| Literature DB >> 23379891 |
Amaresh Chandra1, Radha Jain, Sushil Solomon, Shiksha Shrivastava, Ajoy K Roy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sugarcane is an important cash crop, providing 70% of the global raw sugar as well as raw material for biofuel production. Genetic analysis is hindered in sugarcane because of its large and complex polyploid genome and lack of sufficiently informative gene-tagged markers. Modern genomics has produced large amount of ESTs, which can be exploited to develop molecular markers based on comparative analysis with EST datasets of related crops and whole rice genome sequence, and accentuate their cross-technical functionality in orphan crops like tropical grasses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23379891 PMCID: PMC3598963 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-47
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
List of genotypes belonging to complex, tropical grasses and oat used in the present study
| 29 | IG-HC-1 | MT,MTi,MG | |||||||
| 1 | CoLk8102 | MLM,MS,MRRR | 30 | IG-HC-2 | T,HTi,VGG | ||||
| 2 | CoLk8001 | EM,HS,MRRR | 31 | IG-HC-3 | T,MTi,GG | ||||
| 3 | CoS767 | MLM,HS, FT | 32 | IG-HC-4 | T,MTi,GG | ||||
| 4 | CoLk9606 | MLM,HS,MRRR | 33 | IG-HC-5 | MT,LTi,PG | ||||
| 5 | CoLk9617 | MLM,MS,RRS | 34 | IG97-234 | MT,HTi,,MG | ||||
| 6 | CoS95255 | EM,MS,MRRR | 35 | IG97-24 | MT,MTi,PG | ||||
| 7 | BO91 | MLM,MS,FT | 36 | IG95-30 | MT,HTi,GG | ||||
| 8 | CoJ64 | EM,HS,MRRR | 37 | IG97-192 | MT,MTi,GG | ||||
| 9 | Co1148 | MLM,HS,HTV | 38 | IG97-247 | MT,HTi,MG | ||||
| 10 | CoS97264 | MLM,MS,RRR | 39 | IG97-241 | T,HTi,GG | ||||
| 11 | CoSe92423 | MLM,MS,MRRR | 40 | IG95-25 | MT,LTi,PG | ||||
| 12 | CoLk94184 | EM,HS,FT,MRRR | 41 | IG-SN-1 | T,HTi,VGG | ||||
| 13 | SES34 | VLS,AST,PDR | 42 | IG-SN-2 | T,HTi,GG | ||||
| 14 | Coimbatore | VLS,AST,PDR | 43 | IG-SN-3 | T,LTi,MG | ||||
| 15 | Saretha | EM,MS,TnS,AST | 44 | IG-SN-4 | T,MTi,MG | ||||
| 16 | 28NG210 | EM,HS,TkS,PDS | 45 | IG-SN-5 | VT,VHTi,VGG | ||||
| 17 | Kavenzire | EM,LMS,TnS | 46 | IG-SN-6 | T,LTi,GG | ||||
| 18 | Malani | EM,LMS,TnS | 47 | IG-SN-7 | MT,VHTi,GG | ||||
| 19 | BO138 | MLM,HS,FT,MRRR | 48 | IG-SN-8 | T,HTi,GG | ||||
| | | | 49 | IG-SN-9 | MT,HTi,GG | ||||
| 20 | IG-CF-1 | T,MTi,GG | | ||||||
| 21 | IG-CF-2 | VT,MTi,GG | 50 | JHO 822 | VT,MTi,MFl | ||||
| 22 | IG-CF-3 | T,GTi,MG | 51 | JHO 99-2 | T,HTi,MFl | ||||
| 23 | IG-CF-4 | MT,GTi,MG | 52 | NGB 6370 | MT,HTi,LFl,L | ||||
| 24 | IG-CF-5 | MT,MTi,MG | 53 | JHO 851 | MT,HTi,MG,MFl,L | ||||
| 25 | IG-CF-6 | MT,GTi,GG | 54 | NGB 4871 | MT,GTi,LFl,L | ||||
| 26 | IG-CF-7 | T,GTi,VGG | 55 | NGB 4462 | MT,MTi,LFl,L | ||||
| 27 | IG-CF-8 | MT,MTi,GG | | | | | |||
| 28 | IG-CF-9 | MT,MTi,MG | |||||||
Commercial sugarcane varieties and Saccharum species.
EM = Early maturing; MLM-Mid-late maturing, HS = High sugar; MS = Medium sugar; LMS = Low-medium sugar; VLS = Very low sugar; FT = Flood tolerant; RRR = Red-rot resistant; MRRR = Moderate red-rot resistant; RRS = Red-rot susceptible; AST = Abiotic stress tolerant; TkS = Thick stalk; TnS = Thin stalk; PDS = Pest and disease susceptible; PDR = Pest and disease resistant; HTV = High tillering variety.
Tropical grasses and Oat genotypes.
T = Tall; MT = Medium tall; VT = Very tall; LTI = Low tillering; MTI = Medium tillering; HTI = High tillering; VHTI = Very high tillering; GG = Good growth; MG = Medium growth; VGG = Very good growth; MFl = Medium flowering; LFl = Late flowering; L = Leafy.
Figure 1DNA length polymorphism as observed with CISP markers. PCR products and their length polymorphism of three CISP markers (CISP_SC-31 (A), CISP_SC-39 (B) CISP_SC-276 (C) and CISP_SC-348 (D) on 3% high quality agarose gel among 19 genotypes comprising 13 sugarcane varieties and six Saccharum species (see Table 1 for details). M = 100 bp DNA ladder as molecular marker.
Figure 2UPGMA based dendrogram obtained with 515 bands observed with 185 CISP markers. Dendrogram showing genetic relationships among the clones of Saccharum species, and Indian sugarcane varieties, on the basis of Dice’s similarity coefficient, using 185 conserved-intron scanning primer (CISP) markers. The bootstrap values (≥35) are indicated at nodes.
Figure 3Transferability of CISP markers of sugarcane. Transferability of CISP markers in tropical grasses and Avena sativa genotypes. (A) PCR products (3% high quality agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide) with CISP_SC-01 marker with nine accessions of each of Chrysopogon fulvus (Lanes 1–9) and Sehima nervosum (lanes 10–18), five accessions of Heteropogon contortus (lanes 19–23) and seven accessions of Dichanthium annulatum (lanes 24–30). (B) PCR products with six genotypes of Avena sativa with CISP_SC-05 (lanes 1–6), CISP_SC-13 (lanes 7–12) CISP_SC-19 (lanes 13–18). M = 100 bp DNA ladder as molecular marker.
Figure 4Dendrogram based on DNA sequences. Dendrogram generated based on the DNA sequence homology (ClustalW) of four Saccharum species and five commercial varieties of sugarcane.