responds to Unconscious Surprisal.

Authors:  Andrea Alamia; Rufin VanRullen; Emanuele Pasqualotto; André Mouraux; Alexandre Zenon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias.

Authors:  Jan Willem de Gee; Tomas Knapen; Tobias H Donner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pupil dilation as an indicator of future thinking.

Authors:  Mohamad El Haj; Ahmed A Moustafa
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Pupillary correlates of individual differences in long-term memory.

Authors:  Matthew K Robison; Jamie M Trost; Daniel Schor; Bradley S Gibson; M Karl Healey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 6.  Getting directions from the hippocampus: The neural connection between looking and memory.

Authors:  Miriam L R Meister; Elizabeth A Buffalo
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  How to become a mentalist: reading decisions from a competitor's pupil can be achieved without training but requires instruction.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Josef Stoll; Wolfgang Einhäuser; Olivia Carter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Human Pupillary Dilation Response to Deviant Auditory Stimuli: Effects of Stimulus Properties and Voluntary Attention.

Authors:  Hsin-I Liao; Makoto Yoneya; Shunsuke Kidani; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; George A Alvarez; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-10

10.  Cognitive and Ocular Factors Jointly Determine Pupil Responses under Equiluminance.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Jan Willem de Gee; Jan Brascamp; Stijn Nuiten; Sylco Hoppenbrouwers; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.