Literature DB >> 23385301

Short and midterm results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty according to the preoperative etiology.

Mathias Wellmann1, Melena Struck, Marc Frederic Pastor, Andre Gettmann, Henning Windhagen, Tomas Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has shown promising results for cuff tear arthropathy but the indication has been extended to fracture sequelae and revision shoulder arthroplasty with different preconditions. Further, the clinical relevance of inferior scapular notching for different etiologies is uncertain. Our hypothesis was that preoperative etiology as well as the occurrence of scapular notching would significantly influence the clinical outcome.
METHODS: We reviewed 76 reverse shoulder arthroplasties for cuff tear arthropathy (45 patients), fracture sequelae (10 patients) and revision arthroplasty (21 patients) retrospectively. The follow-up consisted of 71 patients and the mean follow-up period was 23 months (±14 months). All patients were evaluated postoperatively using the Constant score adjusted for age and gender and the simple shoulder test. A radiological investigation was performed preoperatively and at the time of the final follow-up including the evaluation of scapular notching according to Sirveaux. For further evaluation of scapular notching, patients were separated into three groups according to the inferior glenosphere overlap: negative or no inferior overlap -6-0 mm), mild overlap (1-4 mm) and pronounced overlap (5-9 mm).
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 23 months the average age- and gender-adjusted Constant score (CS) was 77.8 % (±26 %). According to the etiology, patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) showed a higher CS of 83 % compared with patients with fracture sequelae (CS 73 %) and compared with patients who had undergone RSA as a revision for failed shoulder arthroplasty (CS 69 %). The difference was significant comparing the cuff tear arthropathy patients with the revision surgery patients (p = 0.035). Within the group of fracture sequelae, patients with type three sequelae according to the Boileau classification (surgical neck nonunion) had a significantly worse outcome compared with the type four fracture sequelae patients (severe tuberosity dislocation) (CS 57 vs. 87 %, p = 0.01). The overall complication rate was 27 % with 8 % infections and 9 % dislocations. Revision surgery was necessary in 11.5 % with removal or replacement of the implants in 8 %. Inferior scapular notching was detected in 43 % of the patients. These patients had an inferior CS (70 ± 18 %) compared with patients without scapular notching (84 ± 25 %, p = 0.015). The incidence of scapular notching was significantly reduced with an increasing inferior overlap of the glenosphere.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we found the preoperative etiology to influence the clinical results after RSA with superior results given for cuff tear arthropathy and inferior results for revision arthroplasty and fracture sequelae type three. Further, we found a correlation between scapular notching and the clinical outcome. The inferior scapular notching was significantly reduced by an increased inferior glenosphere overlap. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, treatment study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23385301     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1688-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  20 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Ten questions on prosthetic shoulder infection.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Pinder; Joshua Cy Ong; R Stephen Bale; Ian A Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-03-08

3.  Early Versus Late Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Adam Seidl; Daniel Sholder; William Warrender; Michael Livesey; Gerald Williams; Joseph Abboud; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-07

4.  [Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae].

Authors:  C Gwinner; S Greiner; C Gerhardt; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph J King; Kevin W Farmer; Aimee M Struk; Thomas W Wright
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of contemporary literature.

Authors:  L Kostretzis; P Konstantinou; I Pinto; M Shahin; K Ditsios; P Papadopoulos
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 7.  Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: anatomical vs reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Pierre Mansat; Nicolas Bonnevialle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review.

Authors:  U G Longo; S Petrillo; A Berton; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-17

Review 9.  Activity following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: What should surgeons be advising?

Authors:  Scott J MacInnes; Katherine E Mackie; Andrew Titchener; Rebekah Gibbons; Allan W Wang
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-08

10.  Long - Term survivorship and clinical and radiological follow - up of the primary uncemented Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Johannes H M van Ochten; Marco van der Pluijm; Martin Pouw; Quinten T M Felsch; Petra Heesterbeek; Maarten J de Vos
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.