Literature DB >> 23382707

Genetics of ribosomal proteins: "curiouser and curiouser".

Tamara Terzian1, Neil Box.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382707      PMCID: PMC3561088          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Genet        ISSN: 1553-7390            Impact factor:   5.917


× No keyword cloud information.

The Mystery of Minutes

Lewis Carroll wrote about Alice, but he might just as well have been referring to Calvin Bridges. As a student in T.H. Morgan's lab, Bridges described some of the earliest Drosophila mutations, including so-called Minutes, in which heterozygotes exhibited small body size and developmental abnormalities in tissues undergoing rapid cell division, and homozygotes were lethal [1]. At the time, it was curious how dozens of different loci could yield the same phenotype, and even curiouser how flies multiply heterozygous at different Minute loci were no more severely affected than a single Minute mutant. This mystery—how dozens of genes could encode similar but separate proliferative functions in all cells—was solved more than 50 years later with the realization that mutations of ribosomal protein genes occur in almost all Minute loci [2]. In this issue of PLOS Genetics, Watkins-Chow et al. [1] add to a more recent curiosity: even though ribosomes (and ribosomal protein [RP] genes) have remained nearly identical across more than a billion years of evolution, mutations of RP genes in mice and in humans give rise to a surprising diversity of phenotypes. This work adds a new piece to a very old puzzle, and suggests the possibility that RP genes do more than just contribute to ribosomes.

RP Mutations in Mammals: More than Minutes

To date, 11 different RP mutant mice have now been reported. These mice carry deletions, missense, or splicing mutations that have arisen spontaneously, from N-Ethyl-N-Nitrosurea (ENU) mutagenesis screens, or from targeted gene deletion [1]–[11] (Table 1). Overall, RP mutant mice exhibit an unexpected array and diversity of phenotypes. For example, the spontaneous mutant Belly spot and tail is caused by a splicing abnormality in Rpl24 [6]; heterozygous mutants (Rpl24) are small with white hind feet, a midline belly spot (Bst), abnormal retinal development, and skeletal abnormalities that include a curly tail [4]. Heterozygosity for a targeted mutation of Rps6 causes embryonic lethality [12], while heterozygosity for targeted mutations of Rpl22 or of Rpl29 have no effect. (Homozygosity for targeted mutations of Rpl22 and of Rpl29 causes a T-cell–specific developmental defect [6] and generalized reduced growth [8], respectively.) Mice heterozygous for mutations in Rps19, Rps20, or Rpl27a exhibit epidermal hyperpigmentation, anemia, and reduced body size while the Rpl27a heterozygotes also exhibit cerebellar ataxia. Rps19-null mice are embryonic lethal prior to implantation [10]. CD74-Nid67 mice with a heterozygous deletion of eight genes including Rps14 developed macrocytic anemia and other hematopoietic defects [11]. Finally, heterozygous Rpl38 mutants had abnormalities of skeletal patterning [9].
Table 1

Mouse Models of Ribosomal Proteins.

