Literature DB >> 23386560

Interactions of odorants with olfactory receptors and other preprocessing mechanisms: how complex and difficult to predict?

Jean-Pierre Rospars1.   

Abstract

In this issue of Chemical Senses, Münch et al. present a thorough analysis of how mixtures of odorants interact with olfactory receptors (ORs) borne by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs). Using fruit fly ORNs expressing the receptor OR22a, they provide a clear example of mixture interaction and confirm that the response of an ORN to a binary mixture can be sometimes predicted quantitatively knowing the ORN responses to its components as shown previously in rat ORNs. The prediction is based on a nonlinear model that assumes a classical 2-step activation of the OR and competition of the 2 odorants in the mixture for the same binding site. Can this success be generalized to all odorant-receptor pairs? This would be an encouraging perspective, especially for the fragrance and flavor industries, as it would permit the prediction of all mixtures. To address this question, I outline its conceptual framework and discuss the variety of mixture interactions found so far. In accordance with the effects described in the study of other receptors, several kinds of mixture interactions have been found that are not easily predictable. The relative importance of the predictable and less predictable effects thus appears as a major issue for future developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23386560     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjt004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  7 in total

1.  Characterizing olfactory binary mixture interactions in Fischer 344 rats using behavioral reaction times.

Authors:  Wendy M Yoder; Leslie Gaynor; Ethan Windham; Michelle Lyman; Olivia Munizza; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon; David W Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Understanding responses to chemical mixtures: looking forward from the past.

Authors:  Charles D Derby; Timothy S McClintock; John Caprio
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Responsiveness to Sugar Solutions in the Moth Agrotis ipsilon: Parameters Affecting Proboscis Extension.

Authors:  Camille Hostachy; Philippe Couzi; Melissa Hanafi-Portier; Guillaume Portemer; Alexandre Halleguen; Meena Murmu; Nina Deisig; Matthieu Dacher
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  A closer look at sex pheromone autodetection in the Oriental fruit moth.

Authors:  Alicia Pérez-Aparicio; Byrappa Ammagarahalli; César Gemeno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Odorant receptors of Drosophila are sensitive to the molecular volume of odorants.

Authors:  Majid Saberi; Hamed Seyed-Allaei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Take time: odor coding capacity across sensory neurons increases over time in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel Münch; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  A physicochemical model of odor sampling.

Authors:  Mitchell E Gronowitz; Adam Liu; Qiang Qiu; C Ron Yu; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.