Literature DB >> 23377661

A phase I dose-escalation study of intravenous panobinostat in patients with lymphoma and solid tumors.

Sunil Sharma1, Joachim Beck, Monica Mita, Sofia Paul, Margaret M Woo, Margaret Squier, Brian Gadbaw, H Miles Prince.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Panobinostat, a pan-deacetylase inhibitor, is a promising anti-cancer agent that increases acetylation of proteins associated with growth and survival pathways of malignant cells. The primary objective of this phase I dose-escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous (i.v.) panobinostat administered on different dosing schedules in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Secondary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetic profiles, and activities of the i.v. formulation.
METHODS: i.v. panobinostat was administered at escalating doses on a daily (days 1-3 and 8-10 of a 21-day cycle; days 1-3 and 15-17 of a 28-day cycle) or weekly (days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle; days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) schedule, and safety and tolerability were monitored. Serial blood samples were collected following dosing for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses.
RESULTS: The MTD for the daily administration schedule was 7.2 g/m(2), whereas the MTD for the weekly schedule was 20.0 mg/m(2). In addition to fatigue and cardiac arrhythmias, including prolonged QTcF, DLTs associated with the study drug were principally due to myelosuppressive effects. Maximum concentrations and bioavailability of i.v. panobinostat increased dose-proportionally across all doses evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study and others, the i.v. formulation of panobinostat was well tolerated in many patients, but concerns remain regarding its potential suitability outside the study setting due to potential electrocardiogram abnormalities. Therefore, further development will focus on the panobinostat oral formulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23377661     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-013-9930-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  34 in total

Review 1.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group.

Authors:  B D Cheson; S J Horning; B Coiffier; M A Shipp; R I Fisher; J M Connors; T A Lister; J Vose; A Grillo-López; A Hagenbeek; F Cabanillas; D Klippensten; W Hiddemann; R Castellino; N L Harris; J O Armitage; W Carter; R Hoppe; G P Canellos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Dynamic nucleosomes.

Authors:  Karolin Luger
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors and the promise of epigenetic (and more) treatments for cancer.

Authors:  Saverio Minucci; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  A phase I study of intravenous LBH589, a novel cinnamic hydroxamic acid analogue histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Francis Giles; Thomas Fischer; Jorge Cortes; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Joachim Beck; Farhad Ravandi; Eric Masson; Patricia Rae; Glen Laird; Sunil Sharma; Hagop Kantarjian; Margaret Dugan; Maher Albitar; Kapil Bhalla
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  The histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 is a potent antimyeloma agent that overcomes drug resistance.

Authors:  Patricia Maiso; Xonia Carvajal-Vergara; Enrique M Ocio; Ricardo López-Pérez; Gema Mateo; Norma Gutiérrez; Peter Atadja; Atanasio Pandiella; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Phase IIb multicenter trial of vorinostat in patients with persistent, progressive, or treatment refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Elise A Olsen; Youn H Kim; Timothy M Kuzel; Theresa R Pacheco; Francine M Foss; Sareeta Parker; Stanley R Frankel; Cong Chen; Justin L Ricker; Jean Marie Arduino; Madeleine Duvic
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The cytoplasmic deacetylase HDAC6 is required for efficient oncogenic tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Lee; Kian-Huat Lim; Xing Guo; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Yasheng Gao; Tomasa Barrientos; Peter Ordentlich; Xiao-Fan Wang; Christopher M Counter; Tso-Pang Yao
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Joint British Association of Dermatologists and U.K. Cutaneous Lymphoma Group guidelines for the management of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  S J Whittaker; J R Marsden; M Spittle; R Russell Jones
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  Role of acetylation and extracellular location of heat shock protein 90alpha in tumor cell invasion.

Authors:  Yonghua Yang; Rehka Rao; Jie Shen; Yun Tang; Warren Fiskus; John Nechtman; Peter Atadja; Kapil Bhalla
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Role of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Focus on Vorinostat and Panobinostat.

Authors:  Salma Afifi; Angela Michael; Mahshid Azimi; Mabel Rodriguez; Nikoletta Lendvai; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 2.  Panobinostat: first global approval.

Authors:  Karly P Garnock-Jones
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Panobinostat.

Authors:  Mathilde Van Veggel; Elsbeth Westerman; Paul Hamberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  The potential of panobinostat as a treatment option in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Claudia V Andreu-Vieyra; James R Berenson
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2014-12

6.  Phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jesus G Berdeja; Lowell L Hart; Joseph R Mace; Edward R Arrowsmith; James H Essell; Rami S Owera; John D Hainsworth; Ian W Flinn
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  Practical guidance for new multiple myeloma treatment regimens: A nursing perspective.

Authors:  Monica Epstein; Candis Morrison
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.385

8.  Functional and Transcriptional Characterization of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor-Mediated Cardiac Adverse Effects in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Ivan Kopljar; David J Gallacher; An De Bondt; Laure Cougnaud; Eddy Vlaminckx; Ilse Van den Wyngaert; Hua Rong Lu
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Chronic drug-induced effects on contractile motion properties and cardiac biomarkers in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Ivan Kopljar; An De Bondt; Petra Vinken; Ard Teisman; Bruce Damiano; Nick Goeminne; Ilse Van den Wyngaert; David J Gallacher; Hua Rong Lu
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral panobinostat in patients with hematologic and solid tumors.

Authors:  Marina Savelieva; Margaret M Woo; Horst Schran; Song Mu; Jerry Nedelman; Renaud Capdeville
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.