GeneProtein Synthesis DefectPhenotypesp53-DependentRefs
Rpl24 Decreased global protein synthesis Bst/+: Small body size, bell spot and abnormal skeletal and eye morphologyBst/Bst: Embryonic lethalYesN/A [2] [4]
Rps6 N/A +/−: Embryonic lethalPartial [12]
Rpl22 N/A+/−: No phenotype−/−: Viable, defect in alpha-beta T-cellsYes [6]
Rpl29 Decreased global protein synthesis +/−: No phenotype−/−: Viable, mild growth retardationYes [8]
Rps19 N/A Dsk3/+: Small body size, belly spot, anemia and epidermal hypermelanosisDsk3/Dsk3: Embryonic lethal+/−: No phenotype−/−: Embryonic lethalYesN/AN/AN/A [7] [28] [10] [10]
Rps20 N/A Dsk4/+: Small body size, belly spot, anemia and epidermal hypermelanosisDsk4/Dsk4: Embryonic lethalYesN/A [7] [28]
Rps14 1 CD74-Nid67+/− Macrocytic anemiaCD74-Nid67−/− N/AYes [11]
Rpl27a N/A SFA/+: Small body size, pancytopenia, epidermal hypermelanosis, cerebellar ataxiaSFA/SFA: Embryonic lethalYesNo [5]
Rpl38 2 Translational control of Hox mRNAs Ts/+ : Skeletal patterning abnormalitiesTs/Ts: Embryonic lethalNoN/A [9]
Rps7 18S rRNA pre-processing Zma/+: Small body size, belly spot, skeletal, eye and neuro-anatomical defects. 74% Viability (BALB/cJ×C57BL/6J), 100% embryonic lethal on N4 C57BL/6J.Zma/Zma: Embryonic lethalMtu/+: Small body size, belly spot, skeletal and neuro-anatomical abnormalities. 26% Viability on C3H/HeJ background.Mtu/Mtu: Embryonic lethalYesN/AN/AN/A [1]

Rps14 is one of eight genes deleted in the CD74-Nid67 mouse. It is the major candidate gene.

Rpl38 is also mutated in the Tail-short Shionogi (Tss) and Rabo torcido (Rbt) mice.

+/−: heterozygous gene deletion; −/−: homozygous gene deletion; rRNA: ribosomal RNA. N4:4th generation cross.

Mouse RP mutations: Bst: Belly spot; Dsk: Dark skin; SFA: Sooty Foot Ataxia; Ts: Tail short; Mtu: Montu; Zma: Zuma.

Rps14 is one of eight genes deleted in the CD74-Nid67 mouse. It is the major candidate gene. Rpl38 is also mutated in the Tail-short Shionogi (Tss) and Rabo torcido (Rbt) mice. +/−: heterozygous gene deletion; −/−: homozygous gene deletion; rRNA: ribosomal RNA. N4:4th generation cross. Mouse RP mutations: Bst: Belly spot; Dsk: Dark skin; SFA: Sooty Foot Ataxia; Ts: Tail short; Mtu: Montu; Zma: Zuma. Watkins-Chow et al. [1] present two different missense alleles of Rps7, Montu (Mtu) and Zuma (Zma), that were generated from an ENU mutagenesis screen. Most Rps7 mice die in utero (74% on a C3H/HeJ background), but the survivors show pleiotropic phenotypes including reduced body size, abnormal skeletal morphology, and mid-ventral white spotting. This phenotype cluster is reproduced in Rps7 mice and is similar to that in Rpl24 mutant mice [1]. These observations support the existence of distinctive spatial and temporal characteristics for RPs [13]: Rps7, Rps19, Rps20, and Rpl24 may be necessary for melanocyte development [1], [2], [4], [7], while Rps6, Rps19, Rps20, and Rpl27a are important for keratinocytes [3], [7]. Additionally, Rps7, Rpl24, and Rpl38 are crucial for skeletal and retinal development [1], [2], [9] and Rps14, Rps19, Rps20, and Rpl27a are necessary for hematopoeisis [3], [7], [11]. RP genotype–phenotype correlations are also found in humans where mutations cause diseases with similarly complex clinical manifestations such as Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA). DBA is characterized by diverse abnormalities including anemia, congenital craniofacial malformations, and defects in kidney development [14].

