Literature DB >> 23381522

Group Health's participation in a shared decision-making demonstration yielded lessons, such as role of culture change.

Jaime King1, Benjamin Moulton.   

Abstract

In 2007 Washington State became the first state to enact legislation encouraging the use of shared decision making and decision aids to address deficiencies in the informed-consent process. Group Health volunteered to fulfill a legislated mandate to study the costs and benefits of integrating these shared decision-making processes into clinical practice across a range of conditions for which multiple treatment options are available. The Group Health Demonstration Project, conducted during 2009-11, yielded five key lessons for successful implementation, including the synergy between efforts to reduce practice variation and increase shared decision making; the need to support modifications in practice with changes in physician training and culture; and the value of identifying best implementation methods through constant evaluation and iterative improvement. These lessons, and the legislated provisions that supported successful implementation, can guide other states and health care institutions moving toward informed patient choice as the standard of care for medical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23381522     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  11 in total

1.  The Feasibility of Sophisticated Multicriteria Support for Clinical Decisions.

Authors:  James G Dolan; Peter J Veazie
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Development and validation of the primary care team dynamics survey.

Authors:  Hummy Song; Alyna T Chien; Josephine Fisher; Julia Martin; Antoinette S Peters; Karen Hacker; Meredith B Rosenthal; Sara J Singer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Teamwork and delegation in medical homes: primary care staff perspectives in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Gala True; Greg L Stewart; Michelle Lampman; Mary Pelak; Samantha L Solimeo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Chronic Disease Decision Making and "What Matters Most".

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Richard L Street; Andrew B Cohen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  From the Patient Perspective, Consent Forms Fall Short of Providing Information to Guide Decision Making.

Authors:  Christine J Manta; Jacqueline Ortiz; Benjamin W Moulton; Seema S Sonnad
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.243

6.  Safety in surgery: the role of shared decision-making.

Authors:  Alexandra E Page
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 7.  Improving health care quality and safety: the role of collective learning.

Authors:  Sara J Singer; Justin K Benzer; Sami U Hamdan
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2015-11-06

Review 8.  Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them - a scoping review.

Authors:  Isabelle Scholl; Allison LaRussa; Pola Hahlweg; Sarah Kobrin; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Predicting Future Elective Colon Resection for Diverticulitis Using Patterns of Health Care Utilization.

Authors:  Lucas W Thornblade; David R Flum; Abraham D Flaxman
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2018-01-24

10.  Let's Require Patients to Review a High-quality Decision Aid Before Receiving Important Tests and Treatments.

Authors:  Floyd J Fowler; Michael J Barry; Karen R Sepucha; Benjamin W Moulton
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.