| Literature DB >> 23375077 |
Gouri Sankar Bhunia1, Shreekant Kesari, Nandini Chatterjee, Vijay Kumar, Pradeep Das.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An improved understanding in transmission variation of kala-azar is fundamental to conduct surveillance and implementing disease prevention strategies. This study investigated the spatio-temporal patterns and hotspot detection for reporting kala-azar cases in Vaishali district based on spatial statistical analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23375077 PMCID: PMC3577657 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-64
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Location map of the study area.
Figure 2Map showing the average annual incidence rate of kala-azar from the period of 2007–2011.
Figure 3Maps showing the inverse distance weighting interpolation incidence rates of kala-azar disease over different years.
Spatial autocorrelation estimation of different years using Moran’s Index
| 2007 | 0.165280 | −0.00057 | 0.00020 | 11.6496 | <0.01 | Clustered |
| 2008 | 0.099660 | −0.00057 | 0.000199 | 7.100282 | <0.01 | Clustered |
| 2009 | 0.070901 | −0.000575 | 0.000196 | 5.101377 | <0.01 | Clustered |
| 2010 | 0.044744 | −0.000575 | 0.000045 | 4.120251 | <0.01 | Clustered |
| 2011 | 0.057347 | −0.000575 | 0.000198 | 6.677457 | <0.01 | Clustered |
Analysis of high/low clustering for different years using Getis-Ord Gi* statistic
| 2007 | 0.00963 | 0.00320 | 0.000017 | 12.2138 | <0.01 |
| 2008 | 0.00554 | 0.00320 | 0.000002 | 7.3240 | <0.01 |
| 2009 | 0.00512 | 0.00320 | 0.000003 | 5.2544 | <0.01 |
| 2010 | 0.00422 | 0.00320 | 0.000002 | 3.3341 | <0.01 |
| 2011 | 0.00523 | 0.00320 | 0.000004 | 4.846 | <0.01 |
Cluster and outlier analysis for kala-azar disease in Vaishali district, 2007–2011
| | No. of villages | LMiIndex | LMiZScore | No. of villages | LMiIndex | LMiZScore | No. of villages | LMiIndex | LMiZScore | No. of villages | LMiIndex | LMiZScore | ||||
| 2007 | 63 | 28.25 | 11.92 | 0.003 | 11 | −6.91 | −2.64 | <0.01 | 8 | −5.34 | −2.52 | 0.02 | - | - | - | - |
| 2008 | 73 | 11.83 | 5.00 | <0.01 | 4 | −7.47 | −2.77 | 0.01 | 8 | −5.21 | −2.39 | 0.02 | - | - | - | - |
| 2009 | 49 | 13.72 | 6.01 | 0.009 | 5 | −10.22 | −4.12 | 0.009 | 4 | −6.04 | −2.54 | 0.019 | - | - | - | - |
| 2010 | 45 | 10.61 | 4.70 | 0.006 | 18 | −8.50 | −3.51 | 0.013 | 5 | −5.95 | −2.45 | 0.018 | - | - | - | - |
| 2011 | 38 | 16.37 | 7.04 | 0.004 | 10 | −7.49 | −3.03 | 0.014 | 4 | −4.82 | −2.26 | 0.026 | - | - | - | - |
| 2007-2011 | 67 | 58.00 | 9.11 | 0.008 | 17 | −21.03 | −3.28 | 0.014 | 22 | −17.39 | −2.44 | 0.021 | - | - | - | - |
Note: High-High: Cluster of high values; High-Low: outlier in which a high value is surrounding primarily by low values; Low-High: outlier in which a low value is surrounded primarily by high values; Low-Low: cluster of low values.
Figure 4Maps showing the hotspot and cold spot over different years (2007–2011) in Vaishali district.