BACKGROUND: Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can be efficiently and reproducibly directed into cardiomyocytes (CMs) using stage-specific induction protocols. However, their functional properties and suitability for clinical and other applications have not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here we showed that CMs derived from multiple pluripotent human stem cell lines (hESC: H1, HES2) and types (induced pluripotent stem cell) using different in vitro differentiation protocols (embryoid body formation, endodermal induction, directed differentiation) commonly displayed immature, proarrhythmic action potential properties such as high degree of automaticity, depolarized resting membrane potential, Phase 4- depolarization, and delayed after-depolarization. Among the panoply of sarcolemmal ionic currents investigated (I(Na)(+)/I(CaL)(+)/I(Kr)(+)/I(NCX)(+)/I(f)(+)/I(to)(+)/I(K1)(-)/I(Ks)(-)), we pinpointed the lack of the Kir2.1-encoded inwardly rectifying K(+) current (I(K1)) as the single mechanistic contributor to the observed immature electrophysiological properties in hESC-CMs. Forced expression of Kir2.1 in hESC-CMs led to robust expression of Ba(2+)-sensitive I(K1) and, more importantly, completely ablated all the proarrhythmic action potential traits, rendering the electrophysiological phenotype indistinguishable from the adult counterparts. These results provided the first link of a complex developmentally arrested phenotype to a major effector gene, and importantly, further led us to develop a bio-mimetic culturing strategy for enhancing maturation. CONCLUSIONS: By providing the environmental cues that are missing in conventional culturing method, this approach did not require any genetic or pharmacological interventions. Our findings can facilitate clinical applications, drug discovery, and cardiotoxicity screening by improving the yield, safety, and efficacy of derived CMs.
BACKGROUND:Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can be efficiently and reproducibly directed into cardiomyocytes (CMs) using stage-specific induction protocols. However, their functional properties and suitability for clinical and other applications have not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here we showed that CMs derived from multiple pluripotent human stem cell lines (hESC: H1, HES2) and types (induced pluripotent stem cell) using different in vitro differentiation protocols (embryoid body formation, endodermal induction, directed differentiation) commonly displayed immature, proarrhythmic action potential properties such as high degree of automaticity, depolarized resting membrane potential, Phase 4- depolarization, and delayed after-depolarization. Among the panoply of sarcolemmal ionic currents investigated (I(Na)(+)/I(CaL)(+)/I(Kr)(+)/I(NCX)(+)/I(f)(+)/I(to)(+)/I(K1)(-)/I(Ks)(-)), we pinpointed the lack of the Kir2.1-encoded inwardly rectifying K(+) current (I(K1)) as the single mechanistic contributor to the observed immature electrophysiological properties in hESC-CMs. Forced expression of Kir2.1 in hESC-CMs led to robust expression of Ba(2+)-sensitive I(K1) and, more importantly, completely ablated all the proarrhythmic action potential traits, rendering the electrophysiological phenotype indistinguishable from the adult counterparts. These results provided the first link of a complex developmentally arrested phenotype to a major effector gene, and importantly, further led us to develop a bio-mimetic culturing strategy for enhancing maturation. CONCLUSIONS: By providing the environmental cues that are missing in conventional culturing method, this approach did not require any genetic or pharmacological interventions. Our findings can facilitate clinical applications, drug discovery, and cardiotoxicity screening by improving the yield, safety, and efficacy of derived CMs.
Authors: Trine Krogh-Madsen; Peter Schaffer; Anne D Skriver; Louise Kold Taylor; Brigitte Pelzmann; Bernd Koidl; Michael R Guevara Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2005-02-11 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: J A Thomson; J Itskovitz-Eldor; S S Shapiro; M A Waknitz; J J Swiergiel; V S Marshall; J M Jones Journal: Science Date: 1998-11-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Lei Yang; Mark H Soonpaa; Eric D Adler; Torsten K Roepke; Steven J Kattman; Marion Kennedy; Els Henckaerts; Kristina Bonham; Geoffrey W Abbott; R Michael Linden; Loren J Field; Gordon M Keller Journal: Nature Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kenneth R Boheler; Robert N Joodi; Hui Qiao; Ondrej Juhasz; Amanda L Urick; Sandra L Chuppa; Rebekah L Gundry; Robert P Wersto; Rong Zhou Journal: Stem Cells Int Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 5.443
Authors: Ashley H Fong; Mónica Romero-López; Christopher M Heylman; Mark Keating; David Tran; Agua Sobrino; Anh Q Tran; Hiep H Pham; Cristhian Fimbres; Paul D Gershon; Elliot L Botvinick; Steven C George; Christopher C W Hughes Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Jong J Kim; Lei Yang; Bo Lin; Xiaodong Zhu; Bin Sun; Aaron D Kaplan; Glenna C L Bett; Randall L Rasmusson; Barry London; Guy Salama Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Maggie Zi Ying Chow; Lin Geng; Chi-Wing Kong; Wendy Keung; Jacky Chun-Kit Fung; Kenneth R Boheler; Ronald A Li Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Ravi Vaidyanathan; Yogananda S Markandeya; Timothy J Kamp; Jonathan C Makielski; Craig T January; Lee L Eckhardt Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 4.733