Literature DB >> 24214822

The changing demographics of knee dislocation: a retrospective database review.

Gabriel A Arom1, Michael G Yeranosian, Frank A Petrigliano, Rodney D Terrell, David R McAllister.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee dislocations are uncommon but devastating orthopaedic injuries. Little is known about their frequency and the types of patients who are affected. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using a large national insurance database, we determined (1) the incidence of knee dislocation in patients with orthopaedic injuries and examined the incidence as a function of (2) year of diagnosis, (3) dislocation type (open versus closed, direction), and (4) patient demographic factors (sex, age).
METHODS: We searched the PearlDiver database, a national database of private insurance records consisting of 11 million patients with orthopaedic diagnoses, using diagnosis (ICD-9-CM) codes for knee dislocation between the years 2004 and 2009. The PearlDiver database does not include Medicare, Medicaid, or uninsured patients. Patients were stratified by age, sex, and year of diagnosis. Incidence was defined as the number of dislocation events per 100 patient-years.
RESULTS: We identified 8050 dislocations, representing an incidence of 0.072 events per 100 patient-years between 2004 and 2009. Annual dislocation incidence did not increase during the 6-year study period. Of the 8050 dislocations, 1333 (17%) were open and 6717 (83%) were closed, representing an incidence of 0.060 per 100 for closed dislocations and 0.012 per 100 for open dislocations. The most common direction of dislocation was unspecified or other (65%), followed by anterior (13%), lateral (11%), posterior (6%), and medial (5%). Of the patients sustaining dislocations, 4172 (52%) were female and 3878 (48%) were male. Males displayed an increased risk of knee dislocation compared to females (odds ratio = 1.09). The mean patient age was 35 years, and patient age was inversely correlated to the incidence of knee dislocation (10-year odds ratio = 0.77).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that knee dislocation might represent a significantly larger burden among orthopaedic injuries than previously thought. The finding that males and females have a nearly equal risk of knee dislocation enhances the diagnosing physician's clinical suspicion of this injury. Future large prospective studies analyzing the various causes of knee dislocation could provide insight into the changing demographics of this injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24214822      PMCID: PMC4117912          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3373-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  32 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of knee dislocations.

Authors:  B Brautigan; D L Johnson
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.182

2.  Injuries of the popliteal artery associated with fractures and dislocations.

Authors:  N W HOOVER
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Low-velocity knee dislocation in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  Jason Folt; Taher Vohra
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 4.  Dislocation of the knee.

Authors:  A Robertson; R W Nutton; J F Keating
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

5.  Spontaneous popliteal vascular injury in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  R T Hagino; J D DeCaprio; R J Valentine; G P Clagett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Demographic trends in arthroscopic SLAP repair in the United States.

Authors:  Alan L Zhang; Christopher Kreulen; Stephanie S Ngo; Sharon L Hame; Jeffrey C Wang; Seth C Gamradt
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Analysis of rotator cuff repair trends in a large private insurance population.

Authors:  Alan L Zhang; Scott R Montgomery; Stephanie S Ngo; Sharon L Hame; Jeffrey C Wang; Seth C Gamradt
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Trends and demographics in hip arthroscopy in the United States.

Authors:  Scott R Montgomery; Stephanie S Ngo; Taylor Hobson; Shawn Nguyen; Ram Alluri; Jeffrey C Wang; Sharon L Hame
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Comparison of practice patterns in total ankle replacement and ankle fusion in the United States.

Authors:  Rodney D Terrell; Scott R Montgomery; William C Pannell; Michael I Sandlin; Hirokazu Inoue; Jeffrey C Wang; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Trends in meniscus repair and meniscectomy in the United States, 2005-2011.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Abrams; Rachel M Frank; Anil K Gupta; Joshua D Harris; Frank M McCormick; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Current Concepts and Controversies in Rehabilitation After Surgery for Multiple Ligament Knee Injury.

Authors:  Andrew D Lynch; Terese Chmielewski; Lane Bailey; Michael Stuart; Jonathan Cooper; Cathy Coady; Terrance Sgroi; Johnny Owens; Robert Schenck; Daniel Whelan; Volker Musahl; James Irrgang
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  Multiligamentous injuries and knee dislocations.

Authors:  Lana H Gimber; Luke R Scalcione; Andrew Rowan; Jolene C Hardy; David M Melville; Mihra S Taljanovic
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Geographic variation in fasciotomy during operative management of tibia fractures.

Authors:  Mark Anders; Christopher Mutty; Allison Cornwall
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-09

4.  Gait adaptations following multiple-ligament knee reconstruction occur with altered knee kinematics during level walking.

Authors:  Corey J Scholes; Joe T Lynch; Milad Ebrahimi; Brett A Fritsch; David A Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Multi-ligament reconstructions as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in arthroscopic surgery.

Authors:  Justin Kyhos; Daniel Johnson; Bejan Alvandi; Michael Terry; Vehniah Tjong
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Surgical treatment of multiligament knee injuries.

Authors:  Shane Cook; T J Ridley; Mark A McCarthy; Yubo Gao; Brian R Wolf; Annunziato Amendola; Matthew J Bollier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Epidemiology of multiligament knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Sean M Wilson; Nabil Mehta; Huong T Do; Hassan Ghomrawi; Stephen Lyman; Robert G Marx
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Simultaneous Bilateral Femur Fractures in Children: A Case Series from a Pediatric Level I Trauma Center and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ronit Shah; Daniel Miller; Mahmoud A Mahmoud; Alexandre Arkader
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

9.  National trends, 90-day readmission and subsequent knee surgery following multi-ligament knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Charles Qin; Cameron Roth; Cody Lee; Aravind Athiviraham
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-03

10.  The Demographics of Fractures and Dislocations Across the Entire United States due to Common Sports and Recreational Activities.

Authors:  Cory Meixner; Randall T Loder
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.