BACKGROUND:Left ventricular (LV) wall stress reduction is a cornerstone in treating heart failure. Large animal models and computer simulations indicate that adding non-contractile material to the damaged LV wall can potentially reduce myofiber stress. We sought to quantify the effects of a novel implantable hydrogel (Algisyl-LVR™) treatment in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting (i.e. Algisyl-LVR™+CABG) on both LV function and wall stress in heart failure patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Magnetic resonance images obtained before treatment (n=3), and at 3 months (n=3) and 6 months (n=2) afterwards were used to reconstruct the LV geometry. Cardiac function was quantified using end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), regional wall thickness, sphericity index and regional myofiber stress computed using validated mathematical modeling. The LV became more ellipsoidal after treatment, and both EDV and ESV decreased substantially 3 months after treatment in all patients; EDV decreased from 264 ± 91 ml to 146 ± 86 ml and ESV decreased from 184 ± 85 ml to 86 ± 76 ml. Ejection fraction increased from 32 ± 8% to 47 ± 18% during that period. Volumetric-averaged wall thickness increased in all patients, from 1.06 ± 0.21 cm (baseline) to 1.3 ± 0.26 cm (3 months). These changes were accompanied by about a 35% decrease in myofiber stress at end-of-diastole and at end-of-systole. Post-treatment myofiber stress became more uniform in the LV. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the novel concept that Algisyl-LVR™+CABG treatment leads to decreased myofiber stress, restored LV geometry and improved function.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) wall stress reduction is a cornerstone in treating heart failure. Large animal models and computer simulations indicate that adding non-contractile material to the damaged LV wall can potentially reduce myofiber stress. We sought to quantify the effects of a novel implantable hydrogel (Algisyl-LVR™) treatment in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting (i.e. Algisyl-LVR™+CABG) on both LV function and wall stress in heart failurepatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Magnetic resonance images obtained before treatment (n=3), and at 3 months (n=3) and 6 months (n=2) afterwards were used to reconstruct the LV geometry. Cardiac function was quantified using end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), regional wall thickness, sphericity index and regional myofiber stress computed using validated mathematical modeling. The LV became more ellipsoidal after treatment, and both EDV and ESV decreased substantially 3 months after treatment in all patients; EDV decreased from 264 ± 91 ml to 146 ± 86 ml and ESV decreased from 184 ± 85 ml to 86 ± 76 ml. Ejection fraction increased from 32 ± 8% to 47 ± 18% during that period. Volumetric-averaged wall thickness increased in all patients, from 1.06 ± 0.21 cm (baseline) to 1.3 ± 0.26 cm (3 months). These changes were accompanied by about a 35% decrease in myofiber stress at end-of-diastole and at end-of-systole. Post-treatment myofiber stress became more uniform in the LV. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the novel concept that Algisyl-LVR™+CABG treatment leads to decreased myofiber stress, restored LV geometry and improved function.
Authors: Eugene A Grossi; Nirav Patel; Y Joseph Woo; Judith D Goldberg; Charles F Schwartz; Valavanur Subramanian; Ted Feldman; Robert Bourge; Norbert Baumgartner; Christopher Genco; Scott Goldman; Marco Zenati; J Alan Wolfe; Yugal K Mishra; Naresh Trehan; Sanjay Mittal; Shulian Shang; Todd J Mortier; Cyril J Schweich Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Samuel T Wall; Joseph C Walker; Kevin E Healy; Mark B Ratcliffe; Julius M Guccione Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-11-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kay Sun; Zhihong Zhang; Takamaro Suzuki; Jonathan F Wenk; Nielen Stander; Daniel R Einstein; David A Saloner; Arthur W Wallace; Julius M Guccione; Mark B Ratcliffe Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jonathan F Wenk; Samuel T Wall; Robert C Peterson; Sam L Helgerson; Hani N Sabbah; Mike Burger; Nielen Stander; Mark B Ratcliffe; Julius M Guccione Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Zhihong Zhang; Amod Tendulkar; Kay Sun; David A Saloner; Arthur W Wallace; Liang Ge; Julius M Guccione; Mark B Ratcliffe Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Robert H Jones; Eric J Velazquez; Robert E Michler; George Sopko; Jae K Oh; Christopher M O'Connor; James A Hill; Lorenzo Menicanti; Zygmunt Sadowski; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Jean-Lucien Rouleau; Kerry L Lee Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-03-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roni B Prucz; Eric S Weiss; Nishant D Patel; Lois U Nwakanma; William A Baumgartner; John V Conte Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Choon-Sik Jhun; Jonathan F Wenk; Zhihong Zhang; Samuel T Wall; Kay Sun; Hani N Sabbah; Mark B Ratcliffe; Julius M Guccione Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: John W MacArthur; Amanda N Steele; Andrew B Goldstone; Jeffrey E Cohen; William Hiesinger; Y Joseph Woo Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2017-04
Authors: Jun Fang; Jaekyung Koh; Qizhi Fang; Huiliang Qiu; Maani M Archang; Mohammad Mahdi Hasani-Sadrabadi; Hiromi Miwa; Xintong Zhong; Richard Sievers; Dong-Wei Gao; Randall Lee; Dino Di Carlo; Song Li Journal: Adv Funct Mater Date: 2020-09-06 Impact factor: 18.808
Authors: Kevin L Sack; Eric Aliotta; Jenny S Choy; Daniel B Ennis; Neil H Davies; Thomas Franz; Ghassan S Kassab; Julius M Guccione Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: M Genet; M K Rausch; L C Lee; S Choy; X Zhao; G S Kassab; S Kozerke; J M Guccione; E Kuhl Journal: J Biomech Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 2.712