Literature DB >> 23385986

rhBMP-2 with a demineralized bone matrix scaffold versus autologous iliac crest bone graft for alveolar cleft reconstruction.

Cameron S Francis1, Sheila S Nazarian Mobin, Michael A Lypka, Elizabeth Rommer, Stephen Yen, Mark M Urata, Jeffrey A Hammoudeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Secondary alveolar cleft reconstruction using autologous iliac crest bone graft is currently the standard treatment for alveolar clefts. Although effective, harvesting autologous bone may result in considerable donor-site morbidity, most commonly pain and the potential for long-term sensory disturbances. In an effort to decrease patient morbidity, a novel technique using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 encased in a demineralized bone matrix scaffold was developed as an alternative to autografting for secondary alveolar cleft reconstruction.
METHODS: A chart review was conducted for the 55 patients who underwent secondary alveolar cleft reconstruction over a 2-year period with a mean follow-up of 21 months. Of these, 36 patients received rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix scaffold (including 10 patients with previously failed repairs using iliac crest bone grafting) and 19 patients underwent iliac crest bone grafting. Postoperatively, bone stock was evaluated using occlusal radiographs rated according to the Bergland and Chelsea scales.
RESULTS: Alveolar clefts repaired using rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix scaffold were 97.2 percent successful compared with 84.2 percent with iliac crest bone grafting. Radiographically, initial repairs with rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix scaffold were superior to iliac crest bone grafting according to both Bergland and Chelsea scales, and significantly more patients in the rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix scaffold group had coronal bridging. The postoperative intraoral infection rate following iliac crest bone grafting was significantly greater than for rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix scaffold. The cost of rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix scaffold products was offset by cost savings associated with a reduction in operative time averaging 102 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: rhBMP-2 encased in a demineralized bone matrix scaffold appears to be a viable alternative for secondary alveolar cleft repair. Patients are spared donor-site morbidity and achieve excellent results, decreasing operative time, and increasing operating room use. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23385986     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865dfb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  22 in total

1.  Regeneration of a Pediatric Alveolar Cleft Model Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds and Osteogenic Agents: Comparison of Dipyridamole and rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Michael I Greenberg; Dean L Cuadrado; Audrey M Guarino; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Lukasz Witek; Roberto L Flores; Nick Tovar; Andrea Torroni; Paulo G Coelho; F Kurtis Kasper; Mark Wong; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Demineralized bone matrix for alveolar cleft management.

Authors:  Jose Rolando Prada Madrid; Viviana Gomez; Bibiana Mendoza
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-05-21

4.  Transforming the Degradation Rate of β-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Replacement Using 3-Dimensional Printing.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Maxime M Wang; Lukasz Witek; Nick Tovar; Bruce N Cronstein; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 5.  Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Greeshma Thrivikraman; Avathamsa Athirasala; Chelsea Twohig; Sunil Kumar Boda; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

Review 6.  Bone regeneration with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jannice de Queiroz Fernandes; Valthierre Nunes de Lima; João Paulo Bonardi; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Sormani Bento Fernandes Queiroz
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-12-16

7.  Repurposing Human Osteoarthritic Cartilage as a Bone Graft Substitute in an Athymic Rat Posterolateral Spinal Fusion Model.

Authors:  Alan B C Dang; Helena Hong; Katie Lee; Tammy Luan; Sanjay Reddy; Alfred C Kuo
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21

8.  Three-Dimensional Changes of Maxilla after Secondary Alveolar Cleft Repair: Differences Between rhBMP-2 and Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Grafting.

Authors:  Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral; Rafael Denadai; Nivaldo Alonso
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10

9.  Allogeneic Bone Application in Association with Platelet-Rich Plasma for Alveolar Bone Grafting of Cleft Palate Defects.

Authors:  Cimara Fortes Ferreira; João Luiz Carlini; Ricardo de Souza Magini; José Nazareno Gil; André Luis Zétola
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 10.  Innovative Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics in Cleft Palate Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jeremie D Oliver; Shihai Jia; Leslie R Halpern; Emily M Graham; Emma C Turner; John S Colombo; David W Grainger; Rena N D'Souza
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 7.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.