BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal (GI) surgery remains a major problem. Although numerous studies have been undertaken on the role of tissue adhesives as GI anastomotic sealants, no clear overview has been presented. This systematic review aims to provide a clear overview of recent experimental and clinical research on the sealing of different levels of GI anastomosis with tissue adhesives. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases for clinical and experimental articles published after 2000. We included articles only if these addressed a tissue adhesive applied around a GI anastomosis to prevent anastomotic leakage or decrease leakage-related complications. We categorized results according to level of anastomosis, category of tissue adhesive, and level of evidence. RESULTS: We included 48 studies: three on esophageal anastomosis, 13 on gastric anastomosis, four on pancreatic anastomosis, eight on small intestinal anastomosis, and 20 on colorectal anastomosis; 15 of the studies were on humans. CONCLUSIONS: Research on ileal and gastric/bariatric anastomosis reveals promising results for fibrin glue sealing for specific clinical indications. Sealing of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis does not seem to be useful for high-risk patients; however, research in this field is limited. Ileal anastomotic sealing was promising in every included study, and calls for clinical evaluation. For colorectal anastomoses, sealing with fibrin glue sealing seems to have more positive results than with cyanoacrylate. Further research should concentrate on the clinical evaluation of promising experimental results as well as on new types of tissue adhesives. This research field would benefit from a systematic experimental approach with comparable methodology.
BACKGROUND:Anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal (GI) surgery remains a major problem. Although numerous studies have been undertaken on the role of tissue adhesives as GI anastomotic sealants, no clear overview has been presented. This systematic review aims to provide a clear overview of recent experimental and clinical research on the sealing of different levels of GI anastomosis with tissue adhesives. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases for clinical and experimental articles published after 2000. We included articles only if these addressed a tissue adhesive applied around a GI anastomosis to prevent anastomotic leakage or decrease leakage-related complications. We categorized results according to level of anastomosis, category of tissue adhesive, and level of evidence. RESULTS: We included 48 studies: three on esophageal anastomosis, 13 on gastric anastomosis, four on pancreatic anastomosis, eight on small intestinal anastomosis, and 20 on colorectal anastomosis; 15 of the studies were on humans. CONCLUSIONS: Research on ileal and gastric/bariatric anastomosis reveals promising results for fibrin glue sealing for specific clinical indications. Sealing of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis does not seem to be useful for high-risk patients; however, research in this field is limited. Ileal anastomotic sealing was promising in every included study, and calls for clinical evaluation. For colorectal anastomoses, sealing with fibrin glue sealing seems to have more positive results than with cyanoacrylate. Further research should concentrate on the clinical evaluation of promising experimental results as well as on new types of tissue adhesives. This research field would benefit from a systematic experimental approach with comparable methodology.
Authors: Zhouqiao Wu; Konstantinos A Vakalopoulos; Geesien S A Boersema; Leonard F Kroese; King H Lam; Paul H van der Horst; Irene M Mulder; Yvonne M Bastiaansen-Jenniskens; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: K Stergios; K Kontzoglou; V Pergialiotis; L M Korou; M Frountzas; O Lalude; N Nikiteas; D N Perrea Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Nora G Kern; Adam M Behrens; Priya Srinivasan; Christopher T Rossi; John L Daristotle; Peter Kofinas; Anthony D Sandler Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Adam M Behrens; Nora G Lee; Brendan J Casey; Priya Srinivasan; Michael J Sikorski; John L Daristotle; Anthony D Sandler; Peter Kofinas Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 30.849