Literature DB >> 23381064

Nurse observation during colonoscopy increases polyp detection: a randomized prospective study.

Harry R Aslanian1, Frederick K Shieh, Francis W Chan, Maria M Ciarleglio, Yanhong Deng, Jason N Rogart, Priya A Jamidar, Uzma D Siddiqui.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a second observer during colonoscopy increases adenoma detection.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing screening colonoscopy were prospectively randomized to routine colonoscopy or physician and nurse observation during withdrawal.
RESULTS: Of 502 patients, 249 were randomized to routine colonoscopy, and 253 to physician plus nurse observation during withdrawal. A total of 592 polyps were detected, 40 identified by the endoscopy nurse only. With nurse observation, 1.32 polyps and 0.82 adenomas were found per colonoscopy, vs. 1.03 polyps and 0.64 adenomas in the routine group, demonstrating a 1.29-fold and a 1.28-fold increase in the average number of polyps and of adenomas detected, respectively. The overall adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 44.1%, with trends toward increased ADR and all-polyp detection rate with nurse observation.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurse observation during colonoscopy resulted in an increase in the number of polyps and adenomas found per colonoscopy, along with a trend toward improved overall ADR and all-polyp detection rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23381064     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  28 in total

1.  Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Follow-up of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II.

Authors:  Vivian Ussui; Susan Coe; Cynthia Rizk; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Individual polyp detection rate in routine daily endoscopy practice depends on case-mix.

Authors:  R J L F Loffeld; B Liberov; P E P Dekkers
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Colorectal cancer prevention by a CLEAR principles-based colonoscopy protocol: an observational study.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Yuqi Wu; Meng-Han Tsai; Jiajia Zhang; Stephanie Chiodini; Piet C de Groen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.

Authors:  Hans-Dieter Allescher; Vincens Weingart
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 5.  Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Javier Aranda-Hernández; Jason Hwang; Gabor Kandel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Brian T Clark; Tarun Rustagi; Loren Laine
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats.

Authors:  Hendrikus Jm Pullens; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-16

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Alexander Meining
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 9.  Nurse's Roles in Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Narges Hashemi; Masoud Bahrami; Elham Tabesh; Paul Arbon
Journal:  J Prev (2022)       Date:  2022-08-24

10.  Differences with experienced nurse assistance during colonoscopy in detecting polyp and adenoma: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Weihong Wang; Lu Xu; Zhenfei Bao; Linyin Sun; Chunyan Hu; Feng Zhou; Lei Xu; Dingmei Shi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.