Literature DB >> 23391692

Computational lymphatic node models in pediatric and adult hybrid phantoms for radiation dosimetry.

Choonsik Lee1, Stephanie Lamart, Brian E Moroz.   

Abstract

We developed models of lymphatic nodes for six pediatric and two adult hybrid computational phantoms to calculate the lymphatic node dose estimates from external and internal radiation exposures. We derived the number of lymphatic nodes from the recommendations in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publications 23 and 89 at 16 cluster locations for the lymphatic nodes: extrathoracic, cervical, thoracic (upper and lower), breast (left and right), mesentery (left and right), axillary (left and right), cubital (left and right), inguinal (left and right) and popliteal (left and right), for different ages (newborn, 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-year-old and adult). We modeled each lymphatic node within the voxel format of the hybrid phantoms by assuming that all nodes have identical size derived from published data except narrow cluster sites. The lymph nodes were generated by the following algorithm: (1) selection of the lymph node site among the 16 cluster sites; (2) random sampling of the location of the lymph node within a spherical space centered at the chosen cluster site; (3) creation of the sphere or ovoid of tissue representing the node based on lymphatic node characteristics defined in ICRP Publications 23 and 89. We created lymph nodes until the pre-defined number of lymphatic nodes at the selected cluster site was reached. This algorithm was applied to pediatric (newborn, 1-, 5-and 10-year-old male, and 15-year-old males) and adult male and female ICRP-compliant hybrid phantoms after voxelization. To assess the performance of our models for internal dosimetry, we calculated dose conversion coefficients, called S values, for selected organs and tissues with Iodine-131 distributed in six lymphatic node cluster sites using MCNPX2.6, a well validated Monte Carlo radiation transport code. Our analysis of the calculations indicates that the S values were significantly affected by the location of the lymph node clusters and that the values increased for smaller phantoms due to the shorter inter-organ distances compared to the bigger phantoms. By testing sensitivity of S values to random sampling and voxel resolution, we confirmed that the lymph node model is reasonably stable and consistent for different random samplings and voxel resolutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23391692      PMCID: PMC3878984          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/5/N59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  MAX06 and FAX06: update of two adult human phantoms for radiation protection dosimetry.

Authors:  R Kramer; H J Khoury; J W Vieira; V J M Lima
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Revisions to the ORNL series of adult and pediatric computational phantoms for use with the MIRD schema.

Authors:  Eun Young Han; Wesley E Bolch; Keith F Eckerman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  The number and size of normal mediastinal lymph nodes: a postmortem study.

Authors:  K Kiyono; S Sone; F Sakai; Y Imai; T Watanabe; I Izuno; M Oguchi; T Kawai; H Shigematsu; M Watanabe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Normal mediastinal lymph nodes: number and size according to American Thoracic Society mapping.

Authors:  G M Glazer; B H Gross; L E Quint; I R Francis; F L Bookstein; M B Orringer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. A report of a Task Group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1994

6.  Normal mediastinal lymph node size and number: CT and anatomic study.

Authors:  G P Genereux; J L Howie
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Comparison of internal dosimetry factors for three classes of adult computational phantoms with emphasis on I-131 in the thyroid.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Andre Bouville; Steven L Simon; Keith F Eckerman; Dunstana Melo; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Computational anthropomorphic models of the human anatomy: the path to realistic Monte Carlo modeling in radiological sciences.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Xie George Xu
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. A report of age- and gender-related differences in the anatomical and physiological characteristics of reference individuals. ICRP Publication 89.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2002

10.  Hybrid computational phantoms of the male and female newborn patient: NURBS-based whole-body models.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Daniel Lodwick; Deanna Hasenauer; Jonathan L Williams; Choonik Lee; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the use of surrogate tissues for calculating radiation dose to lymphatic nodes from external photon beams.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Brian E Moroz; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  A NOVEL METHOD TO ESTIMATE LYMPHOCYTE DOSE AND APPLICATION TO PEDIATRIC AND YOUNG ADULT CT PATIENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Lindsay M Morton; Amy Berrington de González
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Suggested reference values for regional blood volumes in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Michael B Wayson; Richard W Leggett; Derek W Jokisch; Choonsik Lee; Bryan C Schwarz; William J Godwin; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Dosimetric Impact of a New Computational Voxel Phantom Series for the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors: Children and Adults.

Authors:  Keith Griffin; Colin Paulbeck; Wesley Bolch; Harry Cullings; Stephen Egbert; Sachiyo Funamoto; Tatsuhiko Sato; Akira Endo; Nolan Hertel; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Contribution of Imaging to Organs at Risk Dose during Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Milovan Savanović; François Gardavaud; Dražan Jaroš; Bénédicte Lonkuta; Matthias Barral; François Henri Cornelis; Jean-Noël Foulquier
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Lymphoma and multiple myeloma in cohorts of persons exposed to ionising radiation at a young age.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; Lydia B Zablotska; David Borrego; Keith T Griffin; Rodrigue S Allodji; Florent de Vathaire; Choonsik Lee; Alina V Brenner; Jeremy S Miller; David Campbell; Siegal Sadetzki; Michele M Doody; Erik Holmberg; Marie Lundell; Michael Jacob Adams; Benjamin French; Martha S Linet; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 11.528

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.