CONTEXT: Sporadic pheochromocytomas are detected by clinical signs and symptoms, whereas pheochromocytomas in patients with a known hereditary predisposition for these tumors are detected by repetitive screening for catecholamine excess. OBJECTIVE: To document the clinical, biochemical, and pathological differences between patients with sporadic pheochromocytomas, detected by signs and symptoms and patients with pheochromocytomas, detected by biochemical screening in established hereditary syndromes. DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with pheochromocytoma (pheochromocytomas detected by signs and symptoms: n=28 and pheochromocytomas detected by screening: n=32) in our center. RESULTS: Patients with pheochromocytomas detected by screening presented with less complaints of diaphoresis (P<0.01), palpitations (P=0.01), paleness (P=0.01), nausea (P<0.01), and vomiting (P=0.01) compared with patients with symptomatic pheochromocytomas. Patients with pheochromocytomas detected by screening tended to be younger at the time of diagnosis (41+/-2 vs 47+/-3 years, P=0.07). In addition, patients with pheochromocytomas detected by screening had significantly lower rates of 24-h urinary catecholamine excretion, and considerably smaller tumors (3.7+/-0.5 vs 7.3+/-0.7 cm, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pheochromocytomas detected by screening of patients with a hereditary predisposition have a much lower prevalence of signs and symptoms, lower catecholamine excess, and smaller tumors, compared with sporadic pheochromocytomas, detected by signs and symptoms. These data support the benefits of screening for pheochromocytomas in patients with hereditary syndromes predisposing for these tumors.
CONTEXT: Sporadic pheochromocytomas are detected by clinical signs and symptoms, whereas pheochromocytomas in patients with a known hereditary predisposition for these tumors are detected by repetitive screening for catecholamine excess. OBJECTIVE: To document the clinical, biochemical, and pathological differences between patients with sporadic pheochromocytomas, detected by signs and symptoms and patients with pheochromocytomas, detected by biochemical screening in established hereditary syndromes. DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with pheochromocytoma (pheochromocytomas detected by signs and symptoms: n=28 and pheochromocytomas detected by screening: n=32) in our center. RESULTS:Patients with pheochromocytomas detected by screening presented with less complaints of diaphoresis (P<0.01), palpitations (P=0.01), paleness (P=0.01), nausea (P<0.01), and vomiting (P=0.01) compared with patients with symptomatic pheochromocytomas. Patients with pheochromocytomas detected by screening tended to be younger at the time of diagnosis (41+/-2 vs 47+/-3 years, P=0.07). In addition, patients with pheochromocytomas detected by screening had significantly lower rates of 24-h urinary catecholamine excretion, and considerably smaller tumors (3.7+/-0.5 vs 7.3+/-0.7 cm, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Pheochromocytomas detected by screening of patients with a hereditary predisposition have a much lower prevalence of signs and symptoms, lower catecholamine excess, and smaller tumors, compared with sporadic pheochromocytomas, detected by signs and symptoms. These data support the benefits of screening for pheochromocytomas in patients with hereditary syndromes predisposing for these tumors.
Authors: Leonie T van Hulsteijn; Berdine Heesterman; Jeroen C Jansen; Jean-Pierre Bayley; Frederik J Hes; Eleonora P M Corssmit; Olaf M Dekkers Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Matthias Miederer; Christian Fottner; Heidi Rossmann; Andreas Helisch; Konstantinos Papaspyrou; Oliver Bartsch; Wolf J Mann; Thomas J Musholt; Matthias M Weber; Karl J Lackner; Mathias Schreckenberger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-02-02 Impact factor: 9.236