| Literature DB >> 23378730 |
Haotian Lin1, Lixia Luo, Shiqi Ling, Wan Chen, Zhaochuan Liu, Xiaojian Zhong, Changrui Wu, Weirong Chen, Yizhi Liu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate whether lymphatic microvessel density (LMVD) could be used as a predictive marker for the recurrence time of pterygia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23378730 PMCID: PMC3559093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Figure 1Slit-lamp photos of different grades of pterygium and results of lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 immunohistochemistry for the three grades of pterygia: A and D: Grade 1; B and E: Grade 2; C and E: Grade 3. Microvessels were dramatically increased in Grades 2 and 3 pterygia. Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1) was positive for lymphatic vessels but negative for blood vessels. Red arrows point to lymphatic vessels and blue arrows, blood vessels (original magnification=100X).
Characteristics of patients with pterygium in the study.
| Grades of pterygium | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients (eyes) | 32 | 29 | 35 |
| Age (years) | 54.2±6.43 | 57.8±5.21* | 56.3±5.92*+ |
| Female/Male | 18/14 | 16/13 | 20/15 |
| Extension of pterygium (mm) | 1.71±0.22 | 2.12±0.14 # | 3.05±0.53 # & |
| Width of pterygium (mm) | 3.82±0.34 | 3.99±0.57* | 4.13±0.55 # & |
| Area of pterygium (mm2) | 6.90±1.13 | 7.28±1.54* | 9.92±1.95 # & |
Compared with grade 1, * p>0.05; # p<0.05; Compared with grade 2, &p<0.05, +p>0.05
Figure 2Study protocol, definition of recurrence time, and follow-up results.
LMVD and BMVD identified in pterygium and control conjunctiva tissue.
| Grades of pterygium | Number of cases | LMVD | BMVD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 32 | 12.75±8.97* | 19.66±5.15 |
| Grade 2 | 29 | 15.1±7.43 * | 36.52±9.12* |
| Grade 3 | 35 | 27.29±8.45 * | 29.31±9.27 * |
| Normal conjunctiva | 10 | 7.7±4.47 | 18.6±4.22 |
LMVD=Lymphatic Micro-Vessel Density; BMVD=Blood Micro-Vessel Density; Compared with normal conjunctiva, * p<0.05.
Figure 3Histogram of number of recurrent cases and their recurrence time. The bimodal distribution of recurrence time (RT) indicated that 12 months and 30 months after primary pterygium resection were two risk times for pterygium recurrence, which might involve different underlying mechanisms.
Figure 4The relationship between lymphatic microvessel density, blood microvessel density, and recurrence time in different recurrent cases. A: Scatter distribution of recurrence time (RT) in different grades of pterygium was with best fit lines for lymphatic microvessel density (LMVD) in each grade. B: Scatter distribution of RT in all cases was with a fit line for total LMVD. C: Scatter distribution of RT in different grades of pterygium was with best fit lines for blood microvessel density (BMVD) in each grade, but the fit line for total BMVD did not exist.