Literature DB >> 9230778

Breast cancer clusters in the northeast United States: a geographic analysis.

M Kulldorff1, E J Feuer, B A Miller, L S Freedman.   

Abstract

High breast cancer mortality rates have been reported in the northeastern part of the United States, with recent attention focused on Long Island, New York. In this study, the authors investigate whether the high breast cancer mortality is evenly spread over the Northeast, in the sense that any observed clusters of deaths can be explained by chance alone, or whether there are clusters of statistical significance. Demographic data and age-specific breast cancer mortality rates for women were obtained for all 244 counties in 11 northeastern states and for the District of Columbia for 1988-1992. A recently developed spatial scan statistic is used, which searches for clusters of cases without specifying their size or location ahead of time, and which tests for their statistical significance while adjusting for the multiple testing inherent in such a procedure. The basic analysis is adjusted for age, with further analyses examining how the results are affected by incorporating race, urbanicity, and parity as confounding variables. There is a statistically significant and geographically broad cluster of breast cancer deaths in the New York City-Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, metropolitan area (p = 0.0001), which has a 7.4% higher mortality rate than the rest of the Northeast. The cluster remains significant when race, urbanicity, and/or parity are included as confounding variables. Four smaller subclusters within this area are also significant on their own strength: Philadelphia with suburbs (p = 0.0001), Long Island (p = 0.0001), central New Jersey (p = 0.0001), and northeastern New Jersey (p = 0.0001). The elevated breast cancer mortality on Long Island might be viewed less as a unique local phenomenon and more as part of a more general situation involving large parts of the New York City-Philadelphia metropolitan area. The several known and hypothesized risk factors for which we could not adjust and that may explain the detected cluster are most notably age at first birth, age at menarche, age at menopause, breastfeeding, genetic mutations, and environmental factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9230778     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  128 in total

1.  Geographic information systems and pharmacoepidemiology: using spatial cluster detection to monitor local patterns of prescription opioid abuse.

Authors:  John S Brownstein; Traci C Green; Theresa A Cassidy; Stephen F Butler
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Geographic analysis of forest health indicators using spatial scan statistics.

Authors:  John W Coulston; Kurt H Riitters
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Cluster morphology analysis.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

4.  Spatial clusters of cancer incidence: analyzing 1940 census data linked to 1966-2017 cancer records.

Authors:  Claire L Leiser; Marissa Taddie; Rachael Hemmert; Rebecca Richards Steed; James A VanDerslice; Kevin Henry; Jacob Ambrose; Brock O'Neil; Ken R Smith; Heidi A Hanson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Does young adult suicide cluster geographically in Scotland?

Authors:  Daniel J Exeter; Paul J Boyle
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  A spatial analysis of mental retardation of unknown cause and maternal residence during pregnancy.

Authors:  Huiling Zhen; Andrew B Lawson; Suzanne McDermott; Archana Pande Lamichhane; Marjorie Aelion
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.212

7.  Geographic variations in female breast cancer incidence in relation to ambient air emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Courtney Large; Yudan Wei
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Health geography: supporting public health policy and planning.

Authors:  Trevor J B Dummer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Spatial clustering of HIV prevalence in Atlanta, Georgia and population characteristics associated with case concentrations.

Authors:  Brooke A Hixson; Saad B Omer; Carlos del Rio; Paula M Frew
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.671

10.  Distance to Anopheles sundaicus larval habitats dominant among risk factors for parasitemia in meso-endemic Southwest Sumba, Indonesia.

Authors:  Christian P Nixon; Christina E Nixon; Dian Sidik Arsyad; Krisin Chand; Frilasita A Yudhaputri; Wajiyo Sumarto; Suradi Wangsamuda; Puji B Asih; Sylvia S Marantina; Isra Wahid; Gang Han; Jennifer F Friedman; Michael J Bangs; Din Syafruddin; J Kevin Baird
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.