Literature DB >> 23392472

Postural coordination patterns as a function of rhythmical dynamics of the surface of support.

Ji-Hyun Ko1, John H Challis, Karl M Newell.   

Abstract

This study investigated the organization of postural coordination patterns as a function of the rhythmical dynamics of the surface of support. We examined how the number and nature of the dynamical degrees of freedom in the movement coordination patterns changed as a function of the amplitude and frequency of support surface motion. Young adult subjects stood on a moving platform that was translated sinusoidally in anterior-posterior (AP) direction with the task goal to maintain upright bipedal postural balance. A force platform measured the kinetics at the surface of support and a 3D motion analysis system recorded torso and joint kinematics. Principal components analysis (PCA) identified four components overall, but increasing the average velocity of the support surface reduced the modal number of components of the postural coordination pattern from three to two. The analysis of joint motion loadings on the components revealed that organizational properties of the postural pattern also changed as a function of platform dynamics. PC1 (61.6-73.2 %) was accounted for by ankle, knee, and hip motion at the lowest velocity conditions, but as the velocity increased, ankle and hip variance dominated. In PC2 (24.2-20.2 %), the contribution of knee motion significantly increased while that of ankle motion decreased. In PC3 (9.7-5.1 %) neck motion contributed significantly at the highest velocity condition. Collectively, the findings show that the amplitude and frequency of the motion of the surface of support maps redundantly though preferentially to a small set of postural coordination patterns. The higher platform average velocities led to a reduction in the number of dynamical degrees of freedom of the coordination mode and different weightings of joint motion contributions to each component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23392472     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3424-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Thresholds for step initiation induced by support-surface translation: a dynamic center-of-mass model provides much better prediction than a static model.

Authors:  Y C Pai; B E Maki; K Iqbal; W E McIlroy; S D Perry
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Coordination.

Authors:  M T Turvey
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-08

3.  Postural control in young and elderly adults when stance is perturbed: kinematics.

Authors:  N B Alexander; N Shepard; M J Gu; A Schultz
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1992-05

4.  Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.

Authors:  Michael B Pohl; Neil Messenger; John G Buckley
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Functional degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Zong-Ming Li
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  Control and estimation of posture during quiet stance depends on multijoint coordination.

Authors:  Wei-Li Hsu; John P Scholz; Gregor Schöner; John J Jeka; Tim Kiemel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Compensatory postural adaptations during continuous, variable amplitude perturbations reveal generalized rather than sequence-specific learning.

Authors:  K Van Ooteghem; J S Frank; F Allard; J J Buchanan; A R Oates; F B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Postural control in young and elderly adults when stance is perturbed: dynamics.

Authors:  M J Gu; A B Schultz; N T Shepard; N B Alexander
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Postural coordination modes considered as emergent phenomena.

Authors:  B G Bardy; L Marin; T A Stoffregen; R J Bootsma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans.

Authors:  E A Keshner; M H Woollacott; B Debu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Persistence in postural dynamics is dependent on constraints of vision, postural orientation, and the temporal structure of support surface translations.

Authors:  Troy J Rand; Venkata Naga Pradeep Ambati; Mukul Mukherjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Transitions in persistence of postural dynamics depend on the velocity and structure of postural perturbations.

Authors:  Troy J Rand; Mukul Mukherjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Models of Postural Control: Shared Variance in Joint and COM Motions.

Authors:  Melissa C Kilby; Peter C M Molenaar; Karl M Newell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reactions of Standing Bipeds on Moving Platforms to Keep Their Balance May Increase the Amplitude of Oscillations of Platforms Satisfying Hooke's Law.

Authors:  Guillermo H Goldsztein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Asymmetric Influence of Dual-Task Interference on Anticipatory Postural Adjustments in One-Leg Stance.

Authors:  Young Hoon Song; Si Ni Cho; Soo Mi Nam
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.