BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a heterogeneous, highly aggressive primary brain tumor with strongly variable patient survival. Because reliable prognostic biomarkers are lacking, we investigated the relation between telomerase-associated parameters and the disease course. METHODS: Telomerase-associated parameters were determined in 100 GBM tissues and associated with clinical characteristics and overall survival. Expressions of telomere length, telomerase activity (TA), and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) were analyzed by quantitative PCR, telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay, and reverse transcriptase-PCR, respectively. Mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 was determined by direct sequencing, and O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation by methylation-specific PCR. RESULTS: Of 100 GBM tissues, 61 were positive for both hTERT mRNA and TA, with a highly significant correlation between both parameters (linear regression, P < .0001). Telomere length determination revealed a significant difference between the hTERT/TA-positive and -negative subgroups, with markedly longer telomeres in the hTERT/TA-negative cohort (unpaired Student's t-test, P = .0001). Accordingly, significantly shorter telomeres were detected in GBM tissues derived from older patients (>60 y at diagnosis, P < .0001). While no association of telomere parameters with MGMT promoter status was found, all tumors with IDH1 mutation (6/100) were negative for both hTERT expression and TA and harbored significantly longer telomeres. Patients with tumors lacking hTERT expression/TA showed a significant survival benefit (Kaplan-Meier test, both P < .01), which, however, was based exclusively on the younger patient subgroup (≤60 y, both P < .005; >60 y, both ns). CONCLUSIONS: Telomerase activation is not an independent prognostic parameter in GBM but predicts aggressive tumor behavior solely in a younger patient cohort.
BACKGROUND:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a heterogeneous, highly aggressive primary brain tumor with strongly variable patient survival. Because reliable prognostic biomarkers are lacking, we investigated the relation between telomerase-associated parameters and the disease course. METHODS: Telomerase-associated parameters were determined in 100 GBM tissues and associated with clinical characteristics and overall survival. Expressions of telomere length, telomerase activity (TA), and humantelomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) were analyzed by quantitative PCR, telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay, and reverse transcriptase-PCR, respectively. Mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 was determined by direct sequencing, and O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation by methylation-specific PCR. RESULTS: Of 100 GBM tissues, 61 were positive for both hTERT mRNA and TA, with a highly significant correlation between both parameters (linear regression, P < .0001). Telomere length determination revealed a significant difference between the hTERT/TA-positive and -negative subgroups, with markedly longer telomeres in the hTERT/TA-negative cohort (unpaired Student's t-test, P = .0001). Accordingly, significantly shorter telomeres were detected in GBM tissues derived from older patients (>60 y at diagnosis, P < .0001). While no association of telomere parameters with MGMT promoter status was found, all tumors with IDH1 mutation (6/100) were negative for both hTERT expression and TA and harbored significantly longer telomeres. Patients with tumors lacking hTERT expression/TA showed a significant survival benefit (Kaplan-Meier test, both P < .01), which, however, was based exclusively on the younger patient subgroup (≤60 y, both P < .005; >60 y, both ns). CONCLUSIONS: Telomerase activation is not an independent prognostic parameter in GBM but predicts aggressive tumor behavior solely in a younger patient cohort.
Authors: V Hakin-Smith; D A Jellinek; D Levy; T Carroll; M Teo; W R Timperley; M J McKay; R R Reddel; J A Royds Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-03-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Monika E Hegi; Annie-Claire Diserens; Thierry Gorlia; Marie-France Hamou; Nicolas de Tribolet; Michael Weller; Johan M Kros; Johannes A Hainfellner; Warren Mason; Luigi Mariani; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Peter Hau; René O Mirimanoff; J Gregory Cairncross; Robert C Janzer; Roger Stupp Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maria Laura Falchetti; Francesco Pierconti; Patrizia Casalbore; Nicola Maggiano; Andrea Levi; Luigi Maria Larocca; Roberto Pallini Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: N W Kim; M A Piatyszek; K R Prowse; C B Harley; M D West; P L Ho; G M Coviello; W E Wright; S L Weinrich; J W Shay Journal: Science Date: 1994-12-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Monika E Hegi; Annie-Claire Diserens; Sophie Godard; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Luca Regli; Sandrine Ostermann; Philippe Otten; Guy Van Melle; Nicolas de Tribolet; Roger Stupp Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: João Vinagre; Vasco Pinto; Ricardo Celestino; Marta Reis; Helena Pópulo; Paula Boaventura; Miguel Melo; Telmo Catarino; Jorge Lima; José Manuel Lopes; Valdemar Máximo; Manuel Sobrinho-Simões; Paula Soares Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: C Lavanya; Manjunatha M Venkataswamy; M K Sibin; M M Srinivas Bharath; G K Chetan Journal: Cytotechnology Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 2.058