Literature DB >> 23382123

Strategies for using peer-assisted learning effectively in an undergraduate bioinformatics course.

Casey Shapiro1, Carlos Ayon, Jordan Moberg-Parker, Marc Levis-Fitzgerald, Erin R Sanders.   

Abstract

This study used a mixed methods approach to evaluate hybrid peer-assisted learning approaches incorporated into a bioinformatics tutorial for a genome annotation research project. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from undergraduates who enrolled in a research-based laboratory course during two different academic terms at UCLA. Findings indicate that a critical feature of the peer-assisted learning approach is to have near-peer leaders with genome annotation experience, allowing them to communicate technical and conceptual aspects of the process in the context of a research project (a.k.a., the "big picture"). These characteristics are important for creating connections between the wet lab experiments and the computer lab activities, engendering excitement about the research project and fostering engagement in bioinformatics as a discipline. Likewise, it is essential to couple tutorial training in genome annotation with appropriate instructional materials, providing detailed, step-by-step instructions for database navigation. Finally, the assessment results support this hybrid peer-assisted learning approach as a model for undergraduates to successfully learn bioinformatics in a course setting.
Copyright © 2012 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382123     DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1470-8175            Impact factor:   1.160


  8 in total

1.  Implementation and assessment of a yeast orphan gene research project: involving undergraduates in authentic research experiences and progressing our understanding of uncharacterized open reading frames.

Authors:  Bethany V Bowling; Patrick J Schultheis; Erin D Strome
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 2.  A survey of scholarly literature describing the field of bioinformatics education and bioinformatics educational research.

Authors:  Alejandra J Magana; Manaz Taleyarkhan; Daniela Rivera Alvarado; Michael Kane; John Springer; Kari Clase
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Teaching the ABCs of bioinformatics: a brief introduction to the Applied Bioinformatics Course.

Authors:  Jingchu Luo
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Using mobile sequencers in an academic classroom.

Authors:  Sophie Zaaijer; Yaniv Erlich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Training for translation between disciplines: a philosophy for life and data sciences curricula.

Authors:  K Anton Feenstra; Sanne Abeln; Johan A Westerhuis; Filipe Brancos Dos Santos; Douwe Molenaar; Bas Teusink; Huub C J Hoefsloot; Jaap Heringa
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Fear of the CURE: A Beginner's Guide to Overcoming Barriers in Creating a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience.

Authors:  Brinda Govindan; Sarah Pickett; Blake Riggs
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2020-05-29

7.  Making authentic science accessible-the benefits and challenges of integrating bioinformatics into a high-school science curriculum.

Authors:  Yossy Machluf; Hadas Gelbart; Shifra Ben-Dor; Anat Yarden
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Asynchronous Online Lecture Videos.

Authors:  Ronny C Choe; Zorica Scuric; Ethan Eshkol; Sean Cruser; Ava Arndt; Robert Cox; Shannon P Toma; Casey Shapiro; Marc Levis-Fitzgerald; Greg Barnes; Rachelle H Crosbie
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.