The Role of p53 in RP Haploinsufficiency Phenotypes

While disturbances in ribosome biogenesis have been linked to many human diseases [15], there is also increasing evidence that RP mutations may be associated with cancer susceptibility [15]–[17]. In keeping with these observations, a sensitive connection between RPs and the tumor suppressor p53 has been identified (reviewed in [18]). p53 is a major cellular stress sensor that is best known for its ability to induce apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and senescence in response to a variety of insults including DNA damage, oncogene activation, hypoxia, and more recently, ribosomal stress [19]. Thus, the p53 pathway provides a surveillance mechanism for the preservation of genomic and ribosomal integrity. Perturbation of ribosomal integrity induces the release of several RPs from the nucleolus that interact with and suppress the activity of the main negative regulator of p53, Mdm2, leading to the stabilization and activation of p53 [20]–[25]. This is observed in a number of RP mutant mice that exhibit cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in the affected cell types and in which the resulting pathologies are ameliorated or suppressed by p53 deletion (Table 1). In Rps19, Rps20, Rpl24, Rpl27a, and Rps7 mice, the removal of one p53 copy is sufficient to alleviate all phenotypic abnormalities [1]–[3], [7]. In the case of Rps6 mice, fetal mortality is delayed by only a couple of days in the absence of p53 [12]. Amazingly, the embryonic lethality of Rps7 mice was completely suppressed by the loss of one p53 allele, and Rps7:p53 mice are for the most part identical to their wild-type littermates [1]. Taken together, these experiments establish p53 as a true sensor of nucleolar stress and highlight the extraribosomal activity of RPs as modulators of the Mdm2p53 pathway.

RP Functions in Mutant Mice

Mutant RP phenotypes in mice appear to be the result of three distinct mechanisms: 1) global suppression of protein synthesis; 2) specific suppression of protein synthesis; and 3) extra-ribosomal functions. Diminished global protein synthesis was identified in Rpl24 (∼30% reduced) and Rpl29 mouse neural tube and somites (∼45% reduced), although no concurrent phenotype was described [9]. In Rps7 mice, a novel defect in 18S rRNA preprocessing was identified in brain and liver, without a reduction in protein synthesis. We speculate that an accompanying reduction in protein synthesis could explain the homozygous embryonic lethality in these mice. On the other hand, the abnormal homeotic transformations observed in Rpl38 mice were attributed to the unique role of Rpl38 in translation of specific Hox mRNAs rather than to a global effect [9]. RPL38 appeared to facilitate 80S complex formation during the earliest steps of translation initiation on selective Hox mRNAs. In addition to these global and gene-specific translational defects, extra-ribosomal functions of numerous RPs have been described in prokaryotes and lower eukaryotes such as yeast and flies, and in cultured human cells [13], [26], [27]. This expanding list of functions includes cellular apoptosis, transcription and mRNA processing, DNA repair, development, and tumorigenesis. To date, the ability of RPs to activate p53 is the only described extra-ribosomal function in mice. In Rps7 mice, impaired rRNA preprocessing and p53 activation occur simultaneously, illustrating the complex roles of RPs in mammalian tissues. With this in mind, mouse RP phenotypes (heterozygous and homozygous) need to be analyzed on a p53-null as well as on a p53 wild-type genetic background. Since so little is known about how changes in ribosomal protein levels may impact cellular function in vivo, a full repertoire of mouse RP models and improved characterization are sorely needed. Due to the essential nature of RPs, it is apparent that even small perturbations to their functions can result in an increasing array of diseases, and it is clear now more than ever that the mystery of the underlying mechanistic basis for RP mutant phenotypes needs to be solved before state-of-the art translational approaches can bring effective treatments. Moreover, additional mouse models for RP disorders will provide an important preclinical resource for developing new treatments of ribosomopathies.
  28 in total

1.  Regulation of HDM2 activity by the ribosomal protein L11.

Authors:  Marion A E Lohrum; Robert L Ludwig; Michael H G Kubbutat; Mary Hanlon; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Global growth deficiencies in mice lacking the ribosomal protein HIP/RPL29.

Authors:  Catherine B Kirn-Safran; Daniel S Oristian; Richard J Focht; Shaila G Parker; Jay L Vivian; Daniel D Carson
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.780

3.  Extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins.

Authors:  I G Wool
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Ribosomal protein S6 gene haploinsufficiency is associated with activation of a p53-dependent checkpoint during gastrulation.

Authors:  Linda Panić; Sanda Tamarut; Melanie Sticker-Jantscheff; Martina Barkić; Davor Solter; Miljana Uzelac; Kristina Grabusić; Sinisa Volarević
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Targeted disruption of the ribosomal protein S19 gene is lethal prior to implantation.

