| Literature DB >> 23374982 |
Oliver Tills1, Tabitha Bitterli, Phil Culverhouse, John I Spicer, Simon Rundle.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Motion analysis is one of the tools available to biologists to extract biologically relevant information from image datasets and has been applied to a diverse range of organisms. The application of motion analysis during early development presents a challenge, as embryos often exhibit complex, subtle and diverse movement patterns. A method of motion analysis able to holistically quantify complex embryonic movements could be a powerful tool for fields such as toxicology and developmental biology to investigate whole organism stress responses. Here we assessed whether motion analysis could be used to distinguish the effects of stressors on three early developmental stages of each of three species: (i) the zebrafish Danio rerio (stages 19 h, 21.5 h and 33 h exposed to 1.5% ethanol and a salinity of 5); (ii) the African clawed toad Xenopus laevis (stages 24, 32 and 34 exposed to a salinity of 20); and iii) the pond snail Radix balthica (stages E3, E4, E6, E9 and E11 exposed to salinities of 5, 10 and 15). Image sequences were analysed using Sparse Optic Flow and the resultant frame-to-frame motion parameters were analysed using Discrete Fourier Transform to quantify the distribution of energy at different frequencies. This spectral frequency dataset was then used to construct a Bray-Curtis similarity matrix and differences in movement patterns between embryos in this matrix were tested for using ANOSIM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23374982 PMCID: PMC3573997 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Bioinformatics ISSN: 1471-2105 Impact factor: 3.169
Figure 1Optic flow of an E6 stage embryo showing angular rotations (red and yellow) and centre of mass (blue line).
Figure 2Frame by frame optic flow parameters of control and treatment embryos for each of the developmental stages of , and . Red – positive angle movements, blue – negative angle movements, green – X coordinate of centre of mass, yellow – Y coordinate of centre of mass. A time period (Danio rerio – 10 min, Xenopus laevis – 10 min, Radix balthica – 5 min) of a single embryo is shown, exhibiting typical movement patterns for each treatment response per developmental stage.
Figure 3Multidimensional scaling plots in two dimensions using Bray-Curtis similarity matrices. MDS plots using Bray-Curtis similarity matrices performed on logarithmically transformed spectral frequency data produced using Discrete Fourier Transform analysis of (i) negative angle (ii) positive angle (iii) centre of mass – rho and (iv) centre of mass – theta, frame-to-frame parameters for (a) Danio rerio, (b) Xenopus laevis and (c) Radix balthica under different environmental conditions and at different developmental stages. Bubble size represents the amount of tail flicks of Danio rerio and Xenopus laevis, the number of rotations of Radix balthica at stages E3, E4 and E6, and the number of complete gliding along the circumference of the egg capsule on stages E9 and E11.
Comparison of analysis of treatment groups by both the automated motion analysis technique and observer quantification
| | | ||||||
| | | | |||||
| | ns | ns | | | | | |
| | ns | ns | ns | ns | | | |
| | ns | ns | | | | | |
| * | * | ns | ns | | | ||
| | ns | ns | | | | | |
| * | ns | *** | ** | | | ||
| | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | ||
| | *** | * | | | | | |
| | *** | ns | | | | | |
| | *** | ns | | | | | |
| | | ||||||
| | * | ns | | | | | |
| | ** | *** | ns | ns | | | |
| | ** | *** | ** | * | ** | * | |
| | * | * | | | | | |
| | ** | *** | ** | ns | | | |
| | ** | *** | ** | *** | * | * | |
| | ** | *** | | | | | |
| | ** | *** | ns | ns | | | |
| | ** | *** | ** | ns | ** | ns | |
| | ns | ns | | | | | |
| | ** | * | * | ns | | | |
| | ** | * | ** | ns | * | ns | |
| | * | ns | | | | | |
| | ** | * | * | ns | | | |
| ** | *** | ** | * | ** | * | ||
ANOSIM of Bray-Curtis similarity matrices calculated from the results of Discrete Fourier Transform on frame-to-frame motion parameters. Manual quantification of movement patterns: number of tail flicks for Danio rerio (19 hpf - F17 = 1.23, P = 0.321; 21.5 hpf - F17 = 4.70, P = 0.026; 33 hpf - F17 = 11.83, P = 0.001) and Xenopus laevis (St. 24 – F11 = 8.98, P = 0.013; St. 32 – F11 = 3.38, P = 0.096; St. 34 – F11 = 3.16, P = 0.106) and number of embryo rotations for Radix balthica (E3 – F23 = 9.36, P = ≤ 0.001; E4 – F23 = 26.33, P = ≤ 0.001; E6 – F23 = 58.25, P = ≤ 0.001; E9 – F23 = 8.40, P = 0.001; E11 – F23 = 7.88, P = 0.001); ANOVA between treatment groups to tests for differences in the manual quantification of embryonic movement for (a) Danio rerio, (b) Xenopus laevis and (c) Radix balthica. *** - p ≤ 0.001, ** - p ≤ 0.01, * - p ≤ 0.05, ns – not significant.
Significance levels, calculated using ANOSIM, of pairwise differences in developmental stages
| 19 h | ** | | ||
| 33 h | ** | ** | ||
| | 21.5 h | 19 h | ||
| St. 24 | ns | | ||
| St. 34 | ** | ** | ||
| | St. 32 | St. 24 | ||
| E4 | ** | | | |
| E6 | ** | ** | | |
| E9 | ns | * | ns | |
| E11 | * | ** | ** | * |
| E3 | E4 | E6 | E9 | |
Using Bray-Curtis similarity matrices calculated from the Discrete Fourier Transform of frame-to-frame motion parameters for (a) Danio rerio (b) Xenopus laevis and (c) Radix balthica. *** - p ≤ 0.001, ** - p ≤ 0.01, * - p ≤0.05, ns - not significant.