Literature DB >> 23388213

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and a QRS complex <120 milliseconds: the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (LESSER-EARTH) trial.

Bernard Thibault1, François Harel, Anique Ducharme, Michel White, Kenneth A Ellenbogen, Nancy Frasure-Smith, Denis Roy, François Philippon, Paul Dorian, Mario Talajic, Marc Dubuc, Peter G Guerra, Laurent Macle, Léna Rivard, Jason Andrade, Paul Khairy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy are well established in selected patients with heart failure and a prolonged QRS duration, salutary effects in patients with narrow QRS complexes remain to be demonstrated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (LESSER-EARTH) trial is a randomized, double-blind, 12-center study that was designed to compare the effects of active and inactive cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and a QRS duration <120 milliseconds. The trial was interrupted prematurely by the Data Safety and Monitoring Board because of futility and safety concerns after 85 patients were randomized. Changes in exercise duration after 12 months were no different in patients with and without active cardiac resynchronization therapy (-0.7 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI), -2.9 to 1.5] versus 0.8 minutes [95% CI, -1.2 to 2.9]; P=0.31]. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in left ventricular end-systolic volumes (-6.4 mL [95% CI, -18.8 to 5.9] versus 3.1 mL [95% CI, -9.2 to 15.5]; P=0.28) and ejection fraction (3.3% [95% CI, 0.7-6.0] versus 2.1% [95% CI, -0.5 to 4.8]; P=0.52). Moreover, cardiac resynchronization therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the 6-minute walk distance (-11.3 m [95% CI, -31.7 to 9.7] versus 25.3 m [95% CI, 6.1-44.5]; P=0.01), an increase in QRS duration (40.2 milliseconds [95% CI, 34.2-46.2] versus 3.4 milliseconds [95% CI, 0.6-6.2]; P<0.0001), and a nonsignificant trend toward an increase in heart failure-related hospitalizations (15 hospitalizations in 5 patients versus 4 hospitalizations in 4 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, symptoms of heart failure, and a QRS duration <120 milliseconds, cardiac resynchronization therapy did not improve clinical outcomes or left ventricular remodeling and was associated with potential harm. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00900549.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23388213     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  27 in total

1.  Mechanical Dyssynchrony: A Risk Factor but not a Target.

Authors:  Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on patients with heart failure and narrow QRS complexes: a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Guanggong Wang; Zonglei Zhao; Shichao Zhao; Shoukun Ding; Shuxin Shen; Lixia Wang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Novel Pacing Strategies for Heart Failure Management.

Authors:  Jordan S Leyton-Mange; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  Should His Bundle Pacing Be Preferred over Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Following Atrioventricular Junction Ablation?

Authors:  Zak Loring; Albert Y Sun
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 5.  Recent advances in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Satish Chandraprakasam; Gina G Mentzer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 6.  Overview of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure management.

Authors:  Pow-Li Chia; David Foo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: The Optimal QRS Duration Revisited.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 8.  Device Management in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Brett G Angel; Heath Saltzman; Luke S Kusmirek
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Neal A Chatterjee; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-06

10.  Device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction-cardiac resynchronization therapy and more.

Authors:  D Duncker; C Veltmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.