OBJECTIVE: Different methods for contouring target volumes are currently in use in the UK when irradiating glioblastomas post operatively. Both one- and two-phase techniques are offered at different centres. 90% of relapses are recognised to occur locally when using radiotherapy alone. The objective of this evaluation was to determine the pattern of relapse following concomitant radiotherapy with temozolomide (RT-TMZ). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients receiving RT-TMZ between 2006 and 2010 was performed. Outcome data including survival were calculated from the start of radiotherapy. Analysis of available serial cross-sectional imaging was performed from diagnosis to first relapse. The site of first relapse was defined by the relationship to primary disease. Central relapse was defined as progression of the primary enhancing mass or the appearance of a new enhancing nodule within 2 cm. RESULTS: 105 patients were identified as receiving RT-TMZ. 34 patients were not eligible for relapse analysis owing to either lack of progression or unsuitable imaging. Patterns of first relapse were as follows: 55 (77%) patients relapsed centrally within 2 cm of the original gadolinium-enhanced mass on MRI, 13 (18%) patients relapsed >4 cm from the original enhancement and 3 (4%) relapsed within the contralateral hemisphere. CONCLUSION: Central relapse remains the predominant pattern of failure following RT-TMZ. Single-phase conformal radiotherapy using a 2-cm margin from the original contrast-enhanced mass is appropriate for the majority of these patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Central relapse remains the predominant pattern of failure following chemoradiotherapy for glioblastomas.
OBJECTIVE: Different methods for contouring target volumes are currently in use in the UK when irradiating glioblastomas post operatively. Both one- and two-phase techniques are offered at different centres. 90% of relapses are recognised to occur locally when using radiotherapy alone. The objective of this evaluation was to determine the pattern of relapse following concomitant radiotherapy with temozolomide (RT-TMZ). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients receiving RT-TMZ between 2006 and 2010 was performed. Outcome data including survival were calculated from the start of radiotherapy. Analysis of available serial cross-sectional imaging was performed from diagnosis to first relapse. The site of first relapse was defined by the relationship to primary disease. Central relapse was defined as progression of the primary enhancing mass or the appearance of a new enhancing nodule within 2 cm. RESULTS: 105 patients were identified as receiving RT-TMZ. 34 patients were not eligible for relapse analysis owing to either lack of progression or unsuitable imaging. Patterns of first relapse were as follows: 55 (77%) patients relapsed centrally within 2 cm of the original gadolinium-enhanced mass on MRI, 13 (18%) patients relapsed >4 cm from the original enhancement and 3 (4%) relapsed within the contralateral hemisphere. CONCLUSION: Central relapse remains the predominant pattern of failure following RT-TMZ. Single-phase conformal radiotherapy using a 2-cm margin from the original contrast-enhanced mass is appropriate for the majority of these patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Central relapse remains the predominant pattern of failure following chemoradiotherapy for glioblastomas.
Authors: Eric L Chang; Serap Akyurek; Tedde Avalos; Neal Rebueno; Chris Spicer; John Garcia; Robin Famiglietti; Pamela K Allen; K S Clifford Chao; Anita Mahajan; Shiao Y Woo; Moshe H Maor Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M M Fitzek; A F Thornton; J D Rabinov; M H Lev; F S Pardo; J E Munzenrider; P Okunieff; M Bussière; I Braun; F H Hochberg; E T Hedley-Whyte; N J Liebsch; G R Harsh Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S W Lee; B A Fraass; L H Marsh; K Herbort; S S Gebarski; M K Martel; E H Radany; A S Lichter; H M Sandler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: L E Gaspar; B J Fisher; D R Macdonald; D V LeBer; E C Halperin; S C Schold; J G Cairncross Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1992 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hai Yan; D Williams Parsons; Genglin Jin; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Weishi Yuan; Ivan Kos; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Siân Jones; Gregory J Riggins; Henry Friedman; Allan Friedman; David Reardon; James Herndon; Kenneth W Kinzler; Victor E Velculescu; Bert Vogelstein; Darell D Bigner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-19 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Sébastien Perreault; Robert M Lober; Anne-Sophie Carret; Guohua Zhang; Linda Hershon; Jean-Claude Décarie; Hannes Vogel; Kristen W Yeom; Paul G Fisher; Sonia Partap Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Collin T Inglut; Brandon Gaitan; Daniel Najafali; Irati Abad Lopez; Nina P Connolly; Seppo Orsila; Robert Perttilä; Graeme F Woodworth; Yu Chen; Huang-Chiao Huang Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2019-10-13 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: James S Cordova; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Zhongxing Liang; Saumya S Gurbani; Lee A D Cooper; Chad A Holder; Jeffrey J Olson; Brad Kairdolf; Eduard Schreibmann; Stewart G Neill; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis; Hyunsuk Shim Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 12.300