Literature DB >> 23392336

Multi-field-of-view framework for distinguishing tumor grade in ER+ breast cancer from entire histopathology slides.

Ajay Basavanhally1, Shridar Ganesan, Michael Feldman, Natalie Shih, Carolyn Mies, John Tomaszewski, Anant Madabhushi.   

Abstract

Modified Bloom-Richardson (mBR) grading is known to have prognostic value in breast cancer (BCa), yet its use in clinical practice has been limited by intra- and interobserver variability. The development of a computerized system to distinguish mBR grade from entire estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BCa histopathology slides will help clinicians identify grading discrepancies and improve overall confidence in the diagnostic result. In this paper, we isolate salient image features characterizing tumor morphology and texture to differentiate entire hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) stained histopathology slides based on mBR grade. The features are used in conjunction with a novel multi-field-of-view (multi-FOV) classifier--a whole-slide classifier that extracts features from a multitude of FOVs of varying sizes--to identify important image features at different FOV sizes. Image features utilized include those related to the spatial arrangement of cancer nuclei (i.e., nuclear architecture) and the textural patterns within nuclei (i.e., nuclear texture). Using slides from 126 ER+ patients (46 low, 60 intermediate, and 20 high mBR grade), our grading system was able to distinguish low versus high, low versus intermediate, and intermediate versus high grade patients with area under curve values of 0.93, 0.72, and 0.74, respectively. Our results suggest that the multi-FOV classifier is able to 1) successfully discriminate low, medium, and high mBR grade and 2) identify specific image features at different FOV sizes that are important for distinguishing mBR grade in H and E stained ER+ BCa histology slides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23392336      PMCID: PMC5778451          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2245129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  39 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival.

Authors:  Andrew H Beck; Ankur R Sangoi; Samuel Leung; Robert J Marinelli; Torsten O Nielsen; Marc J van de Vijver; Robert B West; Matt van de Rijn; Daphne Koller
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Fractal dimensions of breast lesions on cytology smears.

Authors:  Pranab Dey; Sambit K Mohanty
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.582

3.  A multiresolution diffused expectation-maximization algorithm for medical image segmentation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boccignone; Paolo Napoletano; Vittorio Caggiano; Mario Ferraro
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Comparison of the prognostic value of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson and Nottingham histological grades in a series of 825 cases of breast cancer: major importance of the mitotic count as a component of both grading systems.

Authors:  C Genestie; B Zafrani; B Asselain; A Fourquet; S Rozan; P Validire; A Vincent-Salomon; X Sastre-Garau
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  A high-throughput active contour scheme for segmentation of histopathological imagery.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Andrew Janowczyk; Sharat Chandran; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 6.  Nuclear texture: can it be used as a surrogate endpoint biomarker?

Authors:  B Palcic
Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl       Date:  1994

7.  Predicting drug-target interaction networks based on functional groups and biological features.

Authors:  Zhisong He; Jian Zhang; Xiao-He Shi; Le-Le Hu; Xiangyin Kong; Yu-Dong Cai; Kuo-Chen Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Declining death rates reflect progress against cancer.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward; Michael Thun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Melina B Flanagan; David J Dabbs; Adam M Brufsky; Sushil Beriwal; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Computer-assisted assessment of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical assay in imaged histologic sections using a membrane isolation algorithm and quantitative analysis of positive controls.

Authors:  Bonnie H Hall; Monica Ianosi-Irimie; Parisa Javidian; Wenjin Chen; Shridar Ganesan; David J Foran
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  32 in total

1.  An oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma quantitative histomorphometric-based image classifier of nuclear morphology can risk stratify patients for disease-specific survival.

Authors:  Cheng Lu; James S Lewis; William D Dupont; W Dale Plummer; Andrew Janowczyk; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Nuclear shape and orientation features from H&E images predict survival in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Cheng Lu; David Romo-Bucheli; Xiangxue Wang; Andrew Janowczyk; Shridar Ganesan; Hannah Gilmore; David Rimm; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 3.  Computer-Aided Histopathological Image Analysis Techniques for Automated Nuclear Atypia Scoring of Breast Cancer: a Review.

Authors:  Asha Das; Madhu S Nair; S David Peter
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Convolutional neural network initialized active contour model with adaptive ellipse fitting for nuclear segmentation on breast histopathological images.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Lei Gong; Guanhao Wang; Cheng Lu; Hannah Gilmore; Shaoting Zhang; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-02-08

5.  Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images.

Authors:  Patrick Leo; George Lee; Natalie N C Shih; Robin Elliott; Michael D Feldman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-10-24

6.  Quantitative nuclear histomorphometry predicts oncotype DX risk categories for early stage ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Jon Whitney; German Corredor; Andrew Janowczyk; Shridar Ganesan; Scott Doyle; John Tomaszewski; Michael Feldman; Hannah Gilmore; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Localization of Diagnostically Relevant Regions of Interest in Whole Slide Images: a Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ezgi Mercan; Selim Aksoy; Linda G Shapiro; Donald L Weaver; Tad T Brunyé; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Enhancement of anti-tumor effect of particulate vaccine delivery system by 'bacteriomimetic' CpG functionalization of poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles.

Authors:  Rutika A Kokate; Sanjay I Thamake; Pankaj Chaudhary; Brittney Mott; Sangram Raut; Jamboor K Vishwanatha; Harlan P Jones
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Multiview boosting digital pathology analysis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jin Tae Kwak; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Emerging Themes in Image Informatics and Molecular Analysis for Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Rohit Bhargava; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.