Literature DB >> 23386656

Consider the source: persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility.

Colin Tucker Smith1, Jan De Houwer, Brian A Nosek.   

Abstract

The long history of persuasion research shows how to change explicit, self-reported evaluations through direct appeals. At the same time, research on how to change implicit evaluations has focused almost entirely on techniques of retraining existing evaluations or manipulating contexts. In five studies, we examined whether direct appeals can change implicit evaluations in the same way as they do explicit evaluations. In five studies, both explicit and implicit evaluations showed greater evidence of persuasion following information presented by a highly credible source than a source low in credibility. Whereas cognitive load did not alter the effect of source credibility on explicit evaluations, source credibility had an effect on the persuasion of implicit evaluations only when participants were encouraged and able to consider information about the source. Our findings reveal the relevance of persuasion research for changing implicit evaluations and provide new ideas about the processes underlying both types of evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23386656     DOI: 10.1177/0146167212472374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  7 in total

1.  Believability of evidence matters for correcting social impressions.

Authors:  Jeremy Cone; Kathryn Flaharty; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures.

Authors:  Patrick S Forscher; Calvin K Lai; Jordan R Axt; Charles R Ebersole; Michelle Herman; Patricia G Devine; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-06-13

3.  Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas C Mann; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23

4.  The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity.

Authors:  Suzanne Hoogeveen; Julia M Haaf; Joseph A Bulbulia; Robert M Ross; Ryan McKay; Sacha Altay; Theiss Bendixen; Renatas Berniūnas; Arik Cheshin; Claudio Gentili; Raluca Georgescu; Will M Gervais; Kristin Hagel; Christopher Kavanagh; Neil Levy; Alejandra Neely; Lin Qiu; André Rabelo; Jonathan E Ramsay; Bastiaan T Rutjens; Hugh Turpin; Filip Uzarevic; Robin Wuyts; Dimitris Xygalatas; Michiel van Elk
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-02-07

5.  Results of a Community Randomized Study of a Faith-Based Education Program to Improve Clinical Trial Participation among African Americans.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Jay T Schamel; Kelli A O'Connell; Laura A Randall; Sahithi Boggavarapu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Hooked on a feeling: affective anti-smoking messages are more effective than cognitive messages at changing implicit evaluations of smoking.

Authors:  Colin Tucker Smith; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-06

7.  Graphic cigarette pack warnings do not produce more negative implicit evaluations of smoking compared to text-only warnings.

Authors:  Pieter Van Dessel; Colin Tucker Smith; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.