Literature DB >> 23380518

Comparison of four self-report measures and a generic mood question to screen for anxiety during pregnancy in English-speaking women.

Stephen Matthey1, Barbara Valenti, Kay Souter, Clodagh Ross-Hamid.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasingly researchers and clinicians have called for perinatal mental health depression screening to be broadened to also screen for significant levels of anxiety. This study therefore aimed to compare the screening performance during pregnancy of four self-report anxiety measures, as well as a generic mood question.
METHOD: The measures tested were two measures of general anxiety (the anxiety subscales of the Edinburgh Depression Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and two measures of pregnancy specific anxiety by Huizink and colleagues, and Rini and colleagues (both originally called the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire). A generic mood question (Matthey Generic Mood Question) asking about stress, anxiety, unhappiness or difficulty coping was also tested. Between 132 and 389 women completed these measures at their first antenatal clinic appointment and up to 249 women completed a diagnostic interview and various measures two weeks later.
RESULTS: The generic mood question performed best, detecting between 58% and 87% of high scorers on the other measures, including 80% of the women with an anxiety disorder. The next best measure was the EDS anxiety subscale, detecting between 26% and 73% of high scorers on the other measures, though this only detected 54% of the women with an anxiety disorder. LIMITATIONS: Findings are only applicable to English-speaking women. In addition whether the findings can be applied to women later in their pregnancy, or postpartum, is not known.
CONCLUSION: Services wishing to screen for not only possible depression but also possible anxiety should use the generic mood question. For those services which currently use the EDS we recommend they also score the three-item anxiety subscale. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23380518     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  13 in total

1.  Using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in the Peripartum.

Authors:  Kristin Voegtline; Jennifer L Payne; Lindsay R Standeven; Bridget Sundel; Meeta Pangtey; Lauren M Osborne
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Patterns of maternal depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms from pregnancy to 5 years postpartum in an Australian cohort experiencing adversity.

Authors:  Hannah Bryson; Susan Perlen; Anna Price; Fiona Mensah; Lisa Gold; Penelope Dakin; Sharon Goldfeld
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.405

3.  Pregnancy related anxiety and general anxious or depressed mood and the choice for birth setting: a secondary data-analysis of the DELIVER study.

Authors:  A B Witteveen; P De Cock; A C Huizink; A De Jonge; T Klomp; M Westerneng; C C Geerts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Patient Health Questionnaire-9 versus Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in screening for major depressive episodes: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Iná S Santos; Beatriz Franck Tavares; Tiago N Munhoz; Patricia Manzolli; Gisele Bartz de Ávila; Eduardo Jannke; Alicia Matijasevich
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-01-21

5.  'right@home': a randomised controlled trial of sustained nurse home visiting from pregnancy to child age 2 years, versus usual care, to improve parent care, parent responsivity and the home learning environment at 2 years.

Authors:  Sharon Goldfeld; Anna Price; Hannah Bryson; Tracey Bruce; Fiona Mensah; Francesca Orsini; Lisa Gold; Harriet Hiscock; Charlene Smith; Lara Bishop; Dianne Jackson; Lynn Kemp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for psychological distress in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lianne M Tomfohr-Madsen; Tavis S Campbell; Gerald F Giesbrecht; Nicole L Letourneau; Linda E Carlson; Joshua W Madsen; Sona Dimidjian
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Psychometric Properties of Parent Outcome Measures Used in RCTs of Antenatal and Early Years Parent Programs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarah L Blower; Nicole Gridley; Abby Dunn; Tracey Bywater; Zoe Hindson; Maria Bryant
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-09

8.  Comparative efficacy of the generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as screening tools for generalized anxiety disorder in pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Authors:  William Simpson; Melanie Glazer; Natalie Michalski; Meir Steiner; Benicio N Frey
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.356

9.  Patient health questionnaire-9 versus Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in screening for major depressive episodes: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Iná S Santos; Beatriz Franck Tavares; Tiago N Munhoz; Patricia Manzolli; Gisele Bartz de Ávila; Eduardo Jannke; Alicia Matijasevich
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-09-27

10.  Study protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial of two models of perinatal integrated psychosocial assessment: the PIPA project.

Authors:  Nicole Reilly; Emma Black; Georgina M Chambers; Virginia Schmied; Stephen Matthey; Josephine Farrell; Dawn Kingston; Andrew Bisits; Marie-Paule Austin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.