BACKGROUND: Soluble oligomers of amyloid ß-protein (Aß) have been increasingly linked to synaptic dysfunction, tau alteration, and neuritic dystrophy in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mouse models. There is a great need for assays that quantify Aß oligomers with high specificity and sensitivity. METHODS: We designed and validated two oligomer-specific (o-) enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs) using either an Aß aggregate-selective monoclonal for capture and a monoclonal to the free N-terminus for detection, or the latter antibody for both capture and detection. RESULTS: The o-ELISAs specifically quantified pure oligomers of synthetic Aß with sizes from dimers up to much larger assemblies and over a wide dynamic range of concentrations, whereas Aß monomers were undetectable. Natural Aß oligomers of similarly wide size and concentration ranges were measured in extracts of AD and control brains, revealing >1000-fold higher concentrations of Aß oligomers than monomers in the soluble fraction of AD cortex. The assays quantified the age-related rise in oligomers in hAPP transgenic mice. Unexpectedly, none of 90 human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples gave a specific signal in either o-ELISA. CONCLUSIONS: These new o-ELISAs with rigorously confirmed specificity can quantify oligomer burden in human and mouse brains for diagnostic and mechanistic studies and for AD biomarker development. However, our data raise the likelihood that the hydrophobicity of Aß oligomers makes them very low in number or absent in aqueous CSF.
BACKGROUND: Soluble oligomers of amyloid ß-protein (Aß) have been increasingly linked to synaptic dysfunction, tau alteration, and neuritic dystrophy in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mouse models. There is a great need for assays that quantify Aß oligomers with high specificity and sensitivity. METHODS: We designed and validated two oligomer-specific (o-) enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs) using either an Aß aggregate-selective monoclonal for capture and a monoclonal to the free N-terminus for detection, or the latter antibody for both capture and detection. RESULTS: The o-ELISAs specifically quantified pure oligomers of synthetic Aß with sizes from dimers up to much larger assemblies and over a wide dynamic range of concentrations, whereas Aß monomers were undetectable. Natural Aß oligomers of similarly wide size and concentration ranges were measured in extracts of AD and control brains, revealing >1000-fold higher concentrations of Aß oligomers than monomers in the soluble fraction of AD cortex. The assays quantified the age-related rise in oligomers in hAPPtransgenic mice. Unexpectedly, none of 90 human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples gave a specific signal in either o-ELISA. CONCLUSIONS: These new o-ELISAs with rigorously confirmed specificity can quantify oligomer burden in human and mouse brains for diagnostic and mechanistic studies and for AD biomarker development. However, our data raise the likelihood that the hydrophobicity of Aß oligomers makes them very low in number or absent in aqueous CSF.
Authors: D R Howlett; A E Perry; F Godfrey; J E Swatton; K H Jennings; C Spitzfaden; H Wadsworth; S J Wood; R E Markwell Journal: Biochem J Date: 1999-05-15 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Rakez Kayed; Elizabeth Head; Jennifer L Thompson; Theresa M McIntire; Saskia C Milton; Carl W Cotman; Charles G Glabe Journal: Science Date: 2003-04-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Dominic M Walsh; Matthew Townsend; Marcia B Podlisny; Ganesh M Shankar; Julia V Fadeeva; Omar El Agnaf; Dean M Hartley; Dennis J Selkoe Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: K Johnson-Wood; M Lee; R Motter; K Hu; G Gordon; R Barbour; K Khan; M Gordon; H Tan; D Games; I Lieberburg; D Schenk; P Seubert; L McConlogue Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-02-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L F Lue; Y M Kuo; A E Roher; L Brachova; Y Shen; L Sue; T Beach; J H Kurth; R E Rydel; J Rogers Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Dimitra G Georganopoulou; Lei Chang; Jwa-Min Nam; C Shad Thaxton; Elliott J Mufson; William L Klein; Chad A Mirkin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-02-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yuesong Gong; Lei Chang; Kirsten L Viola; Pascale N Lacor; Mary P Lambert; Caleb E Finch; Grant A Krafft; William L Klein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-08-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: N Ida; T Hartmann; J Pantel; J Schröder; R Zerfass; H Förstl; R Sandbrink; C L Masters; K Beyreuther Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1996-09-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Ming-Hsuan Ou-Yang; Feng Xu; Mei-Chen Liao; Judianne Davis; John K Robinson; William E Van Nostrand Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Jessica M Mc Donald; Tiernan T O'Malley; Wen Liu; Alexandra J Mably; Gunnar Brinkmalm; Erik Portelius; William M Wittbold; Matthew P Frosch; Dominic M Walsh Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Alexandra J Mably; Wen Liu; Jessica M Mc Donald; Jean-Cosme Dodart; Frédérique Bard; Cynthia A Lemere; Brian O'Nuallain; Dominic M Walsh Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Yinghua Guan; Kevin J Cao; Adam Cantlon; Kristyna Elbel; Emmanuel A Theodorakis; Dominic M Walsh; Jerry Yang; Jagesh V Shah Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 4.418