Authors:  Hans Matsson; Edward J Davey; Natalia Draptchinskaia; Isao Hamaguchi; Andreas Ooka; Per Levéen; Erik Forsberg; Stefan Karlsson; Niklas Dahl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Genetics of dark skin in mice.

Authors:  Karen R Fitch; Kelly A McGowan; Catherine D van Raamsdonk; Helmut Fuchs; Daekee Lee; Anne Puech; Yann Hérault; David W Threadgill; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Gregory S Barsh
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Ribosomal protein L23 activates p53 by inhibiting MDM2 function in response to ribosomal perturbation but not to translation inhibition.

Authors:  Mu-Shui Dai; Shelya X Zeng; Yetao Jin; Xiao-Xin Sun; Larry David; Hua Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Ribosomal protein L24 defect in belly spot and tail (Bst), a mouse Minute.

Authors:  Edward R Oliver; Thomas L Saunders; Susan A Tarlé; Tom Glaser
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Ablation of ribosomal protein L22 selectively impairs alphabeta T cell development by activation of a p53-dependent checkpoint.

Authors:  Stephen J Anderson; Jens Peter Holst Lauritsen; Matthew G Hartman; Ann Marie Digeorge Foushee; Juliette M Lefebvre; Susan A Shinton; Brenda Gerhardt; Richard R Hardy; Tamas Oravecz; David L Wiest
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 31.745

10.  Inhibition of MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation by ribosomal protein L5.

Authors:  Mu-Shui Dai; Hua Lu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  13 in total

1.  Long-range enhancers regulating Myc expression are required for normal facial morphogenesis.

Authors:  Veli Vural Uslu; Massimo Petretich; Sandra Ruf; Katja Langenfeld; Nuno A Fonseca; John C Marioni; François Spitz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Ribosomal proteins and human diseases: pathogenesis, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Subhasree Nag; Xu Zhang; Ming-Hai Wang; Hui Wang; Jianwei Zhou; Ruiwen Zhang
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 12.944

Review 3.  Therapeutic interventions to disrupt the protein synthetic machinery in melanoma.

Authors:  Gregory R Kardos; Gavin P Robertson
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.693

Review 4.  Functions of ribosomal proteins in assembly of eukaryotic ribosomes in vivo.

Authors:  Jesus de la Cruz; Katrin Karbstein; John L Woolford
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  Growth inhibitory effects of large subunit ribosomal proteins in melanoma.

Authors:  Gregory R Kardos; Mu-Shui Dai; Gavin P Robertson
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.693

6.  Ribosomal Protein RPL27a Promotes Female Gametophyte Development in a Dose-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Agustin Zsögön; Dóra Szakonyi; Xiuling Shi; Mary E Byrne
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Loss-of-function mutations in the RNA biogenesis factor NAF1 predispose to pulmonary fibrosis-emphysema.

Authors:  Susan E Stanley; Dustin L Gable; Christa L Wagner; Thomas M Carlile; Vidya Sagar Hanumanthu; Joshua D Podlevsky; Sara E Khalil; Amy E DeZern; Maria F Rojas-Duran; Carolyn D Applegate; Jonathan K Alder; Erin M Parry; Wendy V Gilbert; Mary Armanios
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 8.  Mouse Models of Rare Craniofacial Disorders.

Authors:  Annita Achilleos; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Ribosomopathies: mechanisms of disease.

Authors:  Hani Nakhoul; Jiangwei Ke; Xiang Zhou; Wenjuan Liao; Shelya X Zeng; Hua Lu
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Blood Disord       Date:  2014-08-14

10.  The global translation profile in a ribosomal protein mutant resembles that of an eIF3 mutant.

Authors:  Bayu Sisay Tiruneh; Byung-Hoon Kim; Daniel R Gallie; Bijoyita Roy; Albrecht G von Arnim
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.