Literature DB >> 19231332

Effects of surgical ventricular restoration on left ventricular contractility assessed by a novel contractility index in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Liang Zhong1, Srikanth Sola, Ru-San Tan, Thu-Thao Le, Dhanjoo N Ghista, Vikram Kurra, Jose L Navia, Ghassan S Kassab.   

Abstract

A pressure-normalized left ventricular (LV) wall stress (dsigma*/dt(max)) was recently reported as a load-independent index of LV contractility. We hypothesized that this novel contractility index might demonstrate improvement in LV contractile function after surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) using magnetic resonance imaging. A retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging data of 40 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting with SVR was performed. LV volumes, ejection fraction, global systolic and diastolic sphericity, and dsigma*/dt(max) were calculated. After SVR, a decrease was found in end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes, whereas LV ejection fraction increased from 26% +/- 7% to 31% +/- 10% (p <0.001). LV mass index and peak normalized wall stress were decreased, whereas the sphericity index (SI) at end-diastole increased, indicating that the left ventricle became more spherical after SVR. LV contractility index dsigma*/dt(max) improvement (from 2.69 +/- 0.74 to 3.23 +/- 0.73 s(-1), p <0.001) was associated with shape change as evaluated by the difference in SI between diastole and systole (r = 0.32, p <0.001, preoperative; r = 0.23, p <0.001, postoperative), but not with baseline LV SI. In conclusion, SVR excludes akinetic LV segments and decreases LV wall stress. Despite an increase in sphericity, LV contractility, as determined by dsigma*/dt(max), actually improves. A complex interaction of LV maximal flow rate and LV mass may explain the improvement in LV contractility after SVR. Because dsigma*/dt(max) can be estimated from simple noninvasive measurements, this underscores its clinical utility for assessment of contractile function with therapeutic intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19231332     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Impact of surgical ventricular restoration on ventricular shape, wall stress, and function in heart failure patients.

Authors:  L Zhong; Y Su; L Gobeawan; S Sola; R-S Tan; J L Navia; D N Ghista; T Chua; J Guccione; G S Kassab
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Increased ascending aortic wall stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  Derek P Nathan; Chun Xu; Ted Plappert; Benoit Desjardins; Joseph H Gorman; Joseph E Bavaria; Robert C Gorman; Krishnan B Chandran; Benjamin M Jackson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Algisyl-LVR™ with coronary artery bypass grafting reduces left ventricular wall stress and improves function in the failing human heart.

Authors:  Lik Chuan Lee; Samuel T Wall; Doron Klepach; Liang Ge; Zhihong Zhang; Randall J Lee; Andy Hinson; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Julius M Guccione
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Analysis of patient-specific surgical ventricular restoration: importance of an ellipsoidal left ventricular geometry for diastolic and systolic function.

Authors:  Lik Chuan Lee; Jonathan F Wenk; Liang Zhong; Doron Klepach; Zhihong Zhang; Liang Ge; Mark B Ratcliffe; Tarek I Zohdi; Edward Hsu; Jose L Navia; Ghassan S Kassab; Julius M Guccione
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-05-02

Review 5.  Computational medical imaging and hemodynamics framework for functional analysis and assessment of cardiovascular structures.

Authors:  Kelvin K L Wong; Defeng Wang; Jacky K L Ko; Jagannath Mazumdar; Thu-Thao Le; Dhanjoo Ghista
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Left Ventricular Wall Stress Is Sensitive Marker of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Xiaodan Zhao; Ru-San Tan; Hak-Chiaw Tang; Soo-Kng Teo; Yi Su; Min Wan; Shuang Leng; Jun-Mei Zhang; John Allen; Ghassan S Kassab; Liang Zhong
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.