Gail N Groth1, Dorothy Farrar-Edwards. 1. Department of Orthopedics & Hands, UW Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA. groth.gail@gmail.com
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods, cross-sectional. INTRODUCTION: Nearly 30% of Certified Hand Therapists rarely or never use research findings when treating carpal tunnel syndrome. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To identify groups of CHTs with common research utilization patterns. METHODS: National randomized mail survey of 600 CHTs (n = 308, RR = 55%). Latent class and thematic analysis of eight questions assessing research use and beliefs. RESULTS: Four groups of CHT research users were identified: Analytic (n = 135, 45%); Skeptic (n = 65, 22%); Pragmatic (n = 53, 18%); and Traditional (n = 46, 15%). Highest research use was reported among Analytics and Pragmatics although Skeptics willingly relied on research evidence when it contradicted other sources of knowledge. Age, not experience or population density, was a significant covariate of group membership. CONCLUSIONS: Empowering CHTs to use research findings by increased understanding of their group membership, and understanding others' groups, may increase progress toward evidence-based practice.
STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods, cross-sectional. INTRODUCTION: Nearly 30% of Certified Hand Therapists rarely or never use research findings when treating carpal tunnel syndrome. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To identify groups of CHTs with common research utilization patterns. METHODS: National randomized mail survey of 600 CHTs (n = 308, RR = 55%). Latent class and thematic analysis of eight questions assessing research use and beliefs. RESULTS: Four groups of CHT research users were identified: Analytic (n = 135, 45%); Skeptic (n = 65, 22%); Pragmatic (n = 53, 18%); and Traditional (n = 46, 15%). Highest research use was reported among Analytics and Pragmatics although Skeptics willingly relied on research evidence when it contradicted other sources of knowledge. Age, not experience or population density, was a significant covariate of group membership. CONCLUSIONS: Empowering CHTs to use research findings by increased understanding of their group membership, and understanding others' groups, may increase progress toward evidence-based practice.
Authors: Karen Ann V Cameron; Scott Ballantyne; Autumnrose Kulbitsky; Michelle Margolis-Gal; Timothy Daugherty; Ferol Ludwig Journal: Occup Ther Int Date: 2005 Impact factor: 1.448