Literature DB >> 23389072

A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Virinder Kumar Bansal1, Mahesh C Misra, Divya Babu, Jonathan Victor, Subodh Kumar, Rajesh Sagar, S Rajeshwari, Asuri Krishna, Vimi Rewari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data are insufficient to compare transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. There is very scant data comparing the two techniques in terms of long-term outcomes, which include chronic groin pain, quality of life, and time to return to normal activity. This prospective, randomized, controlled trial compared TEP versus TAPP techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in terms of these long-term outcomes.
METHODS: This study was conducted from May 1, 2007 to March 30, 2012. Patients with uncomplicated groin hernia were randomized to transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques. A total of 160 patients were randomized to group I (TEP) and 154 patients to group II (TAPP). Pain was assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) preoperatively and postoperatively at 24 h, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Quality of life was assessed with Short Form-36 version 2 (SF 36v2) preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months follow-up.
RESULTS: Demographic, clinical profiles, intraoperative, and early postoperative parameters were well matched. There was significantly higher acute pain following TAPP repair; however, the chronic groin pain was comparable in both TEP and TAPP. Preoperative pain and immediate postoperative pain had significant correlation with chronic groin pain. Significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative quality of life was seen in both TEP and TAPP repairs, but there was no difference between TEP and TAPP in postoperative period. Time to return to normal activity also was similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The TEP and TAPP techniques of laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia have comparable long-term outcomes in terms of incidence of chronic groin pain, quality of life, and resumption of normal activities. Chronic groin pain had a significant correlation with preoperative pain and early postoperative pain. However, TAPP was associated with significantly higher incidence of early postoperative pain, longer operative time, and cord edema, whereas TEP was associated with a significant higher incidence of seroma formation. The cost was comparable between the two.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23389072     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2797-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

Review 1.  Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  E Aasvang; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Robert J Fitzgibbons; Varun Puri
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)].

Authors:  R Bittner; M E Arregui; T Bisgaard; M Dudai; G S Ferzli; R J Fitzgibbons; R H Fortelny; U Klinge; F Kockerling; E Kuhry; J Kukleta; D Lomanto; M C Misra; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; W Reinpold; J Rosenberg; S Sauerland; C Schug-Pass; K Singh; M Timoney; D Weyhe; P Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David Wright; Caron Paterson; Neil Scott; Alan Hair; Patrick J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.

Authors:  K McCormack; B Wake; J Perez; C Fraser; J Cook; E McIntosh; L Vale; A Grant
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient.

Authors:  J Cunningham; W J Temple; P Mitchell; J A Nixon; R M Preshaw; N A Hagen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair?

Authors:  R V Cohen; G Alvarez; S Roll; M E Garcia; N Kawahara; C A Schiavon; T D Schaffa; P R Pereira; N F Margarido; A J Rodrigues
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1998-08

9.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Amudha S Poobalan; Julie Bruce; W Cairns S Smith; Peter M King; Zygmunt H Krukowski; W Alastair Chambers
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

View more
  54 in total

1.  Comparison of peritoneal closure versus non-closure in laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with coated mesh.

Authors:  Erica D Kane; Marc Leduc; Kathryn Schlosser; Nicole Parentela; Donna Wilson; John R Romanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Importance and utility of laparoscopic inguinal exploration in cases with chronic groin pain: Comment on: Laparoscopic diagnosis and management of a novel inguinopelvic hernia. Modeste K, Novitsky W. Hernia 2013 Jun 17: 419-422, doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0910-9.

Authors:  M Bellver; F Rotellar; P M Ortega; G Zozaya
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Videoscopic total extraperitoneal approach to an adult patient with undescended testicle accompanied by a contra-lateral inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Selim Birol; Ahmet Bekin; Turgay Öztürkmen; Kamil Alpay
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-03-01

Review 4.  Convalescence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Mette Astrup Tolver; Jacob Rosenberg; Thue Bisgaard
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair in community hospital settings: a general surgeon's last 10 years experience.

Authors:  F Agresta; M Torchiaro; C Tordin
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  Totally extra-peritoneal repair versus trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair for the laparoscopic surgical management of sportsman's hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron Kler; Nisa Sekhon; George A Antoniou; Thomas Satyadas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M Sakon; Y Sekino; M Okada; H Seki; Y Munakata
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  Current status of single-port versus multi-port approach in laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Perivoliotis; G Tzovaras; C Sarakatsianou; I Baloyiannis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  [Diagnostics and therapy of chronic pain following hernia operation].

Authors:  D Berger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Manjunath Siddaiah-Subramanya; Darius Ashrafi; Breda Memon; Muhammed Ashraf Memon
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.