Literature DB >> 23380650

Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients.

Syrone Liu1, Jonathan Kullnat, Dennis Bourdette, Jack Simon, Dale F Kraemer, Charles Murchison, Bronwyn E Hamilton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incidental T2 white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in headache patients on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may prompt concern for demyelinating disease.
OBJECTIVE: We reviewed brain MRI studies in patients with headaches without known demyelinating disease to determine the prevalence meeting imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) using two different definitions of "juxtacortical" and "periventricular".
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing pre- and post-contrast MRI for headaches over a 25-month period were retrospectively identified. Exclusions included patients under age 10 and over 55 years or with known demyelinating disorder. Patients were classified as meeting: 1) Barkhof and 2) 2010 McDonald dissemination in space criteria for MS based on: FLAIR/T2 scans for WMH and enhanced T1-weighted images for enhancement. Both groups were further differentiated by defining "periventricular" and "juxtacortical" as WMH contacting ventricle and cortex (Barkhof "touching", McDonald "touching") versus WMH within 3 mm (Barkhof--3 mm, McDonald--3 mm).
RESULTS: 326/564 (58%) studies met inclusion criteria. WMH prevalence was 168/326 (51.53%). Barkhof "touching" criteria were met in 4/168 (2.4%) and in 12/168 (7.1%) of the 3 mm group. McDonald criteria were met in 41/168 (24.4%) for "touching" and 58/168 (34.5%) for 3 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Barkhof and McDonald criteria were met in 2.4-7.1% and 24.4-34.5%, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple sclerosis; clinically isolated syndrome; fluid attenuation inversion recovery; magnetic resonance imaging; radiologically isolated syndrome; white matter hyperintensity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23380650     DOI: 10.1177/1352458512471874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  25 in total

1.  Dark Rims: Novel Sequence Enhances Diagnostic Specificity in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  J-M Tillema; S D Weigand; M Dayan; Y Shu; O H Kantarci; C F Lucchinetti; J D Port
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  [Inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system].

Authors:  Armin Bachhuber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  The tension between early diagnosis and misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; John R Corboy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Impact of the 2017 McDonald criteria on clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Robert T Naismith; Anne H Cross
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Diagnostic performance of central vein sign for multiple sclerosis with a simplified three-lesion algorithm.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Richard Watts; Daniel Ontaneda; Martina Absinta; Pascal Sati; Daniel S Reich
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 6.  The current role of MRI in differentiating multiple sclerosis from its imaging mimics.

Authors:  Ruth Geraldes; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof; Nicola De Stefano; Christian Enzinger; Massimo Filippi; Monika Hofer; Friedemann Paul; Paolo Preziosa; Alex Rovira; Gabriele C DeLuca; Ludwig Kappos; Tarek Yousry; Franz Fazekas; Jette Frederiksen; Claudio Gasperini; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Nikos Evangelou; Jacqueline Palace
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Longitudinal Follow-up of a Cohort of Patients with Incidental Abnormal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings at Presentation and Their Risk of Developing Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Mio Nakamura; Mark Morris; Mirela Cerghet; Lonni Schultz; Stanton Elias
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2014

Review 8.  Radiologically isolated syndrome: from biological bases to practical management.

Authors:  Andres G Barboza; Edgar Carnero Contentti; Maria Celeste Curbelo; Mario Javier Halfon; Juan Ignacio Rojas; Berenice A Silva; Vladimiro Sinay; Santiago Tizio; Maria Celica Ysrraelit; Ricardo Alonso
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Radiologically Isolated Syndrome: A Review for Neuroradiologists.

Authors:  M Hosseiny; S D Newsome; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Incidence of Radiologically Isolated Syndrome: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Y Forslin; T Granberg; A Antwan Jumah; S Shams; P Aspelin; M Kristoffersen-Wiberg; J Martola; S Fredrikson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.