PURPOSE: Knowledge of the genetic backgrounds of hereditary syndromes, which are increasingly being characterized, enables genetic screening of family members of affected patients. Upon detection of a mutation, genetic counselling and clinical screening including imaging modalities and biochemical analyses are commonly performed. METHODS: Unaffected, mutation-positive relatives of index patients with hereditary paraganglioma syndromes were offered PET imaging with [(18)F]fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine and the incidence of pathological findings was retrospectively analysed in relation to mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase enzyme complex. PET only or PET/CT was performed in 21 individuals from eight families with SDHD, one family with SDHC and two families with SDHB mutations. Screening was offered every 2 to 5 years. RESULTS: Of the 21 individuals, 14 showed paraganglioma during screening. In particular, in only 2 of 15 patients with a SDHD mutation were the findings completely unremarkable on PET screening. However, false-negative lesions for abdominal manifestations in two SDHD-positive patients were detected. CONCLUSION: FDOPA PET is a sensitive imaging modality which should be offered to patients with a detected SDHx (SDHD) mutation, preferably using a hybrid technique.
PURPOSE: Knowledge of the genetic backgrounds of hereditary syndromes, which are increasingly being characterized, enables genetic screening of family members of affected patients. Upon detection of a mutation, genetic counselling and clinical screening including imaging modalities and biochemical analyses are commonly performed. METHODS: Unaffected, mutation-positive relatives of index patients with hereditary paraganglioma syndromes were offered PET imaging with [(18)F]fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine and the incidence of pathological findings was retrospectively analysed in relation to mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase enzyme complex. PET only or PET/CT was performed in 21 individuals from eight families with SDHD, one family with SDHC and two families with SDHB mutations. Screening was offered every 2 to 5 years. RESULTS: Of the 21 individuals, 14 showed paraganglioma during screening. In particular, in only 2 of 15 patients with a SDHD mutation were the findings completely unremarkable on PET screening. However, false-negative lesions for abdominal manifestations in two SDHD-positive patients were detected. CONCLUSION: FDOPA PET is a sensitive imaging modality which should be offered to patients with a detected SDHx (SDHD) mutation, preferably using a hybrid technique.
Authors: Kathryn S King; Clara C Chen; Dimitrios K Alexopoulos; Millie A Whatley; James C Reynolds; Nicholas Patronas; Alexander Ling; Karen T Adams; Paraskevi Xekouki; Howard Lando; Constantine A Stratakis; Karel Pacak Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: N van Duinen; D Steenvoorden; B A Bonsing; J Vuyk; A H J T Vriends; J C Jansen; J A Romijn; E P M Corssmit Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2010-04-30 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: C Fottner; A Helisch; M Anlauf; H Rossmann; T J Musholt; A Kreft; S Schadmand-Fischer; P Bartenstein; K J Lackner; G Klöppel; M Schreckenberger; M M Weber Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Konstantinos Papaspyrou; Torsten Mewes; Heidi Rossmann; Christian Fottner; Brigitte Schneider-Raetzke; Oliver Bartsch; Mathias Schreckenberger; Karl J Lackner; Ronald G Amedee; Wolf J Mann Journal: Head Neck Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: H Christian Rischke; Matthias R Benz; Damian Wild; Michael Mix; Rebecca A Dumont; Dean Campbell; Jochen Seufert; Thorsten Wiech; Jochen Rössler; Wolfgang A Weber; Hartmut P H Neumann Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: David Taïeb; Henri J Timmers; Elif Hindié; Benjamin A Guillet; Hartmut P Neumann; Martin K Walz; Giuseppe Opocher; Wouter W de Herder; Carsten C Boedeker; Ronald R de Krijger; Arturo Chiti; Adil Al-Nahhas; Karel Pacak; Domenico Rubello Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: David Taïeb; Alexandre Kaliski; Carsten C Boedeker; Victoria Martucci; Tito Fojo; John R Adler; Karel Pacak Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Victoria L Martucci; Abbas Emaminia; Jaydira del Rivero; Ronald M Lechan; Bindiya T Magoon; Analyza Galia; Tito Fojo; Steve Leung; Roberto Lorusso; Camilo Jimenez; Barry L Shulkin; Jennifer L Audibert; Karen T Adams; Douglas R Rosing; Anand Vaidya; Robert G Dluhy; Keith A Horvath; Karel Pacak Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Laurence Amar; Karel Pacak; Olivier Steichen; Scott A Akker; Simon J B Aylwin; Eric Baudin; Alexandre Buffet; Nelly Burnichon; Roderick J Clifton-Bligh; Patricia L M Dahia; Martin Fassnacht; Ashley B Grossman; Philippe Herman; Rodney J Hicks; Andrzej Januszewicz; Camilo Jimenez; Henricus P M Kunst; Dylan Lewis; Massimo Mannelli; Mitsuhide Naruse; Mercedes Robledo; David Taïeb; David R Taylor; Henri J L M Timmers; Giorgio Treglia; Nicola Tufton; William F Young; Jacques W M Lenders; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Charlotte Lussey-Lepoutre Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 43.330