Literature DB >> 1573188

Postural control in young and elderly adults when stance is perturbed: kinematics.

N B Alexander1, N Shepard, M J Gu, A Schultz.   

Abstract

Increased postural sway and falling are associated with aging and are likely related to problems with postural control in the elderly. We investigated the motions of individual body segments in 24 healthy young adults and 15 healthy elderly adults (mean ages 26 and 72) in response to four tasks: (a) standing with feet flat on an anteriorly accelerating platform (Flat Translation); standing on a narrow beam support that was (b) stationary (Beam Standing) and (c) accelerating anteriorly (Beam Translation); and (d) standing on a rotatable but otherwise stationary springboard (Springboard Standing). An optoelectronic camera system was used to measure rotations of body segments, particularly regarding their maximum excursions, time to first rotation response, direction of initial rotation, and time to first rotation reversal. In general, larger rotation excursions were noted in the elderly compared to the young group, particularly in the Beam Standing and Beam Translation tasks, but the magnitude of rotation difference was small. All rotation magnitudes were well within the available ranges of motion of the body joints. In both excursion magnitudes and directions of initial rotation, the elderly showed greater variability than the young. In the Beam Translation task, the elderly group, compared to the young, tended to rotate their upper body segments more than in the Flat Translation task. These data suggest that healthy elderly adults with no apparent musculoskeletal or neurological impairments have small but consistent differences in postural control kinematics, particularly when more challenging conditions are presented. Moreover, these data provide the basis for biomechanical analyses of joint torques and other dynamic requirements of these responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1573188     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/47.3.m79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  10 in total

1.  Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man.

Authors:  J H J Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger; A L Adkin; B R Bloem
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A direct comparison of local dynamic stability during unperturbed standing and walking.

Authors:  Hyun Gu Kang; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Decreased muscle strength relates to self-reported stooping, crouching, or kneeling difficulty in older adults.

Authors:  Manuel E Hernandez; Allon Goldberg; Neil B Alexander
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-11-26

4.  Age-related changes in open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca; A Burrows; L A Lipsitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Human-centred approaches in slipperiness measurement.

Authors:  R Grönqvist; J Abeysekera; G Gard; S M Hsiang; T B Leamon; D J Newman; K Gielo-Perczak; T E Lockhart; C Y Pai
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Dynamic stabilometric findings in equilibrium disorders of the elderly.

Authors:  S Barozzi; D A Giuliano; G P Giordano; A Cesarani
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Ankle dorsiflexor strength relates to the ability to restore balance during a backward support surface translation.

Authors:  Masahiro Fujimoto; Wei-Li Hsu; Marjorie H Woollacott; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Postural coordination patterns as a function of rhythmical dynamics of the surface of support.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Ko; John H Challis; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  State of science: occupational slips, trips and falls on the same level.

Authors:  Wen-Ruey Chang; Sylvie Leclercq; Thurmon E Lockhart; Roger Haslam
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses.

Authors:  Chiung-Ling Chen; Shu-Zon Lou; Hong-Wen Wu; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Kwok-Tak Yeung; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.