Literature DB >> 23392206

The network of web 2.0 connections among state health departments: new pathways for dissemination.

Jenine K Harris1.   

Abstract

Most state health departments (SHDs) have adopted and are using Facebook and/or Twitter. Among the friends and followers of SHD Facebook and Twitter pages are other SHDs. These connections form networks with the potential to facilitate dissemination of evidence around effective public health practice among health departments nationwide. To better understand the composition and structure of these networks, Facebook and Twitter connections between SHDs were collected and examined. More SHDs were connected to each other on Twitter (n = 37) than on Facebook (n = 24). The Twitter network was denser (dTwitter = 0.06; dFacebook = 0.01) with more clustering (CTwitter = 0.06; CFacebook = 0.01). Larger health departments were more central in the Facebook network, whereas health departments with a longer social media presence were central on Twitter. Health departments on Twitter were also more likely to be following other health departments in the same geographic region, whereas the same was not true on Facebook. California and Florida were central in the Facebook network, whereas Minnesota, Missouri, Louisiana, and Rhode Island were central on Twitter. Overall, the Twitter network demonstrated greater potential to disseminate information quickly to a larger group of SHDs. More information is needed on the feasibility and effectiveness of using Web 2.0 for dissemination and other public health activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23392206     DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318268ae36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  5 in total

1.  Social media adoption in local health departments nationwide.

Authors:  Jenine K Harris; Nancy L Mueller; Doneisha Snider
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Understanding administrative evidence-based practices: findings from a survey of local health department leaders.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Rodrigo S Reis; Peg Allen; Kathleen Duggan; Robert Fields; Katherine A Stamatakis; Paul C Erwin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Twitter Research Synthesis for Health Promotion: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Syed Hamad Hassan Shah; Saleha Noor; Atif Saleem Butt; Habiba Halepoto
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  The Relationship of Policymaking and Networking Characteristics among Leaders of Large Urban Health Departments.

Authors:  Jonathon P Leider; Brian C Castrucci; Jenine K Harris; Shelley Hearne
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Analysis of the purpose of state health departments' tweets: information sharing, engagement, and action.

Authors:  Rosemary Thackeray; Brad L Neiger; Scott H Burton; Callie R Thackeray
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.