Literature DB >> 23384491

Changing presentation of knee dislocation and vascular injury from high-energy trauma to low-energy falls in the morbidly obese.

Andrew G Georgiadis1, Farah H Mohammad, Kristin T Mizerik, Timothy J Nypaver, Alexander D Shepard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reports in the literature of low-energy (LE) knee dislocation (KD) in obese patients have been increasing. This study was undertaken to define the risk factors for KD by LE mechanisms and the outcomes of these patients compared with those with high-energy (HE) trauma.
METHODS: All patients with a complete KD presenting to the emergency department of a large urban level I trauma center were reviewed. Patient information collected included age, sex, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), injury mechanism, neurovascular and orthopedic injuries, and operations performed to treat vascular injuries. Risk factors for KD and concomitant injuries were compared between HE traumatic dislocations and LE dislocations in obese patients (BMI >30 kg/m(2)), including stratification for increasing levels of obesity.
RESULTS: Between January 1995 and April 2012, 53 patients with KD were identified. The mechanism of injury was HE in 28 (53%) and LE in 25 (47%). Of the LE KDs, 18 (72%) were related to obesity (BMI >30 kg/m(2)). Obese patients with LE trauma were more likely to have associated nerve injuries (50% vs 6%; P < .001), vascular injuries requiring intervention (33% vs 9%; P = .048), and vascular surgical repairs (28% vs 6%; P = .038) than patients with HE traumatic dislocations. These rates were highest in the patients with a BMI >40 kg/m(2). Although all LE KDs in the obese involved an isolated extremity, the hospital lengths of stay were comparable to those with HE KDs who frequently had multisystem trauma (8.7 vs 11.4 days). During a 17-year period, LE KDs in the obese represented an increasing proportion, from 17% in 1995 to 2000 up to 53% in 2007 to 2012, and the eventual majority of all KDs at our institution (P = .024).
CONCLUSIONS: LE KDs in obese patients are becoming increasingly prevalent. These patients are more likely to have nerve and vascular injuries and are more likely to undergo vascular repair than patients with HE trauma. The epidemic of obesity in the United States presents unique challenges in the identification and treatment of patients with LE KD and their associated injuries.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23384491     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  13 in total

1.  What is the frequency of vascular injury after knee dislocation?

Authors:  Kyle M Natsuhara; Michael G Yeranosian; Jeremiah R Cohen; Jeffrey C Wang; David R McAllister; Frank A Petrigliano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Poly-traumatic multi-ligament knee injuries: is the knee the limiting factor?

Authors:  Jarret M Woodmass; Nick R Johnson; Rohith Mohan; Aaron J Krych; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  CORR Insights(®): Can Vascular Injury be Appropriately Assessed With Physical Examination After Knee Dislocation?

Authors:  Burak Beksaç
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Management of knee dislocation prior to ligament reconstruction: What is the current evidence? Update of a universal treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Alexander Maslaris; Olaf Brinkmann; Matthias Bungartz; Christian Krettek; Michael Jagodzinski; Emmanouil Liodakis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-22

5.  The changing demographics of knee dislocation: a retrospective database review.

Authors:  Gabriel A Arom; Michael G Yeranosian; Frank A Petrigliano; Rodney D Terrell; David R McAllister
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does age predict outcome after multiligament knee reconstruction for the dislocated knee? 2- to 22-year follow-up.

Authors:  Nate M Levy; Aaron J Krych; Mario Hevesi; Patrick J Reardon; Ayoosh Pareek; Michael J Stuart; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Can Vascular Injury be Appropriately Assessed With Physical Examination After Knee Dislocation?

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; Nicholas R Scarcella; Joshua K Napora; Heather A Vallier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Classifications in Brief: The Schenck Classification of Knee Dislocations.

Authors:  Collin Patrick Goebel; Christopher Domes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Current concepts in acute knee dislocation: the missed diagnosis?

Authors:  Lesley McKee; Mazin S Ibrahim; Trevor Lawrence; Ioannis P Pengas; Wasim S Khan
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-06-27

10.  Knee Dislocations: Lessons Learned From 20-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Robert C Schenck; Dustin L Richter; Daniel C Wascher
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.