Literature DB >> 23386086

Comparison between two surgical techniques for prenatal correction of meningomyelocele in sheep.

Silvia Rejane Fontoura Herrera1, Ricardo José de Almeida Leme, Paulo Roberto Valente, Elia Garcia Caldini, Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva, Denise Araujo Lapa Pedreira.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the classical neurosurgical technique with a new simplified technique for prenatal repair of a myelomeningocele-like defect in sheep.
METHODS: A myelomeningocele-like defect (laminectomy and dural excision) was created in the lumbar region on day 90 of gestation in 9 pregnant sheep. Correction technique was randomized. In Group 1 the defect was corrected using the classic neurosurgical technique of three-layer suture (dura mater, muscle and skin closure) performed by a neurosurgeon. In Group 2, a fetal medicine specialist used a biosynthetic cellulose patch to protect the spinal cord and only the skin was sutured above it. Near term (day 132 of gestation) fetuses were sacrificed for pathological analysis.
RESULTS: There were two miscarriages and one maternal death. In total, six cases were available for pathological analysis, three in each group. In Group 1, there were adherence of the spinal cord to the scar (meningo-neural adhesion) and spinal cord architecture loss with posterior funiculus destruction and no visualization of grey matter. In Group 2, we observed in all cases formation of a neo-dura mater, separating the nervous tissue from adjacent muscles, and preserving the posterior funiculus and grey matter.
CONCLUSION: The new simplified technique was better than the classic neurosurgical technique. It preserved the nervous tissue and prevented the adherence of the spinal cord to the scar. This suggests the current technique used for the correction of spina bifida in humans may need to be reassessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23386086     DOI: 10.1590/s1679-45082012000400011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1679-4508


  5 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal surgery for spina bifida: a therapeutic dilemma. Proceedings of the SHINE conference, Belfast.

Authors:  Mano Shanmuganathan; Deborah A Sival; Kelly-Ann Eastwood; Katie Morris; Jacqueline Cartmill; Axel Heep; Janusz Bohosiewicz; Agnieszka Pastuszka; Alyson Hunter; Amanda Ali; Roy McConnell; Darach Crimmins; Fergal Malone; Carolyn Bailie; Jan Deprest; Cathy McKillop; Zarko Alfirevic; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Stephen Ong
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Heritable spina bifida in sheep: A potential model for fetal repair of myelomeningocele.

Authors:  John W Steele; Sharon Bayliss; John Bayliss; Ying Linda Lin; Bogdan J Wlodarczyk; Robert M Cabrera; Yohannes G Asfaw; Thomas J Cummings; Richard H Finnell; Timothy M George
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Percutaneous fetoscopic spina bifida repair: effect on ambulation and need for postnatal cerebrospinal fluid diversion and bladder catheterization.

Authors:  D A Lapa; R H Chmait; Y Gielchinsky; M Yamamoto; N Persico; M Santorum; M M Gil; L Trigo; R A Quintero; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 8.678

Review 4.  Fetoscopy for meningomyelocele repair: past, present and future.

Authors:  Nicole Silva Bevilacqua; Denise Araujo Lapa Pedreira
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

5.  Fetoscopic repair of spina bifida: safer and better?

Authors:  D A L Pedreira; E A Reece; R H Chmait; E V Kontopoulos; R A Quintero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.299

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.