Literature DB >> 23377011

Effect of probe contact pressure on the photoplethysmographic assessment of conduit artery stiffness.

Andris Grabovskis1, Zbignevs Marcinkevics, Uldis Rubins, Edgars Kviesis-Kipge.   

Abstract

Currently, photoplethysmography (PPG) is a frequently studied optical blood pulsation detection technique among biophotonic and biomedical researchers due to the fact that it shows high potential for estimating the arterial stiffness (AS). The extraction of diagnostically useful information requires standardized measurement procedure with good repeatability. However, the effects of a crucially important factor-the optimal contact pressure (CP) of the probe-are often ignored. Also, CP values are not reported to evaluate those effects. It is hypothesized that AS estimated from PPG pulse wave 2nd derivative parameter b/a is strongly inconsistent when recorded at nonoptimal probe CP. Our pilot study confirmed this during in vivo PPG recordings from conduit artery sites on five healthy subjects at variable probe CP (0 to 15 kPa) by using 880 nm reflectance type sensor, force transducer, and PPG alternating current (AC) signal pulse area derived optimal CP criterion. The b/a values, calculated from PPG with variable CP, showed variation >300 percent. In contrast, at the optimal CP, the b/a showed high repeatability (coefficient of variability <5 percent). The effect has been explained with exponential pulse pressure-volume relationship model which indicates the optimal CP range.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23377011     DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.2.027004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  10 in total

1.  Study of Artifact-Resistive Technology Based on a Novel Dual Photoplethysmography Method for Wearable Pulse Rate Monitors.

Authors:  Congcong Zhou; Jingjie Feng; Jun Hu; Xuesong Ye
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Photoplethysmography Revisited: From Contact to Noncontact, From Point to Imaging.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Nitish Thakor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Establishing best practices in photoplethysmography signal acquisition and processing.

Authors:  Peter H Charlton; Kristjan Pilt; Panicos A Kyriacou
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  Quantitative Comparison of the Performance of Piezoresistive, Piezoelectric, Acceleration, and Optical Pulse Wave Sensors.

Authors:  Hongju Wang; Lu Wang; Nannan Sun; Yang Yao; Liling Hao; Lisheng Xu; Stephen E Greenwald
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Sources of Inaccuracy in Photoplethysmography for Continuous Cardiovascular Monitoring.

Authors:  Jesse Fine; Kimberly L Branan; Andres J Rodriguez; Tananant Boonya-Ananta; Jessica C Ramella-Roman; Michael J McShane; Gerard L Coté
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16

6.  Effects of Contact Pressure in Reflectance Photoplethysmography in an In Vitro Tissue-Vessel Phantom.

Authors:  James M May; Elisa Mejía-Mejía; Michelle Nomoni; Karthik Budidha; Changmok Choi; Panicos A Kyriacou
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Monte Carlo method for assessment of a multimodal insertable biosensor.

Authors:  Jesse Fine; Michael J McShane; Gerard L Coté
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.758

8.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy accurately quantifies various degrees of liver steatosis in murine models of fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Andrie C Westerkamp; Vishnu V Pully; Golnar Karimian; Fernanda Bomfati; Zwanida J Veldhuis; Janneke Wiersema-Buist; Benno H W Hendriks; Ton Lisman; Robert J Porte
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  A new, short-recorded photoplethysmogram dataset for blood pressure monitoring in China.

Authors:  Yongbo Liang; Zhencheng Chen; Guiyong Liu; Mohamed Elgendi
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  A Study on the Effect of Contact Pressure during Physical Activity on Photoplethysmographic Heart Rate Measurements.

Authors:  Francesco Scardulla; Leonardo D'Acquisto; Raffaele Colombarini; Sijung Hu; Salvatore Pasta; Diego Bellavia
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.