Literature DB >> 34003464

Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of contemporary literature.

L Kostretzis1, P Konstantinou2, I Pinto2, M Shahin3, K Ditsios2, P Papadopoulos2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reverse shoulder prostheses are increasingly used for treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy and other degenerative shoulder diseases. In recent years, aiming for bone stock preservation has led to the design of metaphyseal humeral components without a stem. The aims of this study were to evaluate the complication and reintervention rates, as well as the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with stemless implants.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was completed until May 2020 using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases, according to PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS: The literature search revealed 2942 studies, of which 13 were included in this review, with a total of 517 patients and a mean follow-up between 6.4 and 101.6 months. The total complication rate was 6.5%, while 3.3% were humeral associated complications. Finally, the rate of shoulders that underwent a reintervention was 6.7%, with 1.4% relating to a humeral component reason. Stemless RSA led to substantial improvements in patient reported outcome measures and range of motion across all studies. Scapular notching was reported in 15.2%, and lucencies around humeral component were reported in 0.8% of shoulders.
CONCLUSION: Stemless RSA resulted in low complication and reintervention rates at the mid-term follow-up. The reported clinical and radiological outcomes showed that these prostheses have at least equivalent outcomes with their stemmed counterparts. Further studies are required to investigate the long-term longevity and performance of the stemless humeral implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Systematic Review.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Patient-reported outcome measures; Radiologic evaluation; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Revision; Shoulder; Stemless; Systematic review

Year:  2021        PMID: 34003464     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-021-00710-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  20 in total

Review 1.  Grammont's idea: The story of Paul Grammont's functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Baulot; François Sirveaux; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Long-term results of the reverse Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS).

Authors:  Sascha Beck; Theodor Patsalis; André Busch; Florian Dittrich; Marcel Dudda; Marcus Jäger; Alexander Wegner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study.

Authors:  Bakir Kadum; Sebastian Mukka; Erling Englund; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group.

Authors:  B D Coleman; K M Khan; N Maffulli; J L Cook; J D Wark
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral prosthesis without a stem: survivorship, early to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a prospective study from an independent centre.

Authors:  Andreas Leonidou; Siddharth Virani; Christopher Buckle; Clarence Yeoh; Jaikumar Relwani
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-08-20

6.  Revision shoulder arthroplasty from resurfacing to non-cemented short-stem reverse prosthesis.

Authors:  L Natera; J Bruguera; E Atoun; O Levy
Journal:  Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-02

7.  Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; John W Sperling; George H Haidukewych; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; T Bradley Edwards; Allen Deutsch; Anup Shah; Thomas Bruckner; Markus Loew; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem.

Authors:  Ehud Atoun; Alexander Van Tongel; Nir Hous; Ali Narvani; Jai Relwani; Ruben Abraham; Ofer Levy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Cementless metaphyseal reverse shoulder arthroplasty: our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Gian Mario Micheloni; Gianpaolo Salmaso; Mattia Berti; Sara Bortolato; Gino Zecchinato; Alberto Momoli; Stefano Giaretta
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.