Literature DB >> 23379851

A regularization corrected score method for nonlinear regression models with covariate error.

David M Zucker1, Malka Gorfine, Yi Li, Mahlet G Tadesse, Donna Spiegelman.   

Abstract

Many regression analyses involve explanatory variables that are measured with error, and failing to account for this error is well known to lead to biased point and interval estimates of the regression coefficients. We present here a new general method for adjusting for covariate error. Our method consists of an approximate version of the Stefanski-Nakamura corrected score approach, using the method of regularization to obtain an approximate solution of the relevant integral equation. We develop the theory in the setting of classical likelihood models; this setting covers, for example, linear regression, nonlinear regression, logistic regression, and Poisson regression. The method is extremely general in terms of the types of measurement error models covered, and is a functional method in the sense of not involving assumptions on the distribution of the true covariate. We discuss the theoretical properties of the method and present simulation results in the logistic regression setting (univariate and multivariate). For illustration, we apply the method to data from the Harvard Nurses' Health Study concerning the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer mortality in the period following a diagnosis of breast cancer.
Copyright © 2013, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23379851      PMCID: PMC3622191          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01833.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  4 in total

1.  Proportional hazards model with covariates subject to measurement error.

Authors:  T Nakamura
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Corrected score estimation in the proportional hazards model with misclassified discrete covariates.

Authors:  David M Zucker; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Michelle D Holmes; Wendy Y Chen; Diane Feskanich; Candyce H Kroenke; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire.

Authors:  A M Wolf; D J Hunter; G A Colditz; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; K A Corsano; B Rosner; A Kriska; W C Willett
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.196

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  The role of matching when adjusting for baseline differences in the outcome variable of comparative effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Carlos G Grijalva; Christianne L Roumie; Harvey J Murff; Adriana M Hung; Cole Beck; Xulei Liu; Marie R Griffin; Robert A Greevy
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.744

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.