Literature DB >> 23389327

Voice characteristics of acromegaly.

Kadriye Aydin1, Didem Turkyilmaz, Burak Ozturk, Selcuk Dagdelen, Burce Ozgen, Faruk Unal, Tomris Erbas.   

Abstract

Acromegaly's effect on voice is still indefinite. We aimed to define acoustic characteristics of patients with acromegaly. Cross-sectional case-control study was designed. Thirty-seven patients with acromegaly and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included. Fundamental frequency (F0) and measurements related to frequency, amplitude, noise and tremor of the obtained voice sample were analyzed using Multi-Dimensional Voice Program. Absolute jitter (Jita) and jitter percent (Jitt), shimmer in decibel and shimmer percent, noise to harmonic ratio and soft phonation index, fundamental frequency tremor frequency and frequency tremor intensity index represented the parameters related to frequency, amplitude, noise and tremor of the voice sample, respectively. Patients with acromegaly, especially the uncontrolled patients, exhibited significant differences in frequency perturbation measurements. Jitt of all patients and Jita of uncontrolled patients were significantly higher than that of control group (p = 0.044 and p = 0.043, respectively). Jitter which is a measure of frequency perturbation can be assumed as an indicator of hoarse and deepened voice. Jita of all patients and Jitt of uncontrolled patients were elevated, but not reaching a statistical significance. Controlled and active patients had similar analysis of acoustic parameters. In the correlation analysis, shimmer and IGF-1 (insulin like growth factor 1) was found to be positively correlated in all patients with acromegaly and in female patients. When the p value is adjusted according to Bonferroni correction regarding the use of ten parameters for acoustic analysis (so adjusted p is <0.005), all the statistically significant findings become insignificant. Considering the parameters test different properties of voice, it is reasonable to pay attention to the findings. Patients with acromegaly have increased frequency perturbations measures, but this increase is non-significant according to Bonferroni correction. This may be perceptually sensed as hoarse voice. Amplitude perturbations within the voice of the patients with acromegaly are positively correlated with IGF-1 levels, this correlation is also non-significant according to Bonferroni correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23389327     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2369-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  12 in total

1.  Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients.

Authors:  Haldun Oguz; Erkan Tarhan; Murat Korkmaz; Ugur Yilmaz; Mustafa A Safak; Munir Demirci; Levent N Ozluoglu
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 2.  Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again?

Authors:  Meike Brockmann-Bauser; Michael J Drinnan
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  The extrathoracic airway in acromegaly.

Authors:  D J Morewood; P E Belchetz; C C Evans; G H Whitehouse
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness.

Authors:  E Yumoto; W J Gould; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Selected speech and fundamental frequency characteristics of patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  B Weinberg; R Dexter; Y Horii
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1975-05

6.  Analysis of voice in patients with untreated active acromegaly.

Authors:  F Bogazzi; A Nacci; A Campomori; R La Vela; G Rossi; M Lombardi; B Fattori; L Bartalena; F Ursino; E Martino
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Changing patterns in diagnosis and therapy of acromegaly over two decades.

Authors:  Lisa Nachtigall; Adriano Delgado; Brooke Swearingen; Hang Lee; Rahfa Zerikly; Anne Klibanski
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Voice changes in acromegaly.

Authors:  R G Williams; S H Richards; R G Mills; R Eccles
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Upper airflow obstruction and pulmonary function in acromegaly: relationship to disease activity.

Authors:  B Trotman-Dickenson; A P Weetman; J M Hughes
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1991-06

10.  Acromegaly presented as a cause of laryngeal dyspnea.

Authors:  S Saussez; V Mahillon; G Chantrain; M P Thill; T Lequeux
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.863

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Selective screening of patients with associated somatic diseases as a method of early detection of acromegaly].

Authors:  M B Antsiferov; V S Pronin; T M Alekseeva; O A Ionova; E Y Martynova; Yu E Poteshkin; N A Chubrova; K Y Zherebchikova
Journal:  Probl Endokrinol (Mosk)       Date:  2021